Advertisement

Computational Geosciences

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 833–850 | Cite as

Multilevel Monte Carlo methods using ensemble level mixed MsFEM for two-phase flow and transport simulations

  • Y. Efendiev
  • O. Iliev
  • C. KronsbeinEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we propose multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) methods that use ensemble level mixed multiscale methods in the simulations of multiphase flow and transport. The contribution of this paper is twofold: (1) a design of ensemble level mixed multiscale finite element methods and (2) a novel use of mixed multiscale finite element methods within multilevel Monte Carlo techniques to speed up the computations. The main idea of ensemble level multiscale methods is to construct local multiscale basis functions that can be used for any member of the ensemble. In this paper, we consider two ensemble level mixed multiscale finite element methods: (1) the no-local-solve-online ensemble level method (NLSO); and (2) the local-solve-online ensemble level method (LSO). The first approach was proposed in Aarnes and Efendiev (SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30(5):2319-2339, 2008) while the second approach is new. Both mixed multiscale methods use a number of snapshots of the permeability media in generating multiscale basis functions. As a result, in the off-line stage, we construct multiple basis functions for each coarse region where basis functions correspond to different realizations. In the no-local-solve-online ensemble level method, one uses the whole set of precomputed basis functions to approximate the solution for an arbitrary realization. In the local-solve-online ensemble level method, one uses the precomputed functions to construct a multiscale basis for a particular realization. With this basis, the solution corresponding to this particular realization is approximated in LSO mixed multiscale finite element method (MsFEM). In both approaches, the accuracy of the method is related to the number of snapshots computed based on different realizations that one uses to precompute a multiscale basis. In this paper, ensemble level multiscale methods are used in multilevel Monte Carlo methods (Giles 2008a, Oper.Res. 56(3):607-617, b). In multilevel Monte Carlo methods, more accurate (and expensive) forward simulations are run with fewer samples, while less accurate (and inexpensive) forward simulations are run with a larger number of samples. Selecting the number of expensive and inexpensive simulations based on the number of coarse degrees of freedom, one can show that MLMC methods can provide better accuracy at the same cost as Monte Carlo (MC) methods. The main objective of the paper is twofold. First, we would like to compare NLSO and LSO mixed MsFEMs. Further, we use both approaches in the context of MLMC to speedup MC calculations.

Keywords

Two-phase flow Porous media Multiscale methods Multilevel Monte Carlo Stochastic partial differential equations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aarnes, J.E.: On the use of a mixed multiscale finite element method for greater flexibility and increased speed or improved accuracy in reservoir simulation. SIAM MMS 2, 421–439 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aarnes, J.E., Efendiev, Y.: Mixed multiscale finite element methods for stochastic porous media flows. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30(5), 2319–2339 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aarnes, J.E., Efendiev, Y., Jiang, L.: Analysis of multiscale finite element methods using global information for two-phase flow simulations. SIAM MMS 7(2), 655–676 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aarnes, J.E., Gimse, T., Lie, K.-A.: An introduction to the numerics of flow in porous media using matlab. In: Geometric Modelling, Numerical Simulation, and Optimization, pp. 265–306 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aarnes, J.E., Krogstad, S., Lie, K.-A.: A hierarchical multiscale method for two-phase flow based upon mixed finite elements and nonuniform coarse grids. Multiscale Model. Simul. 5(2), 337–363 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barth, A., Schwab, C., Zollinger, N.: Multi-level Monte Carlo finite element method for elliptic PDEs with stochastic coefficients. Numer. Math. 199(1), 123–161 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, Y., Durlofsky, L.: Ensemble level upscaling for efficient estimation of fine-scale production statistics. SPE J. 13, 400–411 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, Y., Durlofsky, L., Gerritsen, M., Wen, X.: A coupled local-global upscaling approach for simulating flow in highly heterogeneous formations. Adv. Water Resour. 26, 1041–1060 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, Z., Hou, T.Y.: A mixed multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems with oscillating coefficients. Math. Comput. 72(242), 541–576 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cliffe, K.A., Giles, M., Scheichl, R., Teckentrup, A.: Multilevel Monte Carlo methods and applications to elliptic PDEs with random coefficients. Comput. Vis. Sci. 14(3), 3–15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Efendiev, Y., Galvis, J., Thomines, F.: A systematic coarse-scale model reduction technique for parameter-dependent flows in highly heterogeneous media and its applications. Multiscale Model. Simul. (submitted 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Efendiev, Y., Hou, T.Y.: Multiscale finite element methods. Theory and applications. Springer, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giles, M.: Improved multilevel Monte Carlo convergence using the Milstein scheme. In: Keller, A., et al.(eds.)Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006, pp 343–358. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giles, M.: Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation. Oper. Res. 56(3), 607–617 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heinrich, S.: Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. In: Margenov, S., Wasniewski, J., Yalamov, P. (eds.) Large-scale Scientific Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2179, pp 58–67. Springer, Berlin (2001) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hou, T.Y., Wu, X.H.: A multiscale finite element method for elliptic problems in composite materials and porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 134(1), 169–189 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kronsbein, C.: On selected efficient numerical methods for multiscale problems with stochastic coefficients. PhD thesis, TU Kaiserslautern (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lie, K.-A., Krogstad, S., Ligaarden, I., Natvig, J., Nilsen, H., Skaflestad, B.: Open-source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids. Comput. Geosci. 16(2), 297–322 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loeve, M.: Probability Theory II, XVI, 4th edn, p. 413. Graduate texts in mathematics, 46. Springer, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Owhadi, H., Zhang, L.: Metric-based upscaling. Commun. Pur. Appl. Math. 60(5), 675–723 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patera, A.T., Rozza, G.: Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for parameterized partial differential equations, vol. 1.0, to appear in (tentative rubric). MIT Pappalardo Graduate Monographs in Mechanical Engineering (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rovas, D.V., Machiels, L., Maday, Y.: Reduced-basis output bound methods for parabolic problems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 26(3), 423–445 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Fraunhofer ITWM & University of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  3. 3.SRI Center on Numerical Porous MediaKAUSTThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations