Criminal Justice Involvement, Behavioral Health Service Use, and Costs of Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: A Randomized Trial
- 1k Downloads
Jail diversion and forensic community treatment programs have proliferated over the past decade, far outpacing evidence regarding their efficacy. The current study reports findings from a randomized clinical trial conducted in California for frequent jail users with serious mental illness that compares a forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) intervention with treatment as usual (TAU). Outcomes are reported at 12 and 24 months post-randomization for criminal justice outcomes, behavioral health services and costs. At 12 months, FACT vs. TAU participants had fewer jail bookings, greater outpatient contacts, and fewer hospital days than did TAU participants. Results of zero-inflated negative binomial regression found that FACT participants had a higher probability of avoiding jail, although once jailed, the number of jail days did not differ between groups. Increased outpatient costs resulting from FACT outpatient services were partially offset by decreased inpatient and jail costs. The findings for the 24 month period followed the same pattern. These findings provide additional support for the idea that providing appropriate behavioral health services can reduce criminal justice involvement.
KeywordsJail diversion Mental illness Forensic assertive community treatment
- California Board of Corrections. (2004). Mentally ill offenders crime reduction grant program: Annual report to the legislature. Retrieved February, 2005, from California Board of Corrections web site: http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/cppd/miocrg/2004_annual-report/miocrg_2004_annual_report.doc.
- Chandler, D., Spicer, G., Wagner, M., & Hargreaves, W. (1999). Cost effectiveness of a capitated assertive community treatment program. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 22, 327–336.Google Scholar
- Council of State Government. (2005). Criminal justice/mental health consensus project. New York, NY: Council of State Governments/Eastern Regional Conference.Google Scholar
- Teplin, L.A. (2000). Keeping the peace: Police discretion and mentally ill persons. National Institute of Justice Journal.Google Scholar