Advertisement

Isolation, Chemical Modification, and Anticancer Activity of Major Metabolites of the Lichen Parmotrema mesotropum

  • Uppuluri Venkata MallavadhaniEmail author
  • Reddy Srilakshmi Tirupathamma
  • G. Sagarika
  • Sistla Ramakrishna
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Extensive chromatographic purification of the chloroform–methanol (1:1) extract of the lichen Parmotrema mesotropum led to the isolation of methyl hematommate (1), methyl-2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate (2), orcinol (3), and atranorin (4). The two major metabolites (1 and 2) were subjected to chemical modification and a total of 15 analogues were synthesized. The synthesized analogues and their parent compounds were evaluated for their anticancer potential against a panel of five human cancer cell lines. Among the tested samples, compound 1g showed potent activity against three cancer cell lines, namely DU145 (IC50 20.07 μM), MCF-7 (IC50 20.94 μM), and U87MG (IC50 25.32 μM). This compound can be considered as lead a molecule for further development.

Keywords

Lichen Parmotrema mesotropum methyl hematommate methyl 2,4-dihydroxy-3,6-dimethylbenzoate synthetic analogues anticancer activity 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We are thankful to the Director of CSIR-IICT for keen interest and encouragement. We are also thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for the award of a research fellowship to one of us (RST).

References

  1. 1.
    P. Shukla, D. K. Upreti, S. Nayaka, and P. Tiwari, Indian J. Trad. Knowl., 13, 195 (2014).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Muller, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 56, 9 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. MacGillivray and R. Helleur, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 58, 465 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Rankovic and M. Kosanic, Pak. J. Bot., 44, 429 (2012).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. D. Awasthi, A Compendium of the Macrolichens from India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 248 001, India, 2007, p. 345.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. S. Rojas, B. Lotina-Hennsen, and R. Mata, J. Nat. Prod., 63, 1396 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Sisodia, M. Geol, S. Verma, A. Rani, and P. Dureja, Nat. Prod. Res., 27, 2235 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Iwata, N. Wang, X. Yao, and S. Kitanaka, J. Nat. Prod., 67, 1106 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. G. D. Melo, A. A. S. Araujo, C. P. L. Rocha, E. M. S. A. Almeida, R. D. S. Siqueira, L. R. Bonjardim, and L. J. Quintans, Biol. Pharm. Bull., 31, 1977 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uppuluri Venkata Mallavadhani
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Reddy Srilakshmi Tirupathamma
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Sagarika
    • 3
  • Sistla Ramakrishna
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Natural Products & Traditional Knowledge, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical TechnologyHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Academy of Scientific & Innovative ResearchGhaziabedIndia
  3. 3.Applied Biology Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical TechnologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations