Customer Response to Carbon Labelling of Groceries
- 2.4k Downloads
Thirty-seven products were labelled to indicate embodied carbon emissions, and sales were recorded over a 3-month period. Green (below average), yellow (near average), and black (above average) footprints indicated carbon emissions embodied in groceries. The overall change in purchasing pattern was small, with black-labelled sales decreasing 6% and green-labelled sales increasing 4% after labelling. However, when green-labelled products were also the cheapest, the shift was more substantial, with a 20% switch from black- to green-label sales. These findings illustrate the potential for labelling to stimulate reductions in carbon emissions.
KeywordsCarbon label Ecological footprint Emissions reduction Green consumers Consumer environmental purchasing behaviour
This project received ethics approval number ECN-08-089 from Southern Cross University and was conducted as part of the undergraduate subject FOR00110 Natural Resource Policy within the School of Environmental Science and Management at Southern Cross University. Thanks to the manufacturers and suppliers of goods included in this study for assisting with calculations and supplying information about carbon footprints.
- ACF. (2007). Consuming Australia. Sydney: Australian Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
- Anonymous (2008). Carbon labelling and Tesco. www.tesco.com/assets/greenerliving/content/pdf/Carbon_Labelling_and_Tesco.pdf. Consulted 7 August 2008.
- Berry, T., Crossley, D., & Jewell, J. (2008). Check-out carbon: The role of carbon labelling in delivering a low-carbon shopping basket. London: Forum for the Future.Google Scholar
- Biel, A., Dahlstrand, U., & Grankvist, G. (2005). Habitual and value-guided purchase behavior. Ambio, 34, 360–365.Google Scholar
- Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (2000). Repeat buying: Facts, theory and applications. Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 5, 392–770.Google Scholar
- Garnaut, R. (2008). The garnaut climate change review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Thøgersen, J. (2002). Promoting “green” consumer behavior with eco-labels. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures (pp. 83–104). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Thøgersen, J., Haugaard, P., & Olesen, A. (2010). Understanding consumer responses to ecolabels. European Journal of Marketing, 44, 11/12 (in press).Google Scholar
- Vandenbergh, M. P., & Steinemann, A. C. (2007). The carbon-neutral individual. New York University Law Review, 82, 1673–1745.Google Scholar
- Wallace, J. (2007). Easy on the oil: Policy options for a smaller waistline and a lighter footprint. Adelaide: South Australian Department of Premier and Cabinet. www.brass.cf.ac.uk/uploads/Wallace_A70.pdf. Consulted 5 May 2009.
- Weightman, D., & McDonagh, D. (2004). Supra-functional factors in sustainable products. In T. Bhamra & B. Hon (Eds.), Design and manufacture for sustainable development 2004 (pp. 91–101). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31.Google Scholar