Constitutional moments in Eastern Europe and subjectivist political economy

Original Paper

Abstract

This article provides epistemic foundations for traditional rational-choice political science, to explain when and how ideas matter. Operational codes, epistemic communities and the structural patterns of ideas demonstrates the constitutional moments that occur during crises, and how ideas can underpin and direct the formation of interest groups. The implications for policy reform are discussed, along with an application to the Constitutional Moments during the transition of Central and Eastern Europe.

Keywords

Constitutional moments Epistemic communities Institutions Public choice Rational-choice Transition economies 

JEL Classifications

A12 B53 D78 D8 P3 P16 P48 

References

  1. Ackerman, B. (1991). We the people: Foundations. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, B. (1998). We The People: Transformations. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, B. (1999). Revolution on a human scale. The Yale Law Journal, 108(8), 2279–2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adler, E., & Haas, P. M. (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of an effective research program. International Organization, 46(1), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aligica, P. D. (2003). Operational codes, institutional learning and the optimistic model of post-Communist social change. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 36, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aligica, P. D., & Evans, A. J. (2009). The neoliberal revolution in Eastern Europe: Economic ideas in the transition from communism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Aligica, P. D., & Evans, A. J. (2008). Thought experiments, counterfactuals and comparative analysis: Methodological challenges in the Austrian tradition. Review of Austrian Economics (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  8. Aligica, P. D., & Terpe, H. (2005). The flat tax experiment: The Romanian case. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Ashford, N. (1997). Politically impossible? How ideas, not interests and circumstances, determine public policy. Policy (Sydney, Centre for Independent Studies), 13(1), 21–25.Google Scholar
  10. Aslund, A. (2007). How capitalism was built: The transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Balcerowicz, L. (1994). Understanding postcommunist transitions. Journal of Democracy, 5(2), 75–89.Google Scholar
  12. Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L., & Weingast, B. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Benedict, M. L. (1999). Constitutional history and constitutional theory: Reflections on Ackerman, reconstruction, and the transformation of the American constitution. The Yale Law Journal, 108(8), 2011–2038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, 56(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Boettke, P. J. (1995). Hayek’s the road to serfdom revisited: Government failure in the argument against socialism. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  18. Boettke, P. J. (2003). Milton and Rose Friedman’s free to choose and it’s Impact on the global movement toward free market policy: 1979–2003. Free to Choose Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (pp. 137–152).Google Scholar
  19. Braun, D. (1999). Interests of ideas? An overview of ideational concepts in public policy research. In D. Braun & A. Busch (Eds.), Public policy and political ideas. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Braun, D., & Busch, A. (Eds.). (1999). Public policy and political ideas. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. J. (2002). Constitutional implications of radical subjectivism. Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2/3), 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burnham, W. D. (1999). Constitutional moments and punctuated equilibria: A political scientist confronts Bruce Ackerman’s we the people. The Yale Law Journal, 108(8), 2237–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Busch, A. (1999). From ‘Hooks’ to ‘Focal Points’: The changing role of ideas in rational choice theory. In D. Braun & A. Busch (Eds.), Public policy and political ideas. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Busch, A., & Braun, D. (1999). Introduction. In D. Braun & A. Busch (Eds.), Public policy and political ideas. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Campbell, J. L. (2001). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. In J. L. Campbell & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Caplan, B. (2003). The idea trap: The political economy of growth divergence. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Caplan, B. (2007). The myth of the rational voter: Why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Checkel, J. T. (1991). Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. Industrial Organization, 55(3), 553–588.Google Scholar
  34. Checkel, J. T. (1993). Ideas, institutions and the Gorbachov foreign policy revolution. International Organization, 45(2), 271–300.Google Scholar
  35. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Douglas, G. W., & Miller, J. C. (1974). Domestic airline regulation: Theory and policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  37. Drezner, D. W. (2000). Ideas, bureaucratic politics, and the crafting of foreign policy. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 733–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Edsall, N. (1986). Richard Cobden, Independent Radical. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Elster, J. (2000). Rational choice history: A case of excessive ambition. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 685–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Evans, A. J. (2005). Ideas and interests: The flat tax. Open Republic, 1(1).Google Scholar
  41. Evans, A. J. (2006a). The spread of economic theology: The flat tax in Romania. Romanian Economics and Business Review, 1(1).Google Scholar
  42. Evans, A. J. (2006b). Are economic ideas a sustainable commons? A study of the exchange of “Creative” Economics”. Romanian Economics and Business Review (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  43. Evans, A. J., & Aligica, P. D. (2008). The spread of the flat tax in Eastern Europe: A comparative study. Eastern European Economics, 46(3), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Foldvary, F. E., & Klein, D. B. (2003). The half life of policy rationales: How technology affects old policy issues. New York University Press/Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Forbath, W. E. (1999). Constitutional change and the politics of history. The Yale Law Journal, 108(8), 1917–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Gamble, A. (1989). Ideas and interests in British economic policy. In Ideas, interests and consequences. Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  48. Garrett, G., & Weingast, B. R. (1993). Ideas, interests, and institutions. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Garton-Ash, T. (1990). The magic lantern. Random House.Google Scholar
  50. Garton-Ash, T. (1999). History of the present. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  51. George, A. L. (1969). The ‘Operational Code’: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision making. International Studies Quarterly, 23, 190–222.Google Scholar
  52. George, A. L. (1980). Presidential decision making in foreign policy. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  53. Goldstein, J. (1988). Ideas, institutions and American trade policy. International Organization, 42(1), 179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Goldstein, J. (1993). Ideas, interests and American trade policy. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (Eds.). (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions and political change. R Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Haas, P. M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and the Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403.Google Scholar
  57. Haas, P. M. (1990). Saving the Mediterranean, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hall, P. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Harberger, A. (1993). Secrets of success: A handful of heroes. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 83, 343–350.Google Scholar
  61. Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Hayek, F. A. (1949). The intellectuals and socialism. The University of Chicago Law Review, 16(3).Google Scholar
  63. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Hayek, F. A. (1975[1939]). Profits, interest, and investment and other essays on the theory of industrial fluctuations. Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  65. Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty (Vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, legislation and liberty (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Hind, W. (1987). Richard Cobden: A Victorian Outsider New Haven and London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Ikeda, S. (2003). How compatible are public choice and Austrian political economy. Review of Austrian Economics, 16(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. International Organization. (1992). Special Symposium on Epistemic Communities, 46(1).Google Scholar
  70. Irwin, D. A., & Kroszner, R. S. (1999). Interests, institutions, and ideology in securing policy change: The republican conversion to trade liberalization after Smoot-Hawley. Journal of Law and Economics, 42(2), 643–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Jacobson, J. K. (1995). Much Ado about ideas: The cognitive factor in economic policy. World Politics, 47(2), 283–310.Google Scholar
  72. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Lachmann, L. M. (1978[1956]). Capital and it’s structure. Institute for Humane Studies.Google Scholar
  74. Legro, J. W. (2000). The transformation of policy ideas. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture. How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  76. Leuchtenburg, W. E. (1999). When the people spoke, What did they say?: The election of 1936 and the Ackerman thesis. The Yale Law Journal, 108(8), 2077–2114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McCord, N. (1968). The anti-Corn law league, 1838–1846. London.Google Scholar
  78. Melnyck, A. (1989). On ideas and interests. In Ideas, interests and consequences. Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  79. Mises, L. v. (1953[1912]). The theory of money and credit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Mises, L. v. (1956). The anti-capitalistic mentality. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Co.Google Scholar
  81. Mises, L. v. (1998[1949]). Human action. Alabama: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  82. Nelson, R. H. (1991). Reaching for heaven on earth. The theological meaning of economics. Roman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth stagflation and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Olson, M. (1989). How ideas affect societies: Is Britain the wave of the future? In Ideas, interests and consequences. Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  87. Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy and development. American Political Science Review, 87, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ostrom, V. (1997). Meaning of democracy and the vulnerabilities of democracies: A response to tocqueville’s challenge. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  89. Rakove, J. N. (1999). The super-legality of the constitution, or, a federalist critique of Bruce Ackerman’s neo-federalism. The Yale Law Journal, 108(8), 1931–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rawls, J. A. (1971). A theory of justice. Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  91. Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  92. Regulska, J. (1993). Self-governance or central control? Rewriting constitutions in Central and Eastern Europe. In A. E. Dick Howard (Ed.), Constitution making in Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  93. Risse-Kappen, T. (1994). Ideas do not float freely: Transnational coalition, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war. International Organization, 48(2), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rogers, E. M. (1995). The diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.Google Scholar
  95. Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006). From the corn laws to free trade: Interests, ideas and institutions in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  96. Seldon, A. (1989). Economic scholarship and political interest. In Ideas, interests and consequences. Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  97. Shepsle, K. A. (1985). Comment on Derthick and Quirk. In R. G. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social science (pp. 231–237). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  98. Skidelsky, R. (1996). The road from serfdom: The economics and political consequences of the end of communism. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  99. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stigler, G. J. (1978). The literature of economics: The case of the kinked oligopoly demand curve. Economics Inquiry, 16.Google Scholar
  101. The Yale Law Journal. (1999). Symposium: Moments of Change: Transformation in American Constitutionalism, 108(8).Google Scholar
  102. Thomas, C. W. (1997). Public management as interagency cooperation: Testing epistemic community theory at domestic level. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 7(2), 221–246.Google Scholar
  103. Tollison, R., & Anderson, G. (1985). Ideology, interest groups, and the repeal of the Corn Laws. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 141, 197–212.Google Scholar
  104. Tullock, G. (1975). The transitional gains trap. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 6(2), 671–678.Google Scholar
  105. Wagner, R. E. (1994). Economic efficiency, rent seeking, and democracy: Zenoistic variations on coasian themes. In P. J. Boettke & M. J. Rizzo (Eds.), Advances in Austrian economics (Vol. 1, pp. 129–144).Google Scholar
  106. Walsh, J. I. (2000). When do ideas matter? Explaining the successes and failures of Thatcherite ideas. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4), 484–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Weingast, B. R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESCP-EAP European School of ManagementLondonUK

Personalised recommendations