Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 23–41 | Cite as

Smart Homes as a Means to Sustainable Energy Consumption: A Study of Consumer Perceptions

  • Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz
  • Elisabeth Dütschke
  • Wolf Fichtner
Original Paper


European and national policies are aimed at reducing greenhouse gases and increasing energy efficiency—also in the household sector. For this purpose, new solutions for private homes based on information and communication technologies (ICT) are being developed and tested. However, up to now, hardly anyone has seen, experienced or lived in an environment that offers the full range of ICT-based energy management solutions. In this study, consumer reactions to a fully furnished and equipped smart home are analysed using focus groups (four groups with a total of 29 participants). The analysis looks at consumer perceptions of and reactions to an energy management system which optimizes electricity consumption based on different ICT solutions. The topics that were demonstrated in practice and then discussed with the participants included variable tariffs, smart metering, smart appliances, and home automation. In general, there were positive group reactions to the smart home environment. Consumers saw many advantages for themselves; especially the chance to save money. However, giving up high levels of flexibility and adapting everyday routines to fit in with electricity tariffs were regarded as difficult. Smart appliances and smart meters were therefore considered to be necessary elements by most participants. Concerns regarding data privacy played a major role in one of the groups.


Sustainable consumption Smart home Smart energy management Consumer perception Focus groups 



This research was made possible as a part of the project MeRegioMobil, which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (Grant 01ME09005).


  1. Allen, D., & Janda, K. (2006). The effect of household characteristics and energy use consciousness on the effectiveness of real-time energy use feedback: A pilot study. Proceedings of the ACEEE 2006 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Bergstein, H., & Estelani, H. (2002). A survey of emerging technologies for pricing new-to-the world products. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11, 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birzle-Harder, B.,Deffner, J., & Götz, K. (2008). Lust am Sparen oder totale Kontrolle? Akzeptanz von Stromverbrauchs-Feedback. Report. Can be ordered from URL:
  4. BMWi. (2011). Eckpunkte für ein energiepolitisches Konzept. Report of the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. URL:,did=405004.html (06/06/2011).
  5. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darby, S. (2010). Smart metering: What potential for householder engagement? Building Research and Information, 38, 442–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IBM Global Business Services, & Zentrum für Evaluation und Methoden der Universität Bonn. (2007). Preis, Verbrauch und Umwelt versus Komfort—der mündige Energieverbraucher. Verbrauchsverhalten und neue Möglichkeiten zur Kundenbindung und Kundengewinnung für Energieversorger. Report. URL: (28/01/11).
  8. Energate. (2011). Daily News, Energate Messenger N 119, 22.06.2011.Google Scholar
  9. SF—Sustainability First and Engage Consulting Limited. (2008). International Smart Meter Trial Selected Case Studies Smart Tariffs and Customer Stimuli. Report. URL: (28/01/11).
  10. Faruqui, A., Harris, D., & Hledik, R. (2010). Unlocking the €52 billion savings from smart meters in the EU. Energy Policy, 38, 6222–6231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, C. (2007). Influencing electricity consumption via consumer feedback: a review of experience. Proceedings ECEEE 2007 Summer Study, 1873–1884.Google Scholar
  12. forsa. (2010). Erfolgsfaktoren von Smart Metering aus Verbrauchersicht. Report.URL:
  13. Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Feedback on household electricity consumption: Learning and social influence processes. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2010). Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, 38, 6111–6119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heberlein, K., & Warriner, G. K. (1983). The influence of price and attitude on shifting residential electricity consumption from on-to off-peak periods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 107–130.Google Scholar
  16. Kuckartz, U., Dresing, T., Rädiker, S., & Stefer, C. (2007). Qualitative evaluation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  17. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2).Google Scholar
  18. Mert, W., Watts, M., & Tritthart, W. (2009). Smart domestic appliances in sustainable energy systems—Consumer acceptance and restrictions. Proceedings of the ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, 1751–1761.Google Scholar
  19. Pyrko, J. (2011). Am I as smart as my smart meter is?—Swedish experience of statistics feedback to households. Proceedings of the ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 1837–1841.Google Scholar
  20. Raabe, O., Lorenz, M., Pallas, F., Weis, E., & Malina, A. (2011). 14 Thesen zum Datenschutz im Smart Grid. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, 08(2011), 519–523.Google Scholar
  21. Schleich, J., Klobasa, M., Goelz, S., & Götz, K. (2011).Smart metering in Germany—Results of providing feedback information in a field trial. Proceedings of the ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, 1667–1674.Google Scholar
  22. UBA. (2011).CO 2 -Emissionen nach Quellkategorien. Bericht des Umweltbundesamtes. Report. URL: (29/01/11).
  23. Van Dam, S. S., Bakker, C. A., & Van Hal, J. D. M. (2010). Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium term. Building Research & Information, 38, 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Westendorp, P. (1976). NSS-price sensitivity meter (PSM). A new approach to study consumer perception of price. Proceedings of the 29th ESOMAR Congress, 139–167.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Dütschke
    • 2
  • Wolf Fichtner
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Energy EconomicsKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations