Advertisement

Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 245–251 | Cite as

Implementing a Violence Risk Screening Protocol in a Civil Psychiatric Setting: Preliminary Results and Clinical Policy Implications

  • Merrill Rotter
  • Barry Rosenfeld
Original Paper

Abstract

Comprehensive violence risk assessment can require substantial time and resources, which may be challenging for an already strapped public mental health system. Herein, we describe a naturalistic study of the Fordham Risk Screening Tool (“FRST”), a violence risk screening instrument designed to quickly identify individuals for whom thorough violence risk assessment would be advisable. All patients admitted to one of three state hospitals during the study period received FRST screening and HCR-20V3 risk assessment. The FRST reliably and accurately identified individuals deemed high risk by the HCR-20V3. The implications of these findings, and the broader clinical policy choices are reviewed.

Keywords

Violence Risk assessment Screening Triage 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Neither author has a financial or non-financial conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

Because this study was implemented as a pilot project to improve the accuracy and quality of violence risk assessments, all data were extracted from the electronic medical record, without any identifying information. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the New York State Office of Mental Health/Nathan Kline Institute.

Informed Consent

The study was granted a waiver of informed consent by the IRB.

References

  1. Almvik, R., & Woods, P. (1999). Predicting inpatient violence using the Broset Violence Checklist (BVC). The International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research, 4(3), 498–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, P. S., & Swanson, J. W. (2010). Law & psychiatry: Gun laws and mental illness—how sensible are the current restrictions? Psychiatric Services, 61(7), 652–654.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørkly, S., Hartvig, P., Heggen, F. A., Brauer, H., & Moger, T. A. (2009). Development of a brief screen for violence risk (V-RISK-10) in acute and general psychiatry: An introduction with emphasis on findings from a naturalistic test of interrater reliability. European Psychiatry, 24(6), 388–394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, A., Binder, R., Norko, M., & Swartz, M. (2012). Psychiatric violence risk assessment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(3), 340–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 V3: Assessing risk for violence: user guide. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  6. Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1992). Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence? Law and Human Behavior, 16(6), 621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Iozzino, L., Ferrari, C., Large, M., Nielssen, O., & De Girolamo, G. (2015). Prevalence and risk factors of violence by psychiatric acute inpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (1994). Screening for risk of inpatient violence: Validation of an actuarial tool. Law and Human Behavior, 18(5), 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. New York State/New York City Mental Health-Criminal Justice Panel Report and Recommendations. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/pio/mh-cjreport.pdf.
  10. Ogloff, J. R., & Daffern, M. (2006). The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: An instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(6), 799–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pinals, D., & Mossman, D. (2012). Evaluation for civil commitment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Prins, H. (2005). Mental disorder and violent crime: A problematic relationship. Probation Journal, 52(4), 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenfeld, B., Foellmi, M., Howe, J., & Rotter, M. (2013). Development and validation of the Bronx Risk Screening Tool (BRST). In Paper presented at the 12th annual meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Maastricht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenfeld, B., Foellmi, M., Khadivi, A., Wijetunga, C., Howe, J., Nijdam-Jones, A., … Rotter, M. (2017). Determining when to conduct a violence risk assessment: development and initial validation of the Fordham Risk Screening Tool (FRST). Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shah, S. A. (1975). Dangerousness and civil commitment of the mentally ill: Some public policy considerations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132(5), 501–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharfstein, S. S., & Dickerson, F. B. (2009). Hospital psychiatry for the twenty-first century. Health Affairs, 28(3), 685–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Soulier, M. F., Maislen, A., & Beck, J. C. (2009). Status of the psychiatric duty to protect, circa 2006. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(4), 457–473.Google Scholar
  18. Steadman, H. J., Mulvey, E. P., Monahan, J., Robbins, P. C., Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., … Silver, E. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(5), 393–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Swanson, J. W., Holzer, C. E., Ganju, V. K., & Jono, R. T. (1990). Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: Evidence from the epidemiologic catchment area surveys. Psychiatric Services, 41(7), 761–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Testa, M., & West, S. G. (2010). Civil commitment in the United States. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 7(10), 30.Google Scholar
  21. Torrey, E. F., Kennard, A. D., Eslinger, D., Lamb, R., & Pavle, J. (2010). More mentally ill persons are in jails and prisons than hospitals: A survey of the states. Arlington, VA: Treatment Adv.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merrill Rotter
    • 1
  • Barry Rosenfeld
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyFordham UniversityBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations