Advertisement

Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 283–296 | Cite as

The Expulsion of the Concept of Protection from the Consumer Law and the Return of Social Elements in the Civil Law: A Bittersweet Polemic

  • Hans-W. MicklitzEmail author
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Consumer law started in the 1960s and 1970s as consumer protection law, meant to compensate for the risks and deficiencies of the consumption society which led to an enormous increase. The target of the first generation of national consumer law was the weak consumers, those who could not cope with the increased choice and the resulting risks. The argument here presented is that the European Union by taking over consumer legislation gradually but steadily changed the outlook, from consumer protection law into consumer law. The weak consumer is not the one who is needed for the completion of the Internal Market. This is the famous average consumer which governs today’s’ normative design of the consumer law making and enforcement. However, the shift in paradigm does not set aside the need to strive for legal rules that cover the weakest in the society.

Keywords

Consumer law Private law European private law The average consumer The weak consumer 

References

  1. Barendrecht, M., Jansen, Ch., Loos, M., Pinna, A., Cascao, R., & van Gulijk, S. (2007). Service Contracts (PEL SC).Google Scholar
  2. European Commission. (2001). Communication from the Commission on European Contract Law. COM(2001) 398 final.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2008). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Consumer Rights. COM(2008) 614 final.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2010). Green Paper from the Commission on Policy Options for Progress Towards a European Contract Law for Consumers and Businesses. COM(2010)348 final.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission on a Common European Sales Law to Facilitate Cross-Border Transactions in a Single Market. COM(2011) 636 final.Google Scholar
  6. Kennedy, D. (2006). Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000. In D. Kennedy (Ed.), The new law and economic development: a critical reappraisal. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  7. Säcker, F. J. (2006). Vertragsfreiheit und Schutz vor Diskriminierung. Berlin: Beck.Google Scholar
  8. Schebesta, H. (2010). Does the National Court know European Law? A note on Ex Officio application after Asturcom. European Review of Private Law, 4–2010, 847–880.Google Scholar
  9. Steindorff, E. (1990). Grenzen der EG-Kompetenzen. Heidelberg: Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
  10. von Gierke, O. (1889). Die soziale Aufgabe des Privatrechts. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BambergGermany

Personalised recommendations