A Three Stage Model for Mental Health Treatment Court: A Qualitative Analysis of Graduates’ Perspectives
- 167 Downloads
Mental Health Treatment Courts (MHTC) address the overrepresentation of individuals with mental health disorders in the criminal justice system and strive to minimize the "revolving door" cycle of arrest/incarceration/release/re-arrest. A qualitative research group interview design was conducted with program graduates resulting in a three stage model. Participant’s motivation was initially to avoid jail, but over time participants begin to make intentional choices leading to mental health recovery. Participants also described the importance of their relationship with the staff and the judge as well as the need for trust, understanding, and respect throughout the program. Recommendations for future research and program development are discussed.
KeywordsTreatment courts Psychiatric rehabilitation Mental illness and incarceration Empowerment Recovery
Funding was provided by University of Scranton.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Lee Ann Eschbach, Rebecca Spirito Dalgin were funded to complete an evaluation of the program in this study in 2017. Elizabeth Pantucci has no conflicts of interest on this project.
Full IRB approval was granted for this study and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in this study.
- Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Innovations & Research, 2, 17–24.Google Scholar
- Anthony, W. A., Cohen, M. A., Farkas, M., & Gagne, C. (2002). Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Boston: The Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Council of State Government Justice Center. (2016). Mental Health Treatment Courts. Retrieved from https://www.csgjusticecenter.org/mental-health-court-project/.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Hora, P., Schma, W., & Rosenthal, J. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(2), 499.Google Scholar
- James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report: Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5946.
- Lurigio, A. J., & Snowden, J. (2009). Putting therapeutic jurisprudence into practice: The growth, operations, and effectiveness of a mental health court. Justice System Journal, 30(2), 196–218.Google Scholar
- Smith-Acuna, S. (2011). Systems theory in action: Applications to individual, couples, and family therapy. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Wexler, D., & Winick, B. (Eds.). (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Wolff, N. (2002). Courts as therapeutic agents: Thinking past the novelty of mental health courts. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(3), 215–226.Google Scholar