Population genetics, speciation, and hybridization in Dicerandra (Lamiaceae), a North American Coastal Plain endemic, and implications for conservation

  • Adam C. PaytonEmail author
  • Andre A. NaranjoEmail author
  • Walter Judd
  • Matