Advertisement

Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 1199–1211 | Cite as

“Pushing the Boat Out”: A Meta-synthesis of How Members, Staff and Family Experience the Clubhouse Model

  • Liv Grethe KinnEmail author
  • Kimiko Tanaka
  • Cheryll Bellamy
  • Larry Davidson
Original Paper

Abstract

To explore how member, staff, and family experience the contributions of the clubhouse model to outcomes for adults with severe mental illness. Given the significant role social and vocational arenas play in promoting wellbeing, irrespective of health status, explorations of the role such arenas can play in helping individuals accomplish their life and vocational goals may be useful in guiding policy and practice. A metaethnography was conducted using 11 qualitative studies published between 2000 and 2015. Four themes and an overarching metaphor were identified: (1) Stepping out of limiting realities; (2) anchoring; (3) creating ways of flourishing; and (4) prospects of a life outside the clubhouse. “Pushing out the boat” as a metaphor holds promise in facilitating discussions about the subjective outcomes of the clubhouse model and for expanding knowledge about clubhouses as multi-dimensional programs that provide social, educational, and vocational opportunities for adults recovering from mental health problems. Our findings show that clubhouses are valuable communities for meaningful doings for individuals to build self-confidence, relations, and perspective—all crucial for processes of recovery. Clubhouses provide people a place to establish an anchor in a supportive environment where they can try things out and regain their self-confidence. From there, they may choose to push their boat out. However, many members might need to choose not to—the seas may be too rough or their boat may not yet be strong enough for the journey. Further research is needed to examine members’ experiences with integration into mainstream social networks and employment. It will also be important to examine how practitioners can intentionally interact with Clubhouse members and their families to promote the individuals processes of social integration outside the clubhouse.

Keywords

Persons with psyciatric disabilities Psychosocial rehabilitation Vocational guidance Work Review 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Norwegian Occupational Therapist Association financially supported the research for this paper.

Funding

Norwegian Occupational Therapist Association financially supported this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biegel, D. E., Pernice-Duca, F. M., Chang, C. W., Chung, C. L., Min, M. O., & D’Angelo, L. (2013). Family social networks and recovery from severe mental illness of clubhouse members. Journal of Family Social Work, 16(4), 274–296.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2013.794379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boutillier, C. L., Leamy, M., Bird, V., Davidson, L., Williams, J., & Slade, S. (2011). What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international, recovery-oriented practice guidance. Psychiatric Services, 62(12), 1470–1476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0585-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 7, 209–215.  https://doi.org/10.1258/135581902320432732.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carolan, M., Onaga, E., Pernice-Duca, F., & Jimenez, T. (2011). A place to be: The role of clubhouses in facilitating social support. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35(2), 125–132.  https://doi.org/10.2975/35.2.2011.125.132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, F. P. (2017). Building a working community: Staff practices in a clubhouse for people with severe mental illness. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 44(5), 651–663.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0757-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clubhouse International. (2016). International Standards for Clubhouse Programs. Retrieved from http://www.iccd.org/quality.html.
  8. Coniglio, F. D., Hancock, N., & Ellis, L. A. (2012). Peer SUPPORT WITHIN CLUBHOUSE: A grounded theory study. Community Mental Health Journal, 48(2), 153–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9358-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, L. (2003). Living outside mental illness: Qualitative studies of recovery in schizophrenia. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dorio, J., Guitar, A., Solheim, L., Dvorkin, C., & Marine, S. (2002). Differences in job retention in a supported employment program Chinook Clubhouse. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(3), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallagher, M., Muldoon, O. T., & Pettigrew, J. (2015). An integrative review of social and occupational factors influencing health and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrard, J. (2014). Health sciences literature review made easy: The matrix method (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Gumber, S., & Stein, C. H. (2017). Beyond these walls: Can psychosocial clubhouses promote the socila integration of adults with serious mental illness in the community? Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammel, K. W. (2014). Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: An exploration. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(1), 39–50.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174113520489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammer, K., Mogensen, O., & Hall, E. O. (2009). The meaning of hope in nursing research: A meta-synthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 23(3), 549–557.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00635.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hancock, N., Honey, A., & Bundy, A. (2015). Sources of meaning derived from occupational engagement for people recovering from mental illness. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78(8), 508–515.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022614562789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kang, S. K., & Kim, E. H. (2014). A phenomenological study of the lived experiences of Koreans with mental illness. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(4), 468–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2014.905164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy-Jones, M., Cooper, J., & Fossey, E. (2005). Developing a worker role: Stories of four people with mental illness. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 116–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00475.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kielhofner, G. (2008). Doing and becoming. In Kielhofner, G. (Ed.), Model of human occupation: Theory and application (4 th ed., pp. 101–109). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  20. Kinn, L. G., Holgersen, H., Ekeland, T. J., & Davidson, L. (2013). Metasynthesis and bricolage: An artistic exercise of creating a collage of meaning. Qualitative Health Research, 23(9), 1285–1292.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313502127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. McKay, C., Nugent, K. L., Johnsen, M., Eaton, W. W., & Lidz, C. W. (2016). A systematic review of evidence for the clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKay, C. E., Osterman, R., Shaffer, J., Sawyer, E., Gerrard, E., & Olivera, N. (2012). Adapting services to engage young adults in ICCD Clubhouses. International center for clubhouse development. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35(3), 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray, C., & Stanley, M. (2015). Meta-synthesis demystified. Connecting islands of knowledge. In S. Nayar & M. Stanley (Eds.), Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and therapy (1 edn, pp. 174–190). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norman, C. (2006). The Fountain House movement, an alternative rehabilitation model for people with mental health problems, members’ descriptions of what works. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 20(2), 184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00398.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pernice-Duca, F. M. (2008). The structure and quality of social network support among mental health consumers of clubhouse programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 36(7), 929–946.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pernice-Duca, F., Biegel, D. E., Hess, H. R., Chung, C. L., & Chang, C. W. (2015). Family members’ perceptions of how they benefit when relatives living with serious mental illness participate in clubhouse community programs. Family Relations, 64(3), 446–459.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perrins-Margalis, N. M., Rugletic, J., Schepis, N. M., Stepanski, H. R., & Walsh, M. A. (2000). The immediate effects of a group-based horticulture experience on the quality of life of persons with chronic mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 16(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phelan, S., & Kinsella, A. K. (2009). Occupational identity: Engaging socio-cultural perspectives. Journal of Occupational Science, 16(2), 85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2009.9686647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raeburn, T., Halcomb, E., Walter, G., & Cleary, M. (2013). An overview of the clubhouse model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Australian Psychiatry, 21(4), 376–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raeburn, T., Schmied, V., Hungerford, C., & Cleary, M. (2015). Self-determination theory: A Framework for clubhouse psychosocial rehabilitation research. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 36(2), 145–151.  https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2014.927544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiff, J. W., Coleman, H., & Miner, D. (2008). Voluntary participation in rehabilitation: Lessons learned from a clubhouse environment. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 27(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stige, B., Malterud, K., & Midtgarden, T. (2009). Toward an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1504–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309348501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanaka, K., & Davidson, L. (2015a). Meanings associated with the core component of clubhouse life: The work-ordered day. Psychiatric Quarterly, 86(2), 269–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-014-9330-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanaka, K., & Davidson, L. (2015b). Reciprocity in the clubhouse context. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 19(2), 21–33.Google Scholar
  37. Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 311–318.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Masters Program in Mental Health and Substance Abuse CareWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, Program on Recovery and Community Health, School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations