Embodying Recovery: A Qualitative Study of Peer Work in a Consumer-Run Service Setting
The use of peer support for persons with mental illness has been gaining force. While research has demonstrated the benefits of peer support, few studies have investigated the qualitative characteristics of how peer support aids persons recovering from mental illness. Therefore, this study sought to clarify the characteristics that constitute peer support and its contribution to recovery. We conducted ethnographic fieldwork and semi-structured interviews with nine peer advocates at a consumer-run organization in New York City, and identified three themes that describe how peer support influences recovery: transforming experience into expertise, understanding the mechanics of peer support, and launching peers towards their own recovery. Peer support plays a critical role in helping clients move beyond their patient role to an empowered sense of personhood. Additionally, the value of peer support highlights current deficiencies within the mental health system and how a bolder shift towards recovery might repair them.
KeywordsPeers Peer support Recovery Agency
This research was supported by the Center for the Study of Issues in Public Mental Health, funded by a Grant from the National Institutes of Mental Health (P20-MH078188).
- Angell, B., Mahoney, C. A., & Martinez, N. I. (2006). Promoting treatment adherence in assertive community treatment. Social Science Review, 80(3), 485–526.Google Scholar
- Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and Public Action (pp. 59–84). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chamberlin, J. (1978). On our own: Patient controlled alternatives to the mental health system. New York: Hawthorn.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Kloos, B., Weingarten, R., Stayner, D., & Tebes, J. K. (1999). Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 165–187.Google Scholar
- Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America, President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Final Report (DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3892). Department of Health and Human Services, US Public Health Service, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Goldstrom, I. D., Campbell, J., Rogers, J. A., Lambert, D. B., Blacklow, B., Henderson, M. J., et al. (2006). National estimates for mental health mutual support groups, self-help organizations, and consumer-operated services. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 33(1), 92–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopper, K. (2006). Redistribution and its discontents: On the prospects of committed work in public mental health and like settings. Human Organization, 65(2), 218–226.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, N. (2004). In recovery: The making of mental health policy. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
- Moran, G. S., Russinova, Z. Gidugu, V., & Gagne, C. (2012). Challenges experienced by paid peer providers in mental health recovery: a qualitative study. Community Mental Health Journal, epub ahead of print. PMID: 23117937.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. S., Kash-MacDonald, M., & Brucker, D. (2009). Systematic Review of Peer Delivered Services Literature 1989–2009. Boston: Boston University, Sargent College, Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, http://www.bu.edu/drrk/research-syntheses/psychiatric-disabilities/peer-delivered-services/.
- Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stastny, P., & Lehmann, P. (Eds.). (2007). Alternatives beyond psychiatry. Berlin: Peter Lehmann Publishing.Google Scholar