Advertisement

A numerical study of multi-parameter full waveform inversion with iterative regularization using multi-frequency vibroseis data

  • Jia ShiEmail author
  • Elena Beretta
  • Maarten V. de Hoop
  • Elisa Francini
  • Sergio Vessella
Original Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

We study the inverse boundary value problem for time-harmonic elastic waves, for the recovery of P- and S-wave speeds from vibroseis data or the Neumann-to-Dirichlet map. Our study is based on our recent result pertaining to the uniqueness and a conditional Lipschitz stability estimate for parametrizations on unstructured tetrahedral meshes of this inverse boundary value problem. With the conditional Lipschitz stability estimate, we design a procedure for full waveform inversion (FWI) with iterative regularization. The iterative regularization is implemented by projecting gradients, after scaling, onto subspaces associated with the mentioned parametrizations yielding Lipschitz stability. The procedure is illustrated in computational experiments using the continuous Galerkin finite element method of recovering the rough shapes and wave speeds of geological bodies from simple starting models, near and far from the boundary, that is, the free surface.

Keywords

Full waveform inversion Finite element method Stability and convergence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

J.S. would like to thank Jean Virieux, Peter Caday, Ruichao Ye, and Florian Faucher for useful discussions. The authors would also like to thank two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Funding information

MVdH and JS were financially supported by the Simons Foundation under the MATH + X program, the National Science Foundation under grant DMS-1815143, and by the members of the Geo-Mathematical Group at Rice University.

References

  1. 1.
    Akcelik, V., Biros, G., Ghattas, O.: Parallel multiscale Gauss-Newton-Krylov methods for inverse wave propagation. In: ACM/IEEE 2002 Conference Supercomputing, pp. 41:1–41:15. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avena, L., Castell, F, Gaudillière, A., Mélot, C.: Intertwining wavelets or multiresolution analysis on graphs through random forests. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baeten, G.J.M.: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of the Vibroseis Method. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berenger, J.-P.: A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Comput. Phys. 114 (2), 185–200 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beretta, E., de Hoop, M.V., Faucher, F., Scherzer, O.: Inverse boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation: quantitative conditional Lipschitz stability estimates. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 48(6), 3962–3983 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beretta, E., de Hoop, M.V., Francini, E., Vessella, S., Zhai, J.: Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability of an inverse boundary value problem for time-harmonic elastic waves. Inverse Probl. 33(3), 035013 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boonyasiriwat, C., Valasek, P., Routh, P., Cao, W., Schuster, G.T., Macy, B.: An efficient multiscale method for time-domain waveform tomography. Geophysics 74(6), WCC59–WCC68 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borisov, D., Smith, J., Tromp, J., Miller, R., Peterie, S., Cudney, H., Sloan, S., Moran, M.: Multi-component 3D elastic full waveform inversion using surface and body waves for detecting near surface anomalies. In: 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borzì, A, Schulz, V.: Computational Optimization of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. SIAM (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brossier, R., Operto, S., Virieux, J.: Seismic imaging of complex onshore structures by 2D elastic frequency-domain full-waveform inversion. Geophysics 74(6), WCC105–WCC118 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bunks, C., Saleck, F.M., Zaleski, S., Chavent, G.: Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics 60, 1457–1473 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Capdeville, Y., Marigo, J.-J.: Second order homogenization of the elastic wave equation for non-periodic layered media. Geophys. J. Int. 170(2), 823–838 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chavent, G.: Identification of functional parameters in partial differential equations. Joint Autom. Control Conf. 12, 155–156 (1974)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chew, W.C., Weedon, W.H.: A 3D perfectly matched medium from modified Maxwell’s equations with stretched coordinates. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 7(13), 599–604 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi, Y., Min, D.-J., Shin, C.: Frequency-domain elastic full waveform inversion using the new pseudo-Hessian matrix: experience of elastic Marmousi-2 synthetic data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 2402–2415 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciarlet, P.G., Miara, B., Thomas, J.-M.: Introduction to Numerical Linear Algebra and Optimisation. Cambridge University Press (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Datchev, K., de Hoop, M.V.: Iterative reconstruction of the wave speed for the wave equation with bounded frequency boundary data. Inverse Probl. 32(2), 025008 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Hoop, M.V., Qiu, L., Scherzer, O.: An analysis of a multi-level projected steepest descent iteration for nonlinear inverse problems in Banach spaces subject to stability constraints. Numer. Math. 129(1), 127–148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esser, E., Guasch, L., van Leeuwen, T., Aravkin, A.Y., Herrmann, F.J.: Total variation regularization strategies in full-waveform inversion. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 11(1), 376–406 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fabri, A., Pion, S.: CGAL: The computational geometry algorithms library. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 538–539. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fang, Q., Boas, D.A.: Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2009. ISBI’09, pp. 1142–1145. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fehler, M., Keliher, P.J.: SEAM Phase 1: Challenges of subsalt imaging in tertiary basins, with emphasis on deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fichtner, A., Trampert, J.: Hessian kernels of seismic data functionals based upon adjoint techniques. Geophys. J. Int. 185(2), 775–798 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fichtner, A., Trampert, J., Cupillard, P., Saygin, E., Taymaz, T., Capdeville, Y., Villaseñor, A.: Multiscale full waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 194(1), 534–556 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gauthier, O., Vieurx, J., Tarantola, A.: Two-dimensional nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms: Numerical results. Geophysics 51, 1387–1403 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hughes, T.J.: The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Courier Corporation (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kormann, J., Rodríguez, J.E., Ferrer, M., Farrés, A., Gutiérrez, N., de la Puente, J., Hanzich, M., Cela, J.M.: Acceleration strategies for elastic full waveform inversion workflows in 2D and 3D. Comput. Geosci. 21(1), 31–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kothari, K., Gupta, S, de Hoop, M.V., Dokmanic, I.: Random mesh projectors for inverse problems. ICLR (2019)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lailly, P.: The Seismic Inverse Problem as a Sequence of Before Stack Migrations. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1983)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, D., Gurnis, M., Stadler, G.: Towards adjoint-based inversion of time-dependent mantle convection with nonlinear viscosity. Geophys. J. Int. 209(1), 86–105 (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lions, J.L., Mitter, S.K.: Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations, vol. 1200. Springer, Berlin (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu, X., Xi, Y., Saad, Y., de Hoop, M.V.: Solving the 3D High-Frequency Helmholtz Equation Using Contour Integration and Polynomial Preconditioning. arXiv:1811.12378 (2018)
  33. 33.
    Liu, X., Xia, J., de Hoop, M.V.: Parallel randomized and matrix-free direct solvers for large structured dense linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38(5), S508–S538 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loris, I., Nolet, G., Daubechies, I., Dahlen, F.: Tomographic inversion using l 1-norm regularization of wavelet coefficients. Geophys. J. Int. 170(1), 359–370 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marfurt, K.J.: Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations. Geophysics 49(5), 533–549 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Métivier, L., Brossier, R., Virieux, J., Operto, S.: Full waveform inversion and the truncated Newton method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35(2), B401–B437 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mora, P.: Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data. Geophysics 52(9), 1211–1228 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nuber, A., Manukyan, E., Maurer, H.: Ground topography effects on near-surface elastic full waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 207(1), 67–71 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pan, G., Liang, L., Habashy, T.M.: A numerical study of 3D frequency-domain elastic full-waveform inversion. Geophysics 84(1), R113–R122 (2018)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Plessix, R., Milcik, P., Rynja, H., Stopin, A., Matson, K., Abri, S.: Multiparameter full-waveform inversion: marine and land examples. Lead. Edge 32(9), 1030–1038 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Plessix, R.-E.: A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophys. J. Int. 167(2), 495–503 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pratt, R.G.: Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography. Part 2: Elastic wave-equation method. Geophys. Prospect. 38(3), 311–329 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pratt, R.G., Shin, C., Hicks, G.J.: Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 133, 341–362 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pratt, R.G., Worthington, M.H.: Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography. Part 1: Acoustic wave-equation method. Geophys. Prospect. 38, 287–310 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Prieux, V., Brossier, R., Operto, S., Virieux, J.: Multiparameter full waveform inversion of multicomponent OBC data from valhall. Part 2: Imaging compressional and shearwave velocities. Geophys. J. Int. 194, 3 (2013)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Raknes, E.B., Weibull, W., Arntsen, B.: Seismic imaging of the carbon dioxide gas cloud at Sleipner using 3D elastic time-lapse full waveform inversion. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 42, 26–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Regone, C., Stefani, J., Wang, P., Gerea, C., Gonzalez, G., Oristaglio, M.: Geologic model building in SEAM Phase II—Land seismic challenges. Lead. Edge 36(9), 738–749 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shen, X., Ahmed, I., Brenders, A., Dellinger, J., Etgen, J., Michell, S.: Full-waveform inversion: the next leap forward in subsalt imaging. Leading Edge 37(1), 67b1–67b6 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shi, J., de Hoop, M., Faucher, F., Calandra, H.: Elastic full-waveform inversion with surface and body waves. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016, pp. 1120–1124. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (2016)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shi, J., Li, R., Xi, Y., Saad, Y., de Hoop, M.V.: Computing planetary interior normal modes with a highly parallel polynomial filtering eigensolver. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis, SC’18, Dallas, TX, November 11–16, 2018, pp. 71:1–71:13. ACM/IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shi, J., Ye, R., de Hoop, M.: Full-waveform inversion with 3D-shape optimization on unstructured meshes. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, pp. 1528–1532. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (2017)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shin, J., Kim, Y., Shin, C., Calandra, H.: Laplace-domain full waveform inversion using irregular finite elements for complex foothill environments. J. Appl. Geophys. 96, 67–76 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Si, H.: Tetgen: A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and Three-Dimensional Delaunay Triangulator. Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastic, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sirgue, L., Pratt, R.G.: Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies. Geophysics 69, 231–248 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stopin, A., Plessix, R.-É., Al Abri, S.: Multiparameter waveform inversion of a large wide-azimuth low-frequency land data set in Oman. Geophysics 79(3), WA69–WA77 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Symes, W.W.: Approximate linearized inversion by optimal scaling of prestack depth migration. Geophysics 73(2), R23–R35 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tarantola, A.: Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 49, 1259–1266 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tarantola, A.: Inversion of travel times and seismic waveforms. In: Seismic Tomography, pp. 135–157. Springer (1987)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tarantola, A.: Theoretical background for the inversion of seismic waveforms including elasticity and attenuation. Pure Appl. Geophys. 128(1-2), 365–399 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tromp, J., Tape, C., Liu, Q.: Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana-doughnut kernels. Geophys. J. Int. 160, 195–216 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Xin, Z., Xia, J., de Hoop, M.V., Cauley, S., Balakrishnan, V.: A distributed-memory randomized structured multifrontal method for sparse direct solutions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 39(4), C292–C318 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ye, R., de Hoop, M.V., Petrovitch, C.L., Pyrak-Nolte, L.J., Wilcox, L.C.: A discontinuous Galerkin method with a modified penalty flux for the propagation and scattering of acousto-elastic waves. Geophys. J. Int. 205(2), 1267–1289 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yuan, Y.O., Simons, F.J., Bozdağ, E.: Multiscale adjoint waveform tomography for surface and body waves. Geophysics 80(5), R281–R302 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zheng, Y., Huang, X.: Anisotropic perfectly matched layers for elastic waves in cartesian and curvilinear coordinates. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Earth Resources Laboratory (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jia Shi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elena Beretta
    • 2
  • Maarten V. de Hoop
    • 3
  • Elisa Francini
    • 4
  • Sergio Vessella
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary SciencesRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Matematica “F. Brioschi”Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Simons Chair in Computational and Applied Mathematics and Earth ScienceRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica “U. Dini”Universita di FirenzeMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations