Advertisement

Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 377–401 | Cite as

Early Experiences of the Enforcement of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive in Scotland

  • Jane WilliamsEmail author
  • Caroline Hare
Original Paper

Abstract

This exploratory study examines the early impact of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC on enforcers in Scotland within the context of current policy developments regarding the use of civil and criminal enforcement mechanisms within the UK. The Directive has been implemented in the UK by means of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 SI 1277 and the duty to enforce the Regulations falls primarily to local authority trading standards services. Twenty-one in-depth interviews were conducted with a range of officers employed within the trading standards service based in eight local authorities in Scotland on their perceptions of the new Regulations. The main findings were that officers’ views of the new Regulations and the civil and criminal enforcement routes available to them was affected by structural, operational, and cultural issues which varied from one authority to another. A number of officers were finding the Regulations a challenge to old ways and there was evidence that many felt unprepared for the Regulations. A number of positive views were expressed regarding the flexibility of the new Regulations and the advantages of the provisions relating to misleading omissions. Overall officers’ experiences of the Regulations were heavily influenced by the complaints received by their particular local authority service.

Keywords

Consumer protection UK Consumer law European law and fair trading Regulation Unfair Commercial practices directive 

References

  1. Abbamonte, G. (2007). The unfair commercial practices directive and its general prohibition. In S. Weatherill & U. Bernitz (Eds.), The regulation of unfair commercial practices under EC Directive 2005/29: New rules and new techniques (pp. 11–31). Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Accounts Commission. (2002). Made to measure: An overview of trading standards services in Scotland. Edinburgh: Accounts Commission.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. (2007). Better regulation: Tensions aboard the enterprise. In S. Weatherill (Ed.), Better regulation (pp. 27–47). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R., & Black, J. (2007). Really responsive regulation. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 15/2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1033322. Accessed 3 June 2010.
  6. BERR. (2008). Implementation of the unfair commercial practices directive: Government response to the consumer protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. London: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.Google Scholar
  7. BIS. (2009). Consumer law review call for evidence: Summary of responses. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  8. BIS. (2010). Civil sanctions pilot: A consultation on the pilot operation of civil sanction powers for consumer law enforcers. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  9. Black, J. (2008). Forms and paradoxes of principles based regulation. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 13/2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1267722. Accessed 3 June 2010
  10. Cartwright, P. (2007). Crime, punishment and consumer protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cathcart, C., & Williams, J. (2009). The highly detailed general principles of the consumer protection from unfair trading regulations. Scottish Law Gazette, 77, 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. CEC. (2009). Guidance on the implementation/application of Directive 2005/29/EC on unfair commercial practices. Brussels: Commission of the European Commission. European Commission Staff Working Document. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/rights/docs/Guidance_UCP_Directive_en.pdf Accessed 3 December 2009.
  13. Collins, H. (2010). Harmonisation by example: European laws against unfair commercial practices. Modern Law Review, 73, 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Consumer Focus Scotland. (2010). Up to standard? A review of trading standards services in Scotland. Glasgow: Consumer Focus Scotland.Google Scholar
  15. Cranston, R. (1979). Regulating business: Law and consumer agencies. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  16. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). California: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. DTI. (2005). The unfair commercial practices directive: Consultation on implementing EU directive on unfair commercial practices and amending existing consumer legislation. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  18. DTI. (2006a). Government response to the consultation paper on implementing the unfair commercial practices directive. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  19. DTI. (2006b). The unfair commercial practices directive: Consultation on framing and enforcing criminal sanctions in the Regulations implementing the unfair commercial practices directive. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  20. DTI (2007). Implementation of the unfair commercial practices directive: Government response to the consultation on how to frame criminal offences. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Available online from: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file39705.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2009.
  21. Ervine, W. C. H. (2008). Consumer law in Scotland (4th ed.). Edinburgh: W. Green.Google Scholar
  22. Faure, M. G., Ogus, A., & Philipsen, N. J. (2008). Enforcement practices for breaches of consumer protection legislation. Loyola consumer law review, 20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290548. Accessed 16 June 2009.
  23. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  24. Hampton, P. (2005). Reducing administrative burdens: Effective inspection and enforcement. London: H M Treasury.Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, B. W., & Parry, D. L. (2000). The law of consumer protection and fair trading (6th ed.). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  26. Hawkins, K. (1984). Environment and enforcement. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  27. HMSO. (2009). A better deal for consumers: Delivering real help now and change for the future. Cm7669. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  28. Howells, G. (2007). Unfair commercial practices directive—a missed opportunity? In S. Weatherill & U. Bernitz (Eds.), The regulation of unfair commercial practices under EC Directive 2005/29: New rules and new techniques (pp. 103–114). Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Howells, G., Miklitz, H. W., & Wilhelmsson, T. (2009). Towards a better understanding of unfair commercial practices. International Journal of Law and Management, 51, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hutter, B. M. (1997). Compliance regulation and environment. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  31. Incardona, C., & Poncibo, I. (2007). The average consumer, the unfair commercial practices directive and the cognitive revolution. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ipsos/MORI (2008). Business perception of local authority regulatory services. Birmingham: LBRO, Available online at: http://www.lbro.org.uk/docs/survey-of-business-perceptions.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2010.
  33. LBRO. (2009). Mapping the local authority regulatory services landscape. Birmingham: Local Better Regulation Office.Google Scholar
  34. Macrory, R. (2006). Regulatory justice: Making sanctions effective final report. London: Cabinet Office [online]. Available online at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file44593.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2009.
  35. Macrory, R. (2008). Regulation, enforcement and governance in environmental law. London: Canon May Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. May, P. J., & Wood, R. S. (2003). At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nielsen, V., & Parker, C. (2009). Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement. Regulation and Governance, 4, 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. OFT. (2003). Annual report and resource accounts 2002 – 2003. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  39. OFT. (2004). Annual report and resource accounts 2003 – 2004. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available at: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  40. OFT. (2005). Annual report and resource accounts 2004 – 2005. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  41. OFT. (2006). Annual report and resource accounts 2005 – 2006. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  42. OFT. (2007). Annual report and resource accounts 2006 – 2007. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  43. OFT. (2008a). Statement of consumer protection enforcement principles. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_protection/oft964.pdf. Accessed on line 8 July 2009.
  44. OFT. (2008b). Annual report and resource accounts 2007 – 2008. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  45. OFT. (2009a). Home maintenance tops list of consumer protection cases one year on. London: Office of Fair Trading. Press release. Available online at: http://www.oft.gov.uk/news/press/2009/59-09. Accessed 30 May 2009.
  46. OFT. (2009b). Annual report and resource accounts 2008 – 2009. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available online from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/publications/publication-categories/corporate/annual-report/. Accessed online 8 June 2010.
  47. OFT. (2010). Guidance for second hand car dealers. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available online at: http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/676408/oft1241.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2010.
  48. OFT/BERR. (2008). Consumer protection from unfair trading. London: Office of Fair Trading & Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.Google Scholar
  49. Ogus, A. (2007). Better regulation—better enforcement. In S. Weatherill (Ed.), Better regulation (pp. 107–122). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Parker, C. (2006). The “compliance” trap: The moral message in responsive regulatory enforcement. Law and Society Review, 40, 591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peysner, J., & Nurse, A. (2008). Representative actions and restorative justice: A report for the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform London: BERR Available on line at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file51559.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2009.
  52. Rogers, P. (2007). National enforcement priorities for local authority regulatory services. London: Cabinet Office. Available online from: http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/rogersreview/upload/assets/rogersreview/rogers_review_2007.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2009.
  53. Rowan-Robinson, J., Watchman, P., & Barker, C. (1990). Crime and regulation: A study of the enforcement of regulatory codes. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  54. Rowell, R. (2008). The oily rag of enforcement. In C. Twigg-Flesner, G. Howells, D. Parry, & A. Nordhausen (Eds.), The yearbook of consumer law (pp. 357–364). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. SDD. (1984). The enforcement of planning control in Scotland cited in Rowan-Robinson J., Watchman P., & Barker C. (1990) Crime and regulation: A study of the enforcement of regulatory codes. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
  56. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In W. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Trading Standards/OFT. (2010). Workforce survey 2009. London: TSI.Google Scholar
  58. Twigg-Flesner, C., & Parry, D. (2007). The challenges posed by the implementation of the directive into domestic law—A UK perspective. In S. Weatherill & U. Bernitz (Eds.), The regulation of unfair commercial practices under EC directive 2005/29: New rules and new techniques (pp. 215–233). Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  59. Twigg-Flesner, C., Parry, D., Howells, G., & Nordhausen, A. (2005). An analysis of the application and scope of the unfair commercial practices directive: A report for the DTI London: DTI. Available online at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file32095.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2009.
  60. Vickers, I. (2008). Better regulation and enterprise: The case of environmental health risk regulation in Britain. Policy studies, 29, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weatherill, S. (2007b). The challenge of better regulation. In S. Weatherill (Ed.), Better regulation (pp. 1–17). Oxford UK: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Yapp, C., & Fairman, R. (2006). Factors affecting food safety compliance within small and medium sized enterprises: Implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Control, 17, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business, Enterprise and ManagementQueen Margaret UniversityMusselburghUK

Personalised recommendations