Bootleggers, Baptists, and the risks of rent seeking
Interest groups ‘caught’ influencing public policy solely for private gain risk public backlash. These risks can be diminished, and rent seeking efforts made more successful, when moral or social arguments are employed in pushing for changes to public policy. Following Yandle’s Bootlegger and Baptist model, we postulate this risk differential should manifest itself in regulatory output with social regulations being more responsive to political influence than economic regulations. We test, and confirm, our theory using data on economic and social regulations from the new RegData project matched with data on campaign contributions and lobbying activity at the industry level.
KeywordsRent seeking Social regulation Bootleggers and Baptists
JEL ClassificationA13 H42 K20
- Anderson, M. 2017. For Earth Day, here’s how Americans view environmental issues. Pew Research Center http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/20/for-earth-day-heres-how-americans-view-environmental-issues/. Accessed April 5, 2019.
- Bar-Gill, O., & Warren, E. (2008). Making credit safer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157, 1–101.Google Scholar
- Brito, J., & Dudley, S. E. (2012). Regulation: A primer. Arlington: Mercatus Center at George Mason University.Google Scholar
- Congleton, R. D. (2018). The Political Economy of Rent Creation and Rent Extraction. In R. D. Congleton, B. N. Grofman, & S. Voigt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Congleton, R. D., Hillman, A. L., & Konrad, K. A. (2008). Forty years of research on rent seeking: fan overview. The Theory of Rent Seeking: Forty Years of Research, 1, 1–42.Google Scholar
- Dudley, S., & Warren, M. (2011). Fiscal statement reflected in regulators’ budget: An analysis of the U.S. budget for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. Wiedenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy. St. Louis: Washington University.Google Scholar
- Hennan, A. 2018. The Quizzical Case of UNC’s “Buy Local” Resolution. The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal: https://www.jamesgmartin.center/2018/03/quizzical-case-uncs-buy-local-resolution/. Accessed April 15, 2018.
- Hillman, A. L., & Long, N. V. (2018). Rent seeking: the social cost of contestable benefits. In R. D. Congleton, B. N. Grofman, & S. Voigt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hillman, A.L. & Ursprung, H.W. (1992). The influence of environmental concerns on the political determination of trade policy. The greening of world trade issues, p. 195–220.Google Scholar
- Langer, G. 2010. Citizens united poll: 80 percent of Americans oppose supreme court decision. The Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/17/citizens-united-poll-80-p_n_465396.html. Accessed April 5, 2019.
- Lilly, W., & Miller, J. C. (1977). The new social regulation. The Public Interest, 47, 28–36.Google Scholar
- Lipford, J. W., & Slice, J. (2007). Adam Smith’s roles for government and contemporary US government roles. The Independent Review, 11(4), 485–501.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. C., & Yandle, B. (Eds.). (1979). Benefit-cost analyses of social regulation: Case studies from the council on wage and price stability (Vol. 231). Washington: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? The American Economic Review, 83(2), 409–414.Google Scholar
- Office of Management & Budget. 2011. Fiscal year 2012 historical tables, budget of the United States. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/hist.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2011.
- Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Seitz-Wald, A. 2012. “Everyone hates citizens united.” Salon. http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/people_really_hate_citizens_united/. Accessed April 5, 2019.
- Smith, A. C., & Yandle, B. (2014). Bootleggers and Baptists: How economic forces and moral persuasion interact to shape regulatory politics. Washington: Cato Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. C., & Zywicki, T. (2015). Behavior, paternalism, and policy: evaluating consumer financial protection. NYUJL & Liberty, 9, 201.Google Scholar
- Soper, S. 2019. Amazon scraps plan to build a headquarters in New York City. Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-14/amazon-says-it-won-t-build-a-headquarters-in-new-york-city. Accessed March 24, 2019.
- Stratmann, T. 2005. Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature. In Policy challenges and political responses (pp. 135–156). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
- The Center for Responsive Politics. 2017. Opensecrets RSS. Combined Federal Campaign of the National Capital Area. http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/slist.php Accessed January 27, 2017.
- Tullock, G. (1972). The purchase of politicians. Western Economic Journal [Economic Inquiry], 10, 354–355.Google Scholar
- Vogel, D. (1988). The ‘new’ social regulation in historical and comparative perspective (p. 431). American Law and the Constitutional Order: Historical Perspectives.Google Scholar
- Weidenbaum, M. L. (1977). Business, government and the public. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Yandle, B. (1983). Bootleggers and Baptists—The education of a regulatory economist. Regulation, 7, 12.Google Scholar
- Yandle, B. (1999). Bootleggers and Baptists in retrospect. Regulation, 22, 5.Google Scholar