Advertisement

Constraints

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 121–125 | Cite as

Looking into the crystal-ball: a bright future for CP

  • Michela Milano
  • Pascal Van Hentenryck
Article
  • 519 Downloads

References

  1. 1.
    N. Jussien B. O’Sullivan, F.B. (Ed.) (2007). Trends in constraint programming. Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brodsky, A. (1996). Constraint database technology for electronic trade with complex objectives. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 107.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Codognet, P. (1996). The virtuality of constraints and the constraints of virtuality. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dechter, R. (1996). Bucket elimination: a unifying framework for processing hard and soft constraints. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dincbas, M. (1996). Constraint programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freuder, E.C. (1996). In pursuit of the holy grail. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hentenryck, P.V. (1996). Constraint programming for combinatorial search problems. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hentenryck, P.V., & Saraswat, V.A. (1996). Strategic directions in constraint programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4), 701–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hermenegildo, M.V. (1996). Some ccallenges for constraint programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 64.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaffar, J., & Yap, R.H.C. (1996). Constraint programming 2000. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kasif, S. (1996). Towards a constraint-based engineering framework for algorithm design and application. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mackworth, A.K. (1996). Constraint-based design of embedded intelligent systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McAllester, D.A. (1996). The rise of nonlinear mathematical programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McAloon, K. (1996). Constraint-based programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Montanari, U., & Rossi, F. (1996). Constraint solving and programming: what’s next? ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Older, W.J. (1996). Clp (intervals). ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Sullivan, B. (2012). Opportunities and challenges for constraint programming. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 22–26 July 2012. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Puget, J.F. (1996). Future of constraint programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramakrishnan, R. (1996). Constraints in databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saraswat, V.A. (1996). Compositional computing. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smolka, G. (1996). Constraints in oz. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4es), 75.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DISI-University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.NICTA and University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations