Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 420–430 | Cite as

Consumer Empowerment and Self-Advocacy Outcomes in a Randomized Study of Peer-Led Education

  • Susan A. Pickett
  • Sita M. Diehl
  • Pamela J. Steigman
  • Joy D. Prater
  • Anthony Fox
  • Patricia Shipley
  • Dennis D. Grey
  • Judith A. Cook
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of the Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals (BRIDGES) peer-led education intervention in empowering mental health consumers to become better advocates for their own care. A total of 428 adults with mental illness were randomly assigned to BRIDGES (intervention condition) or a services as usual wait list (control condition). Interviews were conducted at enrollment, at the end of the intervention, and 6-months post-intervention. Random regression results indicate that, compared to controls, BRIDGES participants experienced significant increases in overall empowerment, empowerment-self-esteem, and self-advocacy-assertiveness, and maintained these improved outcomes over time. Peer-led education interventions may provide participants with the information, skills and support they need to become more actively involved in the treatment decision-making process.

Keywords

Peer-led education interventions Consumer empowerment Patient self-advocacy Recovery education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funded by the US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, under Cooperative Agreement H133B05003B. The views expressed in this manuscript do not reflect the policy or position of any Federal agency.

References

  1. Adams, J. R., Drake, R., & Wolford, G. L. (2007). Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 9, 1219–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alegria, M., Polo, A., Gao, S., Santana, L., Rothstein, D., Jimenez, A., et al. (2008). Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Medical Care, 46(3), 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (revised (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. Barbic, S., Krupa, T., & Armstrong, I. (2009). A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a modified recovery workbook program: Preliminary findings. Psychiatric Services, 60(4), 491–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Miniucci, D. S., Ory, M., et al. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brashers, D. E. (1995, May). Communication and the management of uncertainty: The case of AIDS and HIV-infected patients. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  7. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., & Neidig, J. L. (1999). The patient self-advocacy scale: Measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Communications, 11(2), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., Neidig, J. L., & Rintamaki, L. S. (2002). Social activism, self-advocacy, and coping with HIV illness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(1), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byerly, M. J., Nakonezny, P. A., & Lescouflair, E. (2007). Antipsychotic medication adherence in schizophrenia. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 30, 437–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. (2005). The historical and philosophical development of peer-run support programs. In S. Clay, B. Schell, P. W. Corrigan, & R. O. Ralph (Eds.), On our own, together: Peer programs for people with mental illness (pp. 17–64). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, J. A., Jonikas, J. A., & Razzano, L. A. (1995). A randomized evaluation of consumer versus non-consumer training of state mental health service providers. Community Mental Health Journal, 31(3), 229–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, J. A., Steigman, P., Pickett, S., Diehl, S., Fox, A., Shipley, P., MacFarlane, R., Grey, D. D., & Burke-Miller, J. K. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through education and support (BRIDGES). Schizoprhenia Research, 136(1), 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper-Patrick, L., Gallo, J., Gonzales, J., et al. (1999). Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA, 282, 583–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corrigan, P. W., Faber, D., Rashid, F., & Leary, M. (1999). The construct validity of empowerment among consumers of mental health services. Schizophrenia Research, 38, 77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane-Ross, D., Roth, D., & Lauber, B. (2000). Consumers’ and case managers’ perceptions of mental health and community support service needs. Community Mental Health Journal, 36(2), 161–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diehl, S. M., & Baxter, E. A. (Eds.). (2002). Back from where I’ve been. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, J., Barker, P., Vorburger, M., & Murtha, C. (2002). Serious mental illness and its co-occurrence with substance use disorders. DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3905, Analytic Series A-24. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, E. P., Shumway, M., & Owen, R. R. (2002). Priorities of consumers, providers and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 53, 724–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., Elkin, I., Waternaux, C., Kraemer, H. C., Greenhouse, J. B., et al. (1993). Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data: Application of NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program dataset. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 739–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gluud, L. L. (2006). Bias in clinical intervention research. