Analysis of the Association of Clubhouse Membership with Overall Costs of Care for Mental Health Treatment
We examined whether frequency of attendance at the B’More Clubhouse was associated with lower mental health care costs in the Medicaid database, and whether members in the B’More Clubhouse (n = 30) would have lower mental health care costs compared with a set of matched controls from the same claims database (n = 150). Participants who attended the Clubhouse 3 days or more per week had mean 1-year mental health care costs of US $5697, compared to $14,765 for those who attended less often. B’More Clubhouse members had significantly lower annual total mental health care costs than the matched comparison group ($10,391 vs. $15,511; p < 0.0001). Membership in the B’More Clubhouse is associated with a substantial beneficial influence on health care costs.
KeywordsClubhouse Mental health Cost Medicaid
- Accordino, M. P., & Herbert, J. T. (2000). Treatment outcome of four rehabilitation interventions for persons with serious mental illness. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22(3), 268–282.Google Scholar
- Beard, J. H., Propst, R. N., & Malamud, T. J. (1982). Fountain house model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5(1), 47–53.Google Scholar
- Macias, C., Propst, R., Rodican, C., & Boyd, J. (2001). Strategic planning for ICCD clubhouse implementation: Development of the clubhouse research and evaluation screening survey (CRESS). International center for clubhouse development. Mental Health Services Research, 3(3), 155–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2013). SAMHSA’s national registry of evidence based programs and practices. Retrieved February 7, 2013, from http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/.
- Weintraub, W. S., Deaton, C., Shaw, L., Mahoney, E., Morris, D. C., Saunders, C., Boccuzzi, S. J., et al. (1999). Can cardiovascular clinical characteristics be identified and outcome models be developed from an in-patient claims database? The American Journal of Cardiology, 84(2), 166–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar