Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 145–163 | Cite as

One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem

Original Paper

Abstract

Preceding research has made hardly any attempt to measure the ecological impacts of pro-environmental behaviour in an objective way. Those impacts were rather supposed or calculated. The research described herein scrutinized the ecological impact reductions achieved through pro-environmental behaviour and raised the question how much of a reduction in carbon footprint can be achieved through voluntary action without actually affecting the socio-economic determinants of life. A survey was carried out in order to measure the difference between the ecological footprint of “green” and “brown” consumers. No significant difference was found between the ecological footprints of the two groups—suggesting that individual pro-environmental attitudes and behaviour do not always reduce the environmental impacts of consumption. This finding resulted in the formulation of a new proposition called the BIG (behaviour–impact gap) problem, which is an interesting addition to research in the field of environmental awareness gaps.

Keywords

Awareness gaps Ecological footprint Sustainable consumption Recycling Environmental awareness 

References

  1. Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17, 51–56. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(88)90022-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, S., Shaw, G., Coles, T., & Prillwitz, J. (2010). “A holiday is a holiday”: Practicing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 474–481. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bicknell, K. B., Ball, R. J., Cullen, R., & Bigsby, H. R. (1998). New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics, 27, 149–160. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00136-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, M. J., & Murphy, J. (2001). Exploring sustainable consumption: Environmental policy and the social sciences. Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  5. Csutora, M. (2011). From eco-efficiency to eco-effectiveness? The policy-performance paradox. Society and Economy, 33, 161–181. doi:10.1556/SocEc.33.2011.1.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csutora, M., & Zsóka, Á. (2011). Maximizing the efficiency of greenhouse gas related consumer policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 67–90. doi:10.1007/s10603-010-9147-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2009). The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multiregional input–output model. Ecological Economics, 68, 2066–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EUROSTAT (2008) Eurostat manual of supply, use and input–output tables, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2008 edition, 589 p.Google Scholar
  9. Fuchs, D. A., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 261–288. doi:10.1007/s10603-005-8490-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335–362. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude–behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718. doi:10.1177/0013916595275005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofmeister-Tóth, Á. & Törőcsik, M. (1996): Fogyasztói magatartás, Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.Google Scholar
  13. Hobson, K. (2001). Sustainable lifestyles: Rethinking barriers and behaviour change. In M. J. Cohen & J. Murphy (Eds.), Exploring sustainable consumption: Environmental policy and the social sciences (pp. 191–208). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Energy & Environment, 15, 1027–1051. doi:10.1260/0958305043026573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerekes, S., & Kiss, K. (2000). Basic environmental requirements for EU accession: An impact study on Hungary. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerkhof, A. C., Nonhebel, S., & Moll, H. C. (2009). Relating the environmental impact of consumption to household expenditures: An input–output analysis. Ecological Economics, 68, 1160–1170. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lenzen, M., Dey, C., & Foran, B. (2004). Energy requirements of Sydney households. Ecological Economics, 49, 375–399. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lenzen, M., & Murray, S. A. (2001). A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics, 37, 229–255. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00275-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lenzen, M., Wiedmann, T., Foran, B., Dey, C., Widmer-Cooper, A., Williams, M., & Ohlemüller, R. (2007). Forecasting the ecological footprint of nations: A blueprint for a dynamic approach, Sydney, Sydney University.Google Scholar
  21. Marjainé Szerényi, Z., Zsóka, Á., & Széchy, A. (2011). Consumer behaviour and lifestyle patterns of Hungarian students with regard to environmental awareness. Society and Economy, 33, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moll, H. C., Noorman, K. J., Kok, R., Engström, R., Throne-Holst, H., & Clark, C. (2005). Pursuing more sustainable consumption by analyzing household metabolism in European countries and cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 259–275. doi:10.1162/1088198054084662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (2006). The A-B-C of recycling. European Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 297–302.Google Scholar
  24. Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (1995). Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 345–385. doi:10.1007/BF01024160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pachauri, S. (2004). An analysis of cross-sectional variations in total household energy requirements in india using micro survey data. Energy Policy, 32, 1723–1735. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00162-9.
  26. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. Retrieved 3/21/2011, 2011, from http://www.getcited.org/pub/101276424.
  27. Sanne, C. (2002). Willing consumers—Or locked-in? Policies for a sustainable consumption. Ecological Economics, 42, 273–287. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00086-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sears, D.O., Freedman, J.L. & Peplau, L.A. (1985). Social psychology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  29. Schiffman, G. L., Hansen, H., & Kanuk, L.L. (2008). Consumer behaviour: A European outlook. Upper Sadle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Berg: Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thøgersen, J. (2005). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 143–177. doi:10.1007/s10603-005-2982-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thøgersen, J., & Grønhøj, A. (2010). Electricity saving in households—A social cognitive approach. Energy Policy, 38, 7732–7743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tukker, A., & Jansen, B. (2006). Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10, 159–182. doi:10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verhallen, T. & Pieters, R.G.M. (1984). Attitude theory and behavioral costs. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5(3). doi:10.1016/0167-4870(84)90024-2.
  36. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Zsóka, Á. (2005). Consistency and awareness gaps in pro-environmental organisational behaviour. (Doctoral dissertation. Corvinus University of Budapest).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Corvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations