Advertisement

Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 337–341 | Cite as

Feasibility and Usefulness of Training Assertive Community Treatment Team in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • Narsimha R. Pinninti
  • Jillian Fisher
  • Kelly Thompson
  • Robert Steer
Original Paper

Abstract

Individuals with Serious mental illness require psychosocial treatments as adjunct to pharmacotherapy to promote recovery. An ACT team was trained in CBT interventions and charts were reviewed to identify sessions where CBT was utilized. Subjects who received at least 3 sessions of CBT went from 10% before training to 44% after training and 54% in the follow up period. All team members including bachelor’s level staff provided CBT interventions. Results show that ACT Team members including those at bachelor’s level can be trained in CBT and they utilize these interventions after training is completed.

Keywords

Assertive community team Cognitive behavior therapy Serious mental illness Case management Psychosocial treatments Evidence based practice and outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank SBCS Inc for access to data, Crystal Scaffidi for helping in data collection and Faith Dickerson for her review of the manuscript and critical comments.

References

  1. Barkham, M., Shapiro, D. A., et al. (1999). Psychotherapy in two-plus-one sessions: Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy for subsyndromal depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 210–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackburn, I. M., James, I. A., et al. (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTS-R): Psychometric properties. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 29, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, R. E., & Samnaliev, M. (2005). Psychosocial treatment in the 21st century. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28(5), 532–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Corrigan, P. W., Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Solomon, P. (2008). Principles and practice of psychiatric rehabilitation. The Guildford Press: New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, R. (2002). Living with schizophrenia and thriving in remission: 10 years of stress and crises. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 2, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dilk, M. N., & Bond, G. R. (1996). Meta-analytic evaluation of skills training research for individuals with severe mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1337–1346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Drake, R. E., Merrens, M. R., & Lynde, D. W. (2005). Evidenced based mental health practice: A textbook. Norton and Company: New York.Google Scholar
  8. Lehman, A. F., & Steinwachs, D. M. (2003). Evidence-based psychosocial treatment practices in schizophrenia: Lessons from the patient outcomes research team (PORT) project. The journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 31(1), 141–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. NACM (1997). Technical assistance collaborative (1996): Managed care: Case management, care management roles and responsibilities. Boston, MA, p. 87.Google Scholar
  10. NICE (2008). Schizophrenia: Core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in adults in primary and secondary care.Google Scholar
  11. (NFCMH), P. s. N. f. c. o. m. h. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming the mental health care in America. Rockville,MD. DHSS Publication No. SMA-03-3832.Google Scholar
  12. Patterson, T. L., & Leeuwenkamp, O. R. (2008). Adjunctive psychosocial therapies for the treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 100(1–3), 108–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pilling, S., Bebbington, P., Kuipers, E., Garety, P., Geddes, J., Martindale, B., et al. (2002). Psychological treatments in schizophrenia: I. Meta-analysis of family intervention and cognitive behaviour therapy. Psychological Medicine, 32, 763–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosen, A., Mueser, K. T., et al. (2007). Assertive community treatment-Issues from scientific and clinical literature with implications for practice. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 44(6), 813–826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Salyers, M. P., & Tsemberis, S. (2007). ACT and recovery: Integrating evidence-based practice and recovery orientation on assertive community treatment teams. Community Mental Health Journal, 43(6), 619–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Turkington, D., Kingdon, D., et al. (2002). Effectiveness of a brief cognitive-behavioural therapy intervention in the treatment of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 523–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. WHO. (1999). World Health Organization. World health report 1999: making a difference. From Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/1999/en/index.html.
  18. Wykes, T., Steel, C., et al. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy for schizophrenia: Effect sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigor. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(3), 523–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narsimha R. Pinninti
    • 1
  • Jillian Fisher
    • 2
  • Kelly Thompson
    • 3
  • Robert Steer
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Osteopathic MedicineUMDNJ-SOMCherry HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Social WorkRutgers UniversityTrentonUSA
  3. 3.ACT Team, SBCS Inc.Cherry HillUSA
  4. 4.SOM-UMDNJCherry HillUSA

Personalised recommendations