Advertisement

Computational Geosciences

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1123–1137 | Cite as

Particle tracking approach for transport in three-dimensional discrete fracture networks

Particle tracking in 3-D DFNs
  • Nataliia Makedonska
  • Scott L. Painter
  • Quan M. Bui
  • Carl W. Gable
  • Satish Karra
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The discrete fracture network (DFN) model is a method to mimic discrete pathways for fluid flow through a fractured low-permeable rock mass, and may be combined with particle tracking simulations to address solute transport. However, experience has shown that it is challenging to obtain accurate transport results in three-dimensional DFNs because of the high computational burden and difficulty in constructing a high-quality unstructured computational mesh on simulated fractures. We present a new particle tracking capability, which is adapted to control volume (Voronoi polygons) flow solutions on unstructured grids (Delaunay triangulations) on three-dimensional DFNs. The locally mass-conserving finite-volume approach eliminates mass balance-related problems during particle tracking. The scalar fluxes calculated for each control volume face by the flow solver are used to reconstruct a Darcy velocity at each control volume centroid. The groundwater velocities can then be continuously interpolated to any point in the domain of interest. The control volumes at fracture intersections are split into four pieces, and the velocity is reconstructed independently on each piece, which results in multiple groundwater velocities at the intersection, one for each fracture on each side of the intersection line. This technique enables detailed particle transport representation through a complex DFN structure. Verified for small DFNs, the new simulation capability enables numerical experiments on advective transport in large DFNs to be performed. We demonstrate this particle transport approach on a DFN model using parameters similar to those of crystalline rock at a proposed geologic repository for spent nuclear fuel in Forsmark, Sweden.