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(6), 493–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guttman, N. (1993). Patient-practitioner information exchange as an asymmetrical social encounter: Do patients actually know what their practitioners think they know? In J. R. Schement & B. D. Ruben (Eds.), Between communication and information: Information and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 293–318). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  22. Hamann, J., Langer, B., Winkler, V., Busch, R., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., et al. (2006). Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 114(4), 265–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hermansen-Kobulnicky, C. J. (2008). Measurement of self-advocacy in cancer patients and survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 16, 613–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonikas, J. A., Grey, D. D., Copeland, M. E., Razzano, L. A., Hamilton, M. A., Bailey Floyd, C. et al. (2011). Improving propensity for patient self-advocacy through wellness recovery action planning: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Community Mental Health Journal. Published on line 14 Dec 2011.Google Scholar
  25. Loh, A., Simona, D., Wills, C. E., Kristona, L., Niebling, W., & Härter, M. (2007). The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 67(3), 324–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. New Freedom Commission. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Final report (Pub No. SMA-03-3832). Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  27. O’Neal, E. L., Adams, J., McHugo, G., Van Citters, A., Drake, R., & Bartels, S. (2008). Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 826–833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Onken, S. J. (2004). Contextualizing self-determination within a mental health recovery-oriented service and support system. In J. A. Jonikas & J. A. Cook (Eds.), The UIC NRTC’s national self-determination and psychiatric disability invitational conference: Conference papers. Chicago, IL: UIC National Research and Training Center on Psychiatric Disability.Google Scholar
  29. Pickett, S. A., Diehl, S., Steigman, P. J., Prater, J., Fox, A., & Cook, J. A. (2010). Early outcomes and lessons learned from a study of the Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through education and support (BRIDGES) program in Tennessee. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34(2), 96–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pyne, J. M., McSweeney, J., Kane, H. S., Harvey, S., Bragg, L., & Fisher, E. (2006). Agreement between patients with schizophrenia and providers on factors of antipsychotic medication adherence. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1170–1178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ralph, R. O. (2000). Recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills, 4, 480–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48(8), 1042–1047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers, E. S., Teague, G. B., Lichenstein, C., Campbell, J., Lyass, A., Chen, R., et al. (2007). Effects of participation in consumer-operated service programs on both personal and organizationally mediated empowerment: Results of multisite study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44, 785–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roter, D. L., & Frankel, R. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 1097–1103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roth, D., & Crane-Ross, D. (2002). Impact of services, met needs, and service empowerment on consumer outcomes. Mental Health Services Research, 4(1), 43–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roth, D., Crane-Ross, D., Hannon, M., Cusick, G., & Doklovic, S. (1998). Longitudinal study of mental health services and consumer outcomes in a changing system. In D. Roth (Ed.), New research in mental health (Vol. 13, pp. 104–116). Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  37. Salzer, M., & Shear, S. L. (2002). Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 281–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Schutt, R. K., & Rogers, E. S. (2009). Empowerment and peer support: Structure and process of self-help in a consumer-run center for individuals with mental illness. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(6), 697–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical elements. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 392–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Volk, R. J., Jibaja-Weiss, M. L., Hawley, S. T., Kneuper, Z., Spann, S. J., Miles, B. J., et al. (2008). Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: A randomized trail among primary care patients with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 73, 482–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wowra, S. A., & McCarter, R. (1999). Validation of the Empowerment Scale with an outpatient mental health population. Psychiatric Services, 50, 959–961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conception. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan A. Pickett
    • 1
  • Sita M. Diehl
    • 2
  • Pamela J. Steigman
    • 1
  • Joy D. Prater
    • 3
  • Anthony Fox
    • 3
  • Patricia Shipley
    • 1
  • Dennis D. Grey
    • 1
  • Judith A. Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.National Alliance on Mental IllnessArlingtonUSA
  3. 3.Tennessee Mental Health Consumers AssociationNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations