Assessing the Impact and Effectiveness of Hearing Voices Network Self-Help Groups

Brief Report

Abstract

The Hearing Voices Network (HVN) is an influential service-user led organisation that promotes self-help as an important aspect of recovery. This study presents the first systematic assessment of the impact and effectiveness of HVN self-help groups. A customized 45-item questionnaire, the Hearing Voices Groups Survey, was sent to 62 groups affiliated with the English HVN. 101 responses were received. Group attendance was credited with a range of positive emotional, social and clinical outcomes. Aspects that were particularly valued included: opportunities to meet other voice hearers, provision of support that was unavailable elsewhere, and the group being a safe and confidential place to discuss difficult issues. Participants perceived HVN groups to facilitate recovery processes and to be an important resource for helping them cope with their experiences. Mental health professionals can use their expertise to support the successful running of these groups.

Keywords

Group psychotherapy Outpatient treatment Psychosocial interventions Psychotic disorders Social functioning Vocational rehabilitation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was received from the Committee on Research Ethics at the University of Liverpool and all participants provided written consent. Funding for this study was received from the Hearing the Voice project at the University of Durham, which is funded by a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award. Jacqui Dillon and Eleanor Longden have a non-financial professional association with the Hearing Voices Network and Jacqui Dillon provides paid training on facilitating and supporting hearing voices groups.

References

  1. Barrowclough, C., Haddock, G., Lobban, F., Jones, S., Siddle, R., Roberts, C., & Gregg, L. (2006). Group cognitive–behavioural therapy for schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189(6), 527–532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Corstens, D., Longden, E., McCarthy-Jones, S., Waddingham, R., & Thomas, N. (2014). Emerging perspectives from the hearing voices movement: Implications for research and practice. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(S4), S285–S294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Dillon, J., & Hornstein, G. A. (2013). Hearing voices peer support groups: A powerful alternative for people in distress. Psychosis, 5(3), 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dillon, J., & Longden, E. (2012). Hearing voices groups: Creating safe spaces to share taboo experiences. In M. Romme & S. Escher (Eds.), Psychosis as a personal crisis: An experience based approach (pp. 129–139). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Dos Santos, B., & Beavan, V. (2015). Qualitatively exploring hearing voices network support groups. Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 10(1), 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Downs, J. (2005). Coping with voices and visions. Manchester: The Hearing Voices Network.Google Scholar
  7. Goodliffe, L., Hayward, M., Brown, D., Turton, W., & Dannahy, L. (2010). Group person-based cognitive therapy for distressing voices: Views from the hearers. Psychotherapy Research, 20(4), 447–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hendry, G. L. (2011). What are the experiences of those attending a self-help hearing voices group: An interpretative phenomenological approach (D.Clin.Psychol dissertation). Retrieved from White Rose eTheses http://www.etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1757/.
  9. James, A. (2001). Raising our voices: An account of the Hearing Voices Movement. Gloucester. England: Handsell.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, N., Marino, C. K., & Hansen, M. C. (2016). The Hearing Voices Movement in the United States: Findings from a national survey of group facilitators. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches, 8(2), 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Longden, E., Corstens, D., & Dillon, J. (2013). Recovery, discovery and revolution: The work of Intervoice and the hearing voices movement. In S. Coles, S. Keenan & B. Diamond (Eds.), Madness contested: Power and practice, pp. 161–80. Ross-on-Wye. England: PCCS.Google Scholar
  12. Oakland, L., & Berry, K. (2015). “Lifting the veil”: A qualitative analysis of experiences in Hearing Voices Network groups. Psychosis, 7(2), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Romme, M. (2009). Hearing voices groups. In M. Romme, S. Escher, D. Corstens, J. Dillon & M. Morris (Eds.), Living with voices: Fifty stories of recovery. Ross-on-Wye, pp. 73–85. England: PCCS.Google Scholar
  14. Romme, M., & Escher, S. (1993). Accepting voices. London: Mind.Google Scholar
  15. Romme, M., & Escher, S. (2000). Making sense of voices. London: Mind.Google Scholar
  16. Romme, M., Escher, S., Dillon, J., Corstens, D., & Morris, M. (2009). Living with voices: Fifty stories of recovery. Ross-on-Wye. England: PCCS.Google Scholar
  17. Woods, A. (2013). The voice-hearer. Journal of Mental Health, 22(3), 263–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wykes, T., Hayward, P., Thomas, N., Green, N., Surguladze, S., Fannon, D., & Landau, S. (2005). What are the effects of group cognitive behaviour therapy for voices? A randomised control trial. Schizophrenia Research, 77(2–3), 201–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Psychology, Health and SocietyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of East LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.National Hearing Voices NetworkSheffieldUK
  4. 4.Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations