Advertisement

Computational Geosciences

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 21–38 | Cite as

Three-dimensional numerical simulations of the Downie Slide to test the influence of shear surface geometry and heterogeneous shear zone stiffness

  • Katherine S. Kalenchuk
  • Mark S. Diederichs
  • D. Jean Hutchinson
Original Paper

Abstract

Massive slow-moving landslides often exhibit deformation patterns which vary spatially across the landslide mass and temporally with changing boundary conditions. Understanding the parameters controlling this behaviour, such as heterogeneous material properties, complex landslide geometry and the distribution of groundwater, is fundamental when making informed design and hazard management decisions. This paper demonstrates that significant improvements to the geomechanical analysis of massive landslides can be achieved through rigorous, three-dimensional numerical modelling. Simulations of the Downie Slide incorporate complex shear zone geometries, multiple water tables and spatial variation of shear zone stiffness parameters to adequately reproduce real slope behaviour observed through an ongoing site monitoring program. These three-dimensional models are not hindered by shortfalls typically associated with two-dimensional analysis, for example the ability to accommodate lateral migration of material, and they out-perform more simplified three-dimensional models where bowl-shaped shear geometries are incapable of reasonably reproducing observed deformation patterns.

Keywords

Landslide mechanisms Monitoring Three-dimensional numerical modelling Downie Slide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stead, D., Eberhardt, E., Coggan, J.S.: Developments in the characterization of complex rock slope deformation and failure using numerical modelling techniques. Eng. Geol. 83, 217–235 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eberhardt, E., Stead, D., Coggan, J., Willenberg, H.: An integrated numerical analysis approach applied to the Randa rockslide. In: Rybár, J., Stemberk, J., Wagner, P., Balkema, A.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Landslides, pp. 355–362. Lisse, Prague (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stead, D., Coggan, J.S.: Numerical modelling of rock slopes using a total slope failure approach. In: Evans, S.G. et al. (eds.) Landslides from Massive Rock Slope Failure, pp. 129–138. Springer, Netherlands (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalenchuk, K.S., Hutchinson, D.J., Diederichs, M.S.: Morphological and geomechanical analysis of the Downie Slide using 3-dimensional numerical models: testing the influence of internal shears and interaction between landslide regions on simulated slope behaviour. Submitted to Landslides in August: 32 manuscript pages (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalenchuk, K.S.: Multi-dimensional analysis of large, complex slope instability. Ph.D.(Eng.) thesis, Dept. Geol. Sci Geol. Eng., Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cruden, A.M., Varnes, D.J.: Landslide types and processes. In: Turner, A.K., Schuster, R.L. (eds.) Landslides Investigation and Mitigation Special Report 247, pp. 36–75. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enegren, E.G., Imrie, A.S.: Ongoing requirements for monitoring and maintaining a large remediate rockslide. In: Proc 7th International Symposium on Landslides, pp. 1677–1682. Balkema, Trondheim, Norway (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piteau, D.R, Mylrea, F.H., Blown, I.G.: Chapter 10: Downie Slide, Columbia River, British Columbia, Canada. In: Voight, B. (ed) Rockslides and Avalanches, pp. 365–392. Elsevier, New York, USA (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, R.L., Psutka, J.F.: Structural and stratigraphic setting of the Downie Slide, Columbia River valley, British Columbia. Can. J. Earth Sci. 17, 698–709 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Read, P.B., Brown, R.L.: Columbia River fault zone: southeastern margin of the shuswap and Monashee complexes, southern British Columbia. Can. J. Earth Sci. 18, 1127–1145 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scammell, R.J., Brown R.L.: Cover gneisses of the Monashee Terrane: a record of synsedimentary rifting in the North American Cordillera. Can. J. Earth Sci. 27, 712–726 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Armstrong, R.L., Parrish, R.R., Heyden, P., Scott, K., Runkle, D., Brown, R.L.: Early Proterozoic basement exposures in the southern Canadian Cordillera: core gneiss of the Frenchman Cap, Unit I of the Grand Forks Gneiss, and the Vaseaux Formation. Can. J. Earth Sci. 28, 1169–1201 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnston, D.H., Williams, P.F., Brown, R.L., Crowley, J.L., Carr, S.D.: Northeastward extrusion and extensional exhumation of the crystalline rocks of the Monashee complex, southeastern Canadian Cordillera. J. Struct. Geol. 22, 603–625 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Imrie, A.S., Moore D.P., Enegren, E.G.: Performance and maintenance of the drainage system at Downie Slide. In: Proc 6th International Symposium on Landslides, pp. 751–757. Balkema, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jory, L.T.: Appendix 2 Summary of Geology. Revelstoke Project Downie Slide Investigations Summary of 1973 Exploration Program. BC Hydro Report No. 725, pp. 1–8 (1974)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wheeler, J.O.: Big Bend map-area, British Columbia (82 M east half). Geol. Survey of Can., Paper 64–32, 37 pp. (1965)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patton, F.D., Hodge, R.A.L.: Airphoto study of the Downie Slide British Columbia. Report prepared for the Downie Slide Review Panal British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority Revelstoke Dam Project, pp. 1–21 (1975)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Enegren, E.G.: Re-assessment of the Static Stability Analysis of Downie Slide 1994. Columbia River—Revelstoke Project Downie Slide. Report No. H2889 (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kjelland, N.: Constraints on GIS-based decision support systems for slope stability analysis via geotechnical modelling. M.Sc.(Eng.) thesis, Dept. Geol. Sci Geol. Eng., Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hutchinson, D.J., Diederichs, M.S., Carranza-Torres, C., Sheriff, C., Kjelland, N., Harrap, R.: Landslide hazard management using geotechnical monitoring, virtual process models and decision support technology. Felsbau: Rock Soil Eng. 24(3), 24–29 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Agliardi, F., Crosta, G., Zanchi, A.: Structural constraints on deep-seated slope deformation kinematics. Eng. Geol. 59, 83–102 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kalenchuk, K.S., Hutchinson, D.J., Diederichs, M.S.: Application of spatial prediction techniques to defining three-dimensional landslide shear surface geometry. Landslides 6(4), 321–333 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B.C. Hydro: Summary of 1973 Exploration Program. B.C. Hydro Engineering Hydroelectric Design Division. Report Serial No. 725 (1974)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bourne, D.R., Imrie, A.S., Wade, M.D.: Downie Slide Investigations Report on 1976–1977 Field Work. B.C. Hydro Hydroelectric Generation Projects Division. Report No. HE.C. 925 (1978)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bourne, D.R., Imrie, A.S.: Downie Slide Investigations Report on 1981 Drilling Program. B.C. Hydro Hydroelectric Generation Projects Division. Report No. H 1469 (1981)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gerraghty, D., Lewis, M.: Downie Slide Field Report on contract CR-10A Geology and Construction. B.C. Hydro and Power Authority (1983)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cundall, P., Hart, R.D.: Numerical Modelling of Discontinua. In: Hudson (ed.) Comprehensive Rock Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 231–241. Pergamon, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jing, L., Hudson, J.A.: Numerical Methods in Rock Mechanics. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39, 409–427 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., 2003. 3DEC 3 Dimensional Distinct Element Code: Theory and Background. Excerpts from Version 3.0 Program Manual (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hart, R.D.: Chapter 10: an introduction to distinct element modelling for rock engineering. In: Hudson (ed.) Comprehensive Rock Engineering Volume 2: Analysis and Design Methods, pp. 245–261. Pergamon, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Duncan, J.M., Goodman, R.E.: Finite element analyses of slopes in jointed rock, U.S. Army, Waterways Experiment Station. Report CR-68–3 (1996)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bandis, S.C., Lumsden, A.C., Barton, N.R.: Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 20(6), 249–268 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalenchuk, K.S., Hutchinson, D.J., Diederichs, M.S.: Influence of shear surface geometry on deformation processes in massive landslides. In: 3rd Canada-US Rock Mechanics Symposium, 20th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, pp. 1–10. Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kalenchuk, K.S, Hutchinson, D.J., Diederichs, M.S.: Downie Slide - Interpretations of complex slope mechanics in a massive, slow moving, translational landslide. In: Diederichs, M., Grasselli, G. (eds.) Proc. of GeoHalifax2009 - Canadian Geotechnical Conf., pp. 367–374. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine S. Kalenchuk
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mark S. Diederichs
    • 1
  • D. Jean Hutchinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological Sciences and Geological EngineeringQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Mine Design EngineeringKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations