Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 215–236 | Cite as

Carrotmob as a New Form of Ethical Consumption. The Nature of the Concept and Avenues for Future Research

  • Stefan Hoffmann
  • Katharina Hutter
Original Paper


A new form of ethical consumption has recently evolved: The carrotmob. As in a flashmob, consumers collectively swarm a specific store and purchase its goods in order to reward corporate socially responsible behaviour. The present paper introduces a conceptionalization of carrotmobs that takes into account the perspective of the three relevant parties: activists, companies, and consumers. First, the paper considers activists’ objectives in initiating such a social movement. It describes how they use guerrilla tactics to foster the participation of companies and consumers. Second, the paper considers the perspective of the target company, stressing the role of corporate social responsibility and describing how companies compete in an auction to become the carrotmob target. Third, the paper highlights the consumer perspective, discussing different views on consumer power and the motivation to participate in a carrotmob. The paper also points out directions for further empirical research for each of these three perspectives.


Carrotmob Buycott Ethical Consumption Flashmob 


  1. Ansoff, H. I. (1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braunsberger, K., & Buckler, B. (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research, 64, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caplan, J. (2009). Shoppers, Unite! Carrotmobs Are Cooler than Boycotts. Time Magazine, May, 15th 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Carducci, V. (2006). Culture jamming. A sociological perspective. Journal of Consumer Culture, 6, 116–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1985). Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52, 663–716.Google Scholar
  8. Cooperative Bank. (2007). Ten years of ethical consumerism: 1999–2008. UK: Manchester.Google Scholar
  9. Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (1997). The influence of firm behavior and purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson, W. N., III, Worrell, D. L., & El-Jelly, A. (1995). Influencing managers to change unpopular corporate behavior through boycotts and divestitures. Business & Society, 34, 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denegri-Knott, J., Zwick, D., & Schroeder, J. E. (2006). Mapping consumer power: An integrative framework for marketing and consumer research. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 950–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng, J., Walker, G. J., & Swinnerton, G. (2006). A comparison of environmental values and attitudes between Chinese in Canada and Anglo-Canadians. Environment and Behavior, 38, 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derbaix, C., & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing word-of mouth by eliciting surprise—A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckberg, D. L., & Blocker, T. J. (1989). Varieties of religious involvement and environmental concerns: Testing the Lynn White Thesis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ettenson, R., & Klein, J. G. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific: A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farah, M. F., & Newman, A. J. (2009). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feddersen, T. J., & Gilligan, T. W. (2001). Saints and markets: Activists and the supply of credence goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrell, O. C., & Maignan, I. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1985). Freiheit und Selbstsorge. Frankfurt: Materalis.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  23. Friedman, M. (1995). American consumer boycotts in response to rising food prices: Housewives’ protests at the grassroots level. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, M. (1996). A positive approach to organized consumer action: The “buycott” as an alternative to the boycott. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedman, M. (1999). Consumer boycotts: Effecting change through the marketplace and the media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (1995). The unmanageable consumer: Contemporary consumption and its fragmentation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Gamson, W. A. (1988). Political discourse and collective action. International Social Movement Research, 1, 219–244.Google Scholar
  28. Greeley, A. (1993). Religion and attitudes toward the environment. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Handelman, J. M. (1999). Culture jamming: Expanding the application of the critical research project. In E. Arnould & L. M. Scott (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (app, Vol. 26, pp. 399–404). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  30. Hansen, U., & Schrader, U. (1997). A modern model of consumption for sustainable society. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., Robinson, S., Vadovics, E., & Saastamoinen, M. (2010). Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy Policy, 38, 7586–7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoffmann, S., & Müller, S. (2009). Consumer boycotts due to factory relocation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoffmann, S., Mai, R., & Smirnova, M. (2011). Development and validation of a cross-nationally stable scale of consumer animosity. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 19, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organisations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Hollenbeck, C. R., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2010). Anti-brand communities, negotiation of brand meaning, and the learning process: The case of Wal-Mart. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 13, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holt, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1993). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  41. Hutter, K., & Hoffmann, S. (2011). Guerrilla marketing. The nature of the concept and propositions for further research. Asian Journal of Marketing, 5, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Jensen, H. R. (2008). The Mohammed cartoons controversy and the boycott of Danish products in the Middle East. European Business Review, 20, 275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68, 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kozinets, R., & Handelman, J. M. (1998). Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior. In J. W. Alba & J. W. Hutchinson (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 25, pp. 475–480). Provo: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  46. Kozinets, R., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 691–705.Google Scholar
  47. Krishna, V. (2002). Auction theory. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  48. Levinson, J. C. (2007). Guerrilla-marketing—Easy and inexpensive strategies for making big profit from small business (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  49. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lyon, S. (2007). Fair trade coffee and human rights in Guatemala. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 699–738.Google Scholar
  52. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1973). The trend of social movements in America. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  53. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Menezes, F. M., & Monteiro, P. K. (2008). Introduction to auction theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Meyer, W.-U., Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schützwohl, A. (1991). An experimental analysis of surprise. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Micheletti, M., & Follesdal, A. (2007). Shopping for human rights. An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milfont, T. L., Duckitt, J., & Cameron, L. D. (2006). A cross-cultural study of environmental motive concerns and their implications for proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 38, 745–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsibility? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M. (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to Gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Murray, J. B., Ozanne, J. L., & Shapiro, J. M. (1994). Revitalizing the critical imagination: Unleashing the crouched tiger. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 559–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neilson, L. A. (2010). Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Neilson, L. A., & Paxton, P. (2010). Social capital and political consumerism: A multilevel analysis. Social Problems, 57, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Connor, M. C. (2009). The business of activism. Entrepreneur, 37, 43.Google Scholar
  65. Oliver, P. E. (1993). Formal models of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 19(271), 300.Google Scholar
  66. Oreg, S., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2006). Predicting proenvironmental behavior cross-nationally: Values, the theory of planned behavior, and value-belief-norm theory. Environment and Behavior, 38, 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pape, J., Rau, H., Fahy, F., & Davies, A. (2011). Developing policies and instruments for sustainable household consumption: Irish experiences and futures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peak, H.-J., & Nelson, M. R. (2009). To buy or not to buy: Determinants of socially responsible consumer behavior and consumer reactions to cause-related and boycotting ads. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peñaloza, L., & Price, L. L. (1993). Consumer resistance: A conceptional overview. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 123–128.Google Scholar
  70. Pezzullo, P. C. (2011). Contextualizing boycotts and buycotts: The impure politics of consumer-based advocacy in an age of global ecological crises. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8, 124–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pruitt, S. W., & Friedman, M. (1986). Determining the effectiveness of consumer boycotts: A stock price analysis of their impact on corporate targets. Journal of Consumer Policy, 9, 375–387.Google Scholar
  72. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  73. Rumbo, J. D. (2002). Consumer resistance in a world of advertising clutter: The case of adbuster. Psychology and Marketing, 19, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sebastiani, R., Dalli, D., & Montagnini, F. (2011). How consumers shape the market: ethics and value co-creation, working paper.Google Scholar
  75. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shankar, A., Cherrier, H., & Canniford, R. (2006). Consumer empowerment: A Foucauldian interpretation. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1013–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006). Consumption as voting: An exploration of consumer empowerment. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1049–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith, N. C. (1987). Consumer boycotts and consumer sovereignty. European Journal of Marketing, 21, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith, N. C. (1990). Morality and the market: Consumer pressure for corporate accountability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Soyez, K., Hoffmann, S., Wünschmann, S., & Gelbrich, K. (2009). Proenvironmental values across cultures. Development of a German and Russian Scale. Social Psychology, 40, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Steinrücken, T., & Jaenichen, S. (2007). The fair trade idea: Towards an economics of social labels. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tarrow, S. G. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action, and mass politics in the modern state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Taylor, T. (2008). Meet the CarrotMob: Forget negative campaigning, why not reward Green businesses instead - with a group spending spree? The Guardian, September, 18th 2008.Google Scholar
  87. The Economist (2009). For-profit activism: Change we can profit from. The Economist, January, 31st 2009.Google Scholar
  88. Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Social dilemmas: The state of the art. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), A social psychological approach to social dilemmas (pp. 2–28). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  90. Vanclay, J., Shortiss, J., Aulsebrook, S., Gillespie, A., Howell, B., Johanni, R., Maher, M., Mitchell, K., Stewart, M., & Yates, J. (2011). Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  92. Welzel, C., Inglehart, R. F., & Deutsch, F. (2005). Social capital, voluntary associations and collective action: Which aspects of social capital have the greatest ‘civic’ payoff? Journal of Civil Society, 1, 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wilkinson, J. (2007). Fair trade: Dynamic and dilemmas of a market oriented global social movement. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zald, M. N., & Berger, M. A. (1978). Social movements in organizations: Coup d’etat, insurgency, and mass movements. American Journal of Society, 83, 823–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business Management and Economics, Department of MarketingDresden University of TechnologyDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations