Europeanisation of Product Liability in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Preliminary Empirical Benchmark
This report draws primarily on a survey offering a tentative but empirical benchmark of the impact of strict-liability product liability law reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region. There has been a two-fold Europeanisation of product liability in this region. First, the reforms implemented in many jurisdictions during the last 15 years have usually been based on the 1985 EC Product Liability Directive. Secondly, moving beyond the “law in books,” the survey confirms other indications of considerable convergence in the “law in action.” This largely mirrors trends from Lovells’ baseline survey of European jurisdictions completed in 2002 for the European Commission. Similar effects associated with similar reforms include small but significant increases in claims, settlements, and reactions from companies. However, these tendencies are also affected by broader (arguably inter-related) factors such as shifts in consumer consciousness and media attention. Rather than the reforms directly, increased awareness of consumer rights and the media have been identified as being more influential to the increase in claims. These factors are also very important in generating more settlements. Conventional causes of action also continue to be invoked, and there is not much call for further reform. Thus, high levels of product liability litigation remain unique to the United States. However, growing case law in certain Asia-Pacific and European jurisdictions might be synthesised into “Strict Liability Product Liability Principles.” It also seems likely that the Asia-Pacific region will continue to follow more the EU in related areas such as consumer access to justice and product safety regulation, and such harmonization may accompany the proliferating Free Trade Agreements in the region.
KeywordsProduct liability Tort law reform Asia-Pacific
- Amin, N. (2007). Product liability in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Sweet and Maxwell Asia.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Hobhouse Memorial Lecture, London School of Economics, 15 February 2006. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/sociology/pdf/Beck-LivingintheWorldRiskSociety-Feb2006.pdf.
- Cass, D. Z., Williams, B. G., & Barker, G. (Eds.) (2003). China and the world trading system: Entering the new millennium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cavaliere, A. (2004). Product liability in the European Union: Compensation and deterrence issues. European Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 299–318.Google Scholar
- Ceniza, E. (1999). Philippines. In J. Kellam (Ed.), Product liability in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 221–242). Sydney: Prospect Media.Google Scholar
- EC Study (2003). Lovells - Product liability in the European Union. Report for the European Commission, MARKT/2001/11/D. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/regulation/goods/docs/liability/studies/lovells-study_en.pdf.
- Farrar, J. (1989). Harmonisation of business law between Australia and New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 19(4), 435–463.Google Scholar
- Goldring, J. (1992). Victory of lobbying over reason. Australian Product Liability Reporter, 3(3), 21–25.Google Scholar
- Gresson, J. (1999). New Zealand. In J. Kellam (Ed.), Product liability in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 221–242). Sydney: Prospect Media.Google Scholar
- Haltom, W., & McCann, M. J. (2004). Distorting the law: Politics, media, and the litigation crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Hamada, K. (1996). Consumers, the legal system and product liability reform: A comparative perspective between Japan and the United States. Columbia University Center on Japanese Economy and Business Working Paper, 116. http://digitalcommons.libraries.columbia.edu/japanwps/116.
- Howells, G. (2006). The rise of European Consumer Law—Wither National Consumer Law? Sydney Law Review, 28, 63–88.Google Scholar
- Kellam, J. (2000a). Product liability in the Asia-Pacific. Australian Product Liability Reporter, 10(10), 133–138.Google Scholar
- Kellam, J. (2000b). The Contract-Tort Dichotomy and a theoretical framework for product liability law: A comparison of the elements of liability in product liability law in Australia, France and Germany. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
- Kellam, J., & Nottage, L. (2006). Report on Clayton Utz Asia-Pacific product liability survey. Australian Product Liability Reporter, 17(9), 121–140.Google Scholar
- Kellam, J., & Nottage, L. (2007). Happy 15th Birthday, TPA Part VA! Australia’s product liability morass. Competition and Consumer Law Journal, 15, 26–73.Google Scholar
- Kitagawa, T., & Nottage, L. (2007). Globalization of Japanese corporations and the development of corporate legal departments: Problems and prospects. In W. Alford (Ed.), Raising the bar (pp. 201–285). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, T., & Cheung, K. (2008). Hong Kong. In D. T. I. (Ed.), Product Liability Defenses. Defense Research Institute (Chicago 2008).Google Scholar
- Leflar, R. B., & Iwata, F. (2005). Medical error as reportable event, as tort, as crime: A transpacific comparison. Widener Law Review, 12, 195–225.Google Scholar
- Lenze, S. (2005). German product liability law: Between European directives, American restatements and common sense. In D. Fairgrieve (Ed.), Product liability in comparative perspective (pp. 100–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Li, J. (2006). Law on product quality control and product liability in China. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein.Google Scholar
- Lui, L. (1999). Taiwan. In J. Kellam (Ed.), Product liability in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 283–310). Sydney: Prospect Media.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2004). Product safety and liability law in Japan: From Minamata to mad cows. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2005). Redirecting Japan’s multi-level governance. In K. Hopt, E. Wymeersch, H. Kanda & H. Baum (Eds.), Corporate governance in context: Corporations, state, and markets in Europe, Japan, and the US (pp. 571–598). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2006). The ABCs of product safety re-regulation in Japan: Asbestos, buildings, consumer electrical goods, and Schindler’s lifts. Griffith Law Review, 15(2), 242–286.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2007a). Comparing product liability and safety in Japan: Path-dependent globalization. In H. Scheiber (Ed.), Emerging concepts of rights in Japanese law (pp. 143–167). Berkeley: UC Berkeley - Robbins Collection.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2007b). Product liability and safety regulation. In G. McAlinn (Ed.), Japanese Business Law (pp. 221–62). The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2007c). Product safety regulation reform in Australia and Japan: Harmonising towards European models? Yearbook of Consumer Law, 2007, 429–446.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L. (2008). Product safety. In G. Howells, et al. (Ed.), Handbook of international consumer law and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Nottage, L., & Wada, Y. (1998). Japan’s new product liability ADR centers: Bureaucratic, industry, or consumer informalism? Zeitschrift fuer Japanisches Recht, 6, 40–81.Google Scholar
- Ramirez, M. (2008). Thailand. In D. T. I. (Ed.), Product Liability Defenses. Defense Research Institute (Chicago 2008).Google Scholar
- Reimann, M. (2003b). Product liability in a global context: The hollow victory of the European model. European Review of Private Law, 11(2), 128–154.Google Scholar
- Stapleton, J. (1994). Product liability. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
- Stapleton, J. (2007). Liability for drugs in the US and EU: Rhetoric and reality. The Review of Litigation, 26(4), 991–1033.Google Scholar
- Trindade, F. A., Cane, P., & Lunney, M. (2007). The law of torts in Australia. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Vogel, D. (2001). The new politics of risk regulation in Europe. LSE CARR Discussion Paper, 3. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CARR/pdf/Disspaper3.pdf.
- WTO (World Trade Organisation) (2007). Fourth trade policy review of India Trade Policy Review Body, 23 and 25 May 2007.Google Scholar