Keywords

Discrete fracture network Subsurface flow Numerical modeling Control volume method Advective transport Particle tracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler, P.M., Thovert. J.-F., Mourzenko, V.V.: Fractured porous media. Oxford University Press (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AMEC: ConnectFlow technical summary, release 10.4. AMEC report AMEC/ENV/CONNECTFLOW/15 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ataie-Ashtiani, B., Lockington, D.A., Volker, R.E.: Numerical correction for finite-difference solution of the advection—dispersion equation with reaction. J. Contam. Hydrol. 23(1), 149–156 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bear, J.: Dynamics of fluids in porous media, p 702. American Elsevier Publishing company Inc. (1972)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkowitz, B., Scher, H.: Anomalous transport in random fracture networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(20), 4038 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cacas, M.C., Ledoux, E, de Marsily, G., Tillie, B., Barbreau, A., Durand, E., Feuga, B., Peaudecerf, P.: Modeling fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: calibration and validation 1, The flow model. Water Resour. Res. 26(3), 479–489 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coxeter, H.S.M.: Introduction to geometry. John Wiley and Sons, 216–221 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cvetkovic, V., Frampton, A.: Solute transport and retention in three-dimensional fracture networks. Water Resour. Res. 48(2), W02509 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cvetkovic, V., Painter, S.L., Outters, N., Selroos, J.-O.: Stochastic simulation of radionuclide migration in discretely fractured rock near the Äspö hard rock laboratory. Water Resour. Res. 40(2), W02404 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Dreuzy, J.-R., Meheust, Y., Pichot, G.: Influence of fracture scale heterogeneity on the flow properties of three-dimensional discrete fracture networks (DFN). JGR 117, B1120 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dershowitz, W.S., Lee, G., Geier, J., Foxford, T., LaPointe, P., Thomas, A.: FracMan Version 2.6. Interactive discrete feature data analysis, geometric modeling, and exploration simulation, user documentation. Report 923–1089, Golder Associates Inc. Seattle, Washington (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dershowitz, W.S., Fidelibus, C.: Derivation of equivalent pipe network analogues for three-dimensional discrete fracture networks by the boundary element method. Water Resour. Res. 35(9), 2685–2691 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eikimo, B., Lie, K.-A., Eigestad, G.T., Dahle, H.K.: Discontinuous Galerkin methods for advective transport in single-continuum models of fractured media. Adv. Water Resour. 32(4), 493–506 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elsworth, D.: A hybrid boundary element-finite element analysis procedure for fluid flow simulation in fractured rock masses. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Method Geomech. 10, 569–584 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Erhel, J, de Dreuzy, J.-R., Poirriez, B.: Flow simulation in three-dimensional discrete fracture networks. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 31(4), 2688–2705 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Frampton, A., Cvetkovic, V.: Numerical and analytical modeling of advective travel times in realistic three-dimensional fracture networks. Water Resour. Res. 47(2), W02506 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geier, J.: Investigation of discrete-fracture network conceptual model uncertainty at Forsmark. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, Stockholm (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hartley, L., Cox, I., Holton, D., Hunter, F., Joyce, S., Gylling, B., Lindgren, M.: Groundwater flow and radionuclide transport modeling using connectflow in support of the SR Can assessment. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hartley, L., Joyce, S.: Approaches and algorithms for groundwater flow modeling in support of site investigations and safety assessment of the Forsmark site, Sweden. J. Hydrol. 500, 200–216 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hogg, R.V., Craig, A.T.: Introduction to mathematical statistics. Macmillan, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hyman, J.D., Gable, C.W., Painter, S.L., Makedonska, N.: Conforming Delaunay triangulation of stochastically generated three dimensional discrete fracture networks : a feature rejection algorithm for meshing strategy. SIAM Sci. Comp. 36(4), A1871–A1894 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karra, S., Makedonska, N., Viswanathan, H.S., Painter, S.L., Hyman, J.D.: Effect of advective flow in fractures and matrix diffusion on natural gas production.Water Resour. Res., under review (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lichtner, P.C., Hammond, G.E., Lu, C., Karra, S., Bisht, G., Mills, R.T., Kumar, J., Andre, B.: PFLOTRAN: a massively parallel flow and reactive transport model for surface and subsurface processes, Los Alamos National Laboratory Technical Report No: LA-UR-15-20403, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Long, J.C.S., Remer, J.S., Wilson, C.R., Witherspoon, P.A.: Porous media equivalents for networks of discontinuous fractures. Water Resour. Res. 18(3), 645–658 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martinez, M.J.: Comparison of Galerkin and control volume finite element for advection–diffusion problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 50(3), 347–376 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maryska, J., Severyn, O., Vohralik, M.: Numerical simulation of fracture flow with a mixed-hybrid FEM stochastic discrete fracture network model. Comput. Geosci. 8, 217–234 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murphy, M., Gable, C.W.: Strategies for nonobtuse boundary Delaunay triangulations 7th International Meshing Roundtable Proceedings, pp 309–320. Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neuman, S.P.: Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks. Hydrogeol. J. 13, 124–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nick, H.M., Matthäi, S.K.: Comparison of three FE-FV numerical schemes for single-and two-phase flow simulation of fractured porous media. Transp. Porous Med. 90(2), 421–444 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Outters, N., Shuttle, D.: Sensitivity analysis of discrete fracture network model for performance assessment of Aberg. R 00-48. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Painter, S.L., Cvetkovic, V., Selroos, J.-O.: Transport and retention in fractured rock: consequences of a power-law distribution for fracture length. Phys. Rev. E 57(6), 6917 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Painter, S.L., Cvetkovic, V., Selroos, J.-O.: Power-law velocity distributions in fracture networks: numerical evidence and implications for tracer transport. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1676 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Painter, S.L., Cvetkovic, V., Mancillas, J., Pensado, O.: Time domain particle tracking methods for simulating transport with retention and first-order transformation. Water Resour. Res. 44(1), W01406 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Painter, S.L.: User’s Manual for Walkabout Version 1.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory Technical Report No: LA-UR-11-01952, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Painter, S.L., Gable, C.W., Kelkar, S.: Pathline tracing on fully unstructured control-volume grids. Comput. Geosci. 16(4), 1125–1134 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poteri, A.: Retention properties of flow paths in fractured rock. Hydrogeol. J. 15, 1081–1092 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Poteri, A., Nordman, H., Pulkkanen, V.-E., Smith, P.: Radionuclide transport in the repository near-field and far-field. Posiva Report 2014-02, Posiva Oy, Helsinki, Finland (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Robinson, P.C.: Connectivity, flow and transport in network of fractured media. D.Phil Thesis. Oxford University (1984)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Selroos, J., Walker, D., Storm, A., Gylling, B., Follin, S.: Comparison of alternative modeling approaches for groundwater flow in fractured rock. J. Hydrol. 257, 174–188 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Selroos, J.O., Painter, S.L.: Effect of transport-pathway simplifications on projected releases of radionuclides from a nuclear waste repository (Sweden). Hydrogeol. J. 20(8), 1467–1481 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Selroos, J.O., Follin, S.: Overview of hydrogeological site-descriptive modeling conducted for the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository site at Forsmark, Sweden. Hydrogeol. J. 22(2), 295–298 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    SKB: Radionuclide transport report for the safety assessment SR-Site. SKB TR-10-50, volumes I–III. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    SKB: Long-term safety for the final repository for spent nuclear fuel at Forsmark, SKB TR-11-01. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Van Genuchten, M.T.H., Gray, W.G.: Analysis of some dispersion corrected numerical schemes for solution of the transport equation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 12(3), 387–404 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Versteeg, H.K., Malalasekera, W.: An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Pearson Education (2007)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wahlgren, C.H., Curtis, P., Hermanson, J., Forssberg, O., Oehman, J., Fox, A., Juhlin, C.: Geology laxemar. Site descriptive modeling SDM-Site Laxemar. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (2008)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zidane, A., Firoozabadi, A.: An efficient numerical model for multicomponent compressible flow in fractured porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 74, 127–147 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zyvoloski, G.A.: FEHM: A control volume finite element code for simulating subsurface multi-phase multi-fluid heat and mass transfer. Los Alamos National Laboratory Technical Report No: LA-UR-07-3359, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA) 2015 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nataliia Makedonska
    • 1
  • Scott L. Painter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Quan M. Bui
    • 1
    • 3
  • Carl W. Gable
    • 1
  • Satish Karra
    • 1
  1. 1.Computational Earth Science GroupLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Science DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  3. 3.Applied Mathematics, Statistics, and Scientific Computation ProgramUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations