Advertisement

Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 139–147 | Cite as

Psychometric Properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in an Iranian Adult Sample

  • A. R. Usefy
  • Gh. R. GhassemiEmail author
  • N. Sarrafzadegan
  • S. Mallik
  • A. M. Baghaei
  • K. Rabiei
Original Paper

Abstract

To evaluate discriminant validity, reliability, internal consistency, and dimensional structure of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) in a heterogeneous Iranian population. A clustered randomized sample of 2,956 healthy with 2,936 unhealthy rural and urban inhabitants aged 30 and above from two dissimilar Iranian provinces during 2006 completed the Persian version of the WHOQOL-BREF. We performed descriptive and analytical analysis including t-student, correlation matrix, Cronbach’s Alpha, and factor analysis with principal components method and Varimax rotation with SPSS.15. The mean age of the participants was 42.2 ± 12.1 years and the mean years of education was 9.3 ± 3.8. The Iranian version of the WHOQOL-BREF domain scores demonstrated good internal consistency, criterion validity, and discriminant validity. The physical health domain contributed most in overall quality of life, while the environment domain made the least contribution. Factor analysis provided evidence for construct validity for four-factor model of the instrument. The scores of all domains discriminated between healthy persons and the patients. The WHOQOL-BREF has adequate psychometric properties and is, therefore, an adequate measure for assessing quality of life at the domain level in an adult Iranian population.

Keywords

Reliability Construct validity Internal consistency Discriminant validity WHOQOL-BREF 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the office of the deputy of research Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan-Iran. It was conduced by the Medical Education Research Centre in joint venture with Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. We are grateful to Dr Adibi P, the deputy research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan Iran. We are extremely grateful to Professor R. K. Hebsur, ex-head of the Department of Research methodology, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai-India, for his meticulous and careful editing work and useful suggestions.

References

  1. Anastasia, A. (1990). Validity: Basic concepts. In Psychological testing, 6th edn. (pp. 139–157). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Angermeyer, M. C., Holzinger, A., Matschinger, H., & Stengler-Wenzke, K. (2002). Depression and quality of life: Results of a follow-up study. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 48, 189–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barros da Silva Lima, A. F., Fleck, M., Pechansky, F., de Boni, R., & Sukop, P. (2005). Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQoL-BREF) in alcoholic males: A pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 14, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., et al. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787–805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlim, M. T., Pavanello, D. P., Caldieraro, M. A. K., & Flck, M. P. A. (2005). Reliability and validity of the WHOQOL BREF in a sample of Brazilian outpatients with major depression. Quality of Life Research, 14, 561–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonomi, A. E., Patrick, D. L., Bushnell, D. M., & Martin, M. (2000a). Validation of the Unites States’ version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQL) instrument. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonomi, A. E., Patrick, D. L., Bushnell, D. M., & Martin, M. (2000b). Quality of life measurement: Will we ever be satisfied? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 19–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chien, C., Wang, J., Yao, G., Sheu, C., & Hsieh, C. (2007). Development and validation of a WHOQOL-BREF Taiwanese audio player-assited interview version for the elderly who use a spoken dialect. Quality of Life Research, 16, 1375–1381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang, C. T., Hsiung, P. C., Yu, C. F., Shen, M. Y., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Validation of the Wolrd Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection. Quality of Life Research, 11, 753–762.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsiung, P. C., Fang, C. T., Chang, Y. Y., Chen, M. Y., & Wang, J. D. (2005). Comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF and the SF-36 in patients with HIV infection. Quality of Life Research, 14, 141–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., & McEwan, J. (1989). The Nottingham health profile. Users manual. Revised edition.Google Scholar
  12. Izutsu, T., Tsutsumi, A., Islam, M. A., Mstsuo, Y., Yamada, H. S., Kurita, H., et al. (2005). Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1783–1789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jang, Y., Hsieh, C. L., Wang, Y. H., & Wu, Yh. (2004). A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 1890–1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 57, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalfoss, M. H., Low, G., & Molzahn, E. (2008). The suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults. European Journal of Ageing. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0070-z.
  16. Leplege, A., Reveillere, C., Ecosse, E., Caria, A., & Rivier, H. (2000). Psychometirc properties of a new instrument for evaluating quality of life, the WHOQOL-26, in a population of patients with neuromuscular disease. Encephale, 26, 13–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leung, K. F., Wong, W. W., Tay, M. S. M., Chu, M. M. L., & Ng, S. S. W. (2005). Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1413–1419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lima, A. F., Fleck, M., Pechansky, F., Boni, R., & Sukop, P. (2005). Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQoL-BREF) in alcoholic males: A pilot study. Quality of Life Research, 14, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Min, S. K., Kim, Ki., Lee, C. I., Gung, Y. C., Suh, S. Y., & Kim, D. K. (2002). Development of the Korean version of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF. Quality of Life Research, 11, 593–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nedjat, S., Montazeri, A., Holakouie, K., Mohammad, K., & Majdzadeh, R. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Iranian interview-administered version of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF): A population-based study. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Noerholam, V., Groenvold, M., Watt, T., Bjorner, J. B., Rasmussen, N. A., & Bech, P. (2004). Quality of life in the Danish general population-normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rasch and item response theory models. Quality of Life Research, 13, 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Caroll, R. E., Smith, K., Couston, M., Cossar, J. A., & Hayes, P. C. (2000). A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOWOL-Bref in detecting change in quality of life flowing liver transplantation. Quality of Life Research, 9, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sarrafzadegan, N., Baghaiei, A. M., Sadri, Gh., et al. (2006). Isfahan healthy heart programme: A comprehensive integrated community-based programme for non-communicable disease prevention. Prevention and control Journal, 2(2), 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarrafzadegan, N., Sadri, Gh., Malek Afzali, H., et al. (2003). Isfahan healthy heart programme: A comprehensive integrated community-based programme for cardiovascular disease prevention and control Design, method, and initial experience. Acta Cardiologica, 58(4), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skvington, S. M., Loftfy, M., & O’Connell, Ka. (2004). The World Health organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychiatric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research 13:299–311, 9–3110.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, W. J., Myers, J., Simpson, R. T., McPherson, K. M., & Weatherall, M. (2004). Qulaity of life of people with rheumatoid arthritis as measured by the world health organization quality of life instrument, short form (WHOQOL-BREF): Score distributions and psychometric properties. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 51, 350–357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tazaki, M., Nakane, Y., Endo, T., Kakikawa, F., Kano, K., Hiroomi, K., et al. (1998). Results of qualitative and field study using the WHOQOL instrument for cancer patients. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 134–141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Trompenaars, F. J., Masthoff, E. D., Van Heck, G. L., Hodiamont, P. P., & De Vries, J. (2005). Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. Quality of Life Research, 14, 151–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendation for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gadek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. MA, USA: New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
  31. WHOQOL Group. (1993). Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research, 2, 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WHOQOL Group. (1998a). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1569–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. WHOQOL Group. (1998b). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yao, G., & Wu, C. (2005). Factorial invariance of the WHOQOL-BREF among diseases groups. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1881–1888.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao, G., Wu, C., & Yang, C. (2008). Examining the content validity of the WHOQOL-BREF from respondents’ perspective by quantitative methods. Social Science and Medicine, 85, 483–498.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Usefy
    • 1
  • Gh. R. Ghassemi
    • 2
    Email author
  • N. Sarrafzadegan
    • 3
  • S. Mallik
    • 4
  • A. M. Baghaei
    • 5
  • K. Rabiei
    • 6
  1. 1.Medical Education Research Centre (MERC)Isfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, School of MedicineIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  3. 3.Isfahan Cardiovascular Research CentreIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  4. 4.Zenderood Clinic of Social WorkIsfahanIran
  5. 5.Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, WHO Collaborating CentreIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  6. 6.Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Centre, WHO Collaborating CentreIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations