Advertisement

Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 356–363 | Cite as

Criminal Justice Involvement, Behavioral Health Service Use, and Costs of Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: A Randomized Trial

  • Karen J. CusackEmail author
  • Joseph P. Morrissey
  • Gary S. Cuddeback
  • Annabel Prins
  • David M. Williams
Original Paper

Abstract

Jail diversion and forensic community treatment programs have proliferated over the past decade, far outpacing evidence regarding their efficacy. The current study reports findings from a randomized clinical trial conducted in California for frequent jail users with serious mental illness that compares a forensic assertive community treatment (FACT) intervention with treatment as usual (TAU). Outcomes are reported at 12 and 24 months post-randomization for criminal justice outcomes, behavioral health services and costs. At 12 months, FACT vs. TAU participants had fewer jail bookings, greater outpatient contacts, and fewer hospital days than did TAU participants. Results of zero-inflated negative binomial regression found that FACT participants had a higher probability of avoiding jail, although once jailed, the number of jail days did not differ between groups. Increased outpatient costs resulting from FACT outpatient services were partially offset by decreased inpatient and jail costs. The findings for the 24 month period followed the same pattern. These findings provide additional support for the idea that providing appropriate behavioral health services can reduce criminal justice involvement.

Keywords

Jail diversion Mental illness Forensic assertive community treatment 

References

  1. California Board of Corrections. (2004). Mentally ill offenders crime reduction grant program: Annual report to the legislature. Retrieved February, 2005, from California Board of Corrections web site: http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/cppd/miocrg/2004_annual-report/miocrg_2004_annual_report.doc.
  2. Chandler, D., Spicer, G., Wagner, M., & Hargreaves, W. (1999). Cost effectiveness of a capitated assertive community treatment program. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 22, 327–336.Google Scholar
  3. Council of State Government. (2005). Criminal justice/mental health consensus project. New York, NY: Council of State Governments/Eastern Regional Conference.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cuddeback, G. S., Morrissey, J. P., & Cusack, K. J. (2007). How many forensic assertive community treatment teams do we need? Psychiatric Services, 59(2), 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuddeback, G. S., Morrissey, J. P., Cusack, K. J., & Meyer, P. S. (2009). Challenges to developing forensic assertive community treatment teams. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 12, 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erickson, S. K., Lamberti, J. S., Weisman, R., Crilly, J., Nihalani, N., Stefanovics, E., et al. (2009). Predictors of arrest during forensic assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services, 60, 834–837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Essock, S. M., Frisman, L. K., & Kontos, N. J. (1998). Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment teams. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 179–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamberti, J. S., Weisman, R., & Faden, D. I. (2004). Forensic assertive community treatment: Preventing incarceration of adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 55, 1285–1293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lamberti, J. S., Weisman, R. L., Schwarzkopf, S. B., Price, N., Ashton, R. M., & Trompeter, J. (2001). The mentally ill in jails and prisons: Towards an integrated model of prevention. Psychiatric Quarterly, 72, 63–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Hoch, J. S., DeForge, B., Kernan, E., & Frank, R. (1999). Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 346–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McCoy, M. L., Roberts, D. L., Hanrahan, P., Clay, R., & Luchins, D. J. (2004). Jail linkage assertive community treatment services for individuals with mental illnesses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 243–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Morrissey, J. P., Meyer, P. S., & Cuddeback, G. S. (2007). Extending assertive community treatment to criminal justice settings: Origins, current evidence, and future directions. Community Mental Health Journal, 43, 527–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morse, G. A., Calsyn, R. J., Klinkenberg, W. D., et al. (2006). Treating homeless clients with severe mental illness and substance use disorders: Costs and outcomes. Community Mental Health Journal, 42, 377–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Solomon, P., & Draine, J. (1995). One year outcomes of a randomized trial of case management with seriously mentally ill clients leaving jail. Evaluation Review, 19, 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Steadman, H. J., Cocozza, J. J., & Veysey, B. M. (1999). Comparing outcomes for diverted and nondiverted jail detainees with mental illnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 615–627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Steadman, H. J., & Naples, M. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 163–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60, 761–765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Teague, G. B., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (1998). Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 216–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Teplin, L. (1984). Criminalizing mental disorder: The comparative arrest rate of the mentally ill. American Psychologist, 39, 794–803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Teplin, L.A. (2000). Keeping the peace: Police discretion and mentally ill persons. National Institute of Justice Journal.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen J. Cusack
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph P. Morrissey
    • 2
  • Gary S. Cuddeback
    • 3
  • Annabel Prins
    • 4
    • 5
  • David M. Williams
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.School of Social Work and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Prins, Williams, & Associates LLC.San JoseUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologySan Jose State UniversitySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations