Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 166–171 | Cite as

Uptake of Web-Based Clinical Resources from the MacArthur Initiative on Depression and Primary Care

  • Changsu Han
  • Corrine I. Voils
  • John W. WilliamsJr.
Brief Report

Abstract

This study assessed the usability and desired enhancements for the MacArthur Foundation’s Depression and Primary Care (MDPC) Web site to determine if resources for integrated depression care that are disseminated through the Web site are incorporated into routine clinical care. Since its launch in 2003, more than 20,000 users registered as members of the MDPC website to read and download depression care resources. Subjects were randomly selected from MDPC Web site users who had previously downloaded the depression toolkit. Web-based survey, which was administered anonymously, included the following domains: (1) socio-demographic data, (2) confidence in managing depression (3) Web site content and design features, (4) desired enhancements to Web site and content, (5) use of resources downloaded from the Web site, and (6) importance of depression care resources. Of the 3,478 randomly selected participants, 666 (19.1%) responded. Web site content was rated “good” or “excellent” for screening and diagnosis (84.3%), treatment (69.8%), patient education (66.2%), and care management (66.9%). The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was rated “very useful” by 68.3%; 47.1% reported using it in at least 25% of encounters with patients who are depressed. PHQ-9 use was significantly associated with higher self-confidence in managing depression (P = 0.05). Evidence-based resources for depression care can be disseminated effectively through a dedicated Web site and may help clinicians incorporate effective care models into routine practice.

Keywords

Depression care Primary care Web-based medical information 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

References

  1. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, J. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cook, D. A., Levinson, A. J., Garside, S., Dupras, D. M., Erwin, P. J., & Montori, V. M. (2008). Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 300(10), 1181–1196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Couper, M. P., Peytchev, A., Strecher, V. J., Rothert, K., & Anderson, J. (2007). Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(2), e16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dietrich, A. J., Oxman, T. E., Williams, J. W., Jr., Kroenke, K., Schulberg, H. C., Bruce, M., et al. (2004a). Going to scale: re-engineering systems for primary care treatment of depression. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(4), 301–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dietrich, A. J., Oxman, T. E., Williams, J. W., Jr., Schulberg, H. C., Bruce, M. L., Lee, P. W., et al. (2004b). Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 329(7466), 602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2002). Vital decisions. How internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  8. Gerrity, M. S., Cole, S. A., Dietrich, A. J., & Barrett, J. E. (1999). Improving the recognition and management of depression: is there a role for physician education? Journal of Family Practice, 48(12), 949–957.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbody, S., Bower, P., Fletcher, J., Richards, D., & Sutton, A. J. (2006a). Collaborative care for depression: A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(21), 2314–2321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbody, S., Bower, P., & Whitty, P. (2006b). Costs and consequences of enhanced primary care for depression: systematic review of randomised economic evaluations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 297–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2000). Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: Cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 321(7275), 1511–1515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kellerman, S. E., & Herold, J. (2001). Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(1), 61–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Oxman, T. E., Dietrich, A. J., Williams, J. W., Jr., & Kroenke, K. (2002). A three-component model for reengineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care. Psychosomatics, 43(6), 441–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Powell, J., & Clarke, A. (2002). The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, what, and why? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(1), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Rae, D. S., Manderscheid, R. W., Locke, B. Z., & Goodwin, F. K. (1993). The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(2), 85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Richards, D. A., Lankshear, A. J., Fletcher, J., Rogers, A., Barkham, M., Bower, P., et al. (2006). Developing a UK protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28(4), 296–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schulberg, H. C., Katon, W. J., Simon, G. E., & Rush, A. J. (1999). Best clinical practice: Guidelines for managing major depression in primary medical care. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60(Suppl 7), 19–26. discussion 27–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Simon, G. E., Lin, E. H., Katon, W., Saunders, K., VonKorff, M., Walker, E., et al. (1995). Outcomes of “inadequate” antidepressant treatment. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10(12), 663–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient health questionnaire. JAMA, 282(18), 1737–1744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Torrey, W. C., Drake, R. E., Dixon, L., Burns, B. J., Flynn, L., Rush, A. J., et al. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 52(1), 45–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams, J. W., Jr., Gerrity, M., Holsinger, T., Dobscha, S., Gaynes, B., & Dietrich, A. (2007). Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care. General Hospital Psychiatry, 29(2), 91–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, J. W., Jr., Rost, K., Dietrich, A. J., Ciotti, M. C., Zyzanski, S. J., & Cornell, J. (1999). Primary care physicians’ approach to depressive disorders. Effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Archives of Family Medicine, 8(1), 58–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (Outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changsu Han
    • 1
    • 2
  • Corrine I. Voils
    • 4
  • John W. WilliamsJr.
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryKorea University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Ansan citySouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine, Clinical Research Training ProgramDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  4. 4.Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMCDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations