Advertisement

Defining Employment Specialist Competencies: Results of a Participatory Research Study

  • Carina Teixeira
  • E. Sally RogersEmail author
  • Zlatka Russinova
  • Emily M. Lord
Original Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The preponderance of research conducted on supported employment has focused on the structure of interventions with little empirical investigation into the contribution of employment specialists to work outcomes. Using a participatory approach, we identified competencies essential to the role of the employment specialists, operationalized and refined those competencies using the perspectives of experts, service recipients, and employment specialists themselves. We conducted an online survey with 34 candidate items and n = 142 respondents. Results suggested good psychometric properties, stability and coherence of the Vocational Practices and Relationship Scale. A total of n = 23 final items tapping the working alliance coalesced into a strong factor, as did strategies for promoting vocational recovery, suggesting that the scale warrants wide-scale testing for predictive validity. We consider these constructs and competencies to be a potential blueprint for training employment specialists, not only in technical skills and strategies, but also to increase the hope for vocational recovery among those they serve.

Keywords

Provider competencies Employment specialists Vocational recovery Instrument development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was developed with support from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research ARRT 90AR5018 as well as the Dudley Allen Sargent Research Fund of Sargent College at Boston University. NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this project do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, SAMHSA, or HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. The authors are grateful for their support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts.

References

  1. Anthony, W. A., Cohen, M., Farkas, M., & Gagne, C. (2002). Psychiatric rehabilitation (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Boston University, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.Google Scholar
  2. Corbière, M., Brouwers, E., Lanctôt, N., & van Weeghel, J. (2014). Employment specialist competencies for supported employment programs.Google Scholar
  3. Corbière, M., Lecomte, T., Reinharz, D., Kirsh, B., Goering, P., Menear, M., … Goldner, E. (2017). Predictors of Acquisition of Competitive Employment for People Enrolled in Supported Employment Programs. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 205(4), 275-282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Pierrefeu, I., Corbière, M., & Pachoud, B. (2017). Vocational counselors in France: Comparison to competencies of employment specialists working in Canadian IPS programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 53, 871–877.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0109-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., & Becker, D. R. (2012). Individual placement and support: An evidence-based approach to supported employment. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., Goldman, H. H., Hogan, M. F., & Karakus, M. (2016). Individual placement and support services boost employment for people with serious mental illnesses, but funding is lacking. Health Affairs, 35(6), 1098–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreher, K. C., Bond, G. R., & Becker, D. R. (2010). Creation of a measure to assess knowledge of the individual placement and support model. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 33(3), 181–189.  https://doi.org/10.2975/33.3.2010.181.189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldberg, S. B., Hoyt, W. T., Nissen-Lie, H. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Wampold, B. E. (2016). Unpacking the therapist effect: Impact of treatment length differs for high- and low-performing therapists. Psychotherapy Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1216625.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Horvath, A. O. (2005). The therapeutic relationship: Research and theory: An introduction to the special issue. Psychotherapy Research, 15(1–2), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Luciano, A., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. (2014). Is high fidelity to supported employment equally attainable in small and large communities? Community Mental Health Journal, 50, 46–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-013-9687-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Palpacuer, C., Gallet, L., Drapier, D., Reymann, J. M., Falissard, B., & Naudet, F. (2017). Specific and non-specific effects of psychotherapeutic interventions for depression: Results from a meta-analysis of 84 studies. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 87, 95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.12.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Qualtrics Software. (2013). Qualtrics web based survey tool. Copyright 2019 Qualtrics. Qualtrics and all other Qualtrics product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA. http://www.qualtrics.com. Accessed 12 December, 2015.
  14. Rogers, C. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, C. (2007). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(3), 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Russinova, Z., Rogers, E. S., Cook, K. F., Ellison, M. L., & Lyass, A. (2013). Conceptualization and measurement of mental health specialists’ recovery-promoting competence: The recovery promoting relationships scale (RPRS). Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 36(1), 7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Russinova, Z., Rogers, E. S., Ellison, M. L., & Luass, A. (2011). Recovery-promoting professional competencies: Perspectives of mental health consumers, consumer-specialists and specialists. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34(3), 177–185.  https://doi.org/10.2975/34.3.2011.177.185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Individual Placement and Support Employment Center. (2018). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from https://ipsworks.org/.
  19. Taylor, A. C., & Bond, G. R. (2014). Employment specialist competencies as predictors of employment outcomes. Community Mental Health Journal, 50(1), 31–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9554-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Truax, C. B., & Carkhuff, R. R. (2007). Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy: Training and practice. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 270–277.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wampold, B., & Imel, Z. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The research evidence for what works in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitley, R., Kostick, K. M., & Bush, P. W. (2010). Desirable characteristics and competencies of supported employment specialists: An empirically-grounded framework. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37(6), 509–519.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0297-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Willis, G. B. (2014). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carina Teixeira
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Sally Rogers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zlatka Russinova
    • 1
  • Emily M. Lord
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Boston University Center for Psychiatric RehabilitationBostonUSA
  2. 2.University of GreenwichLondonUK
  3. 3.VA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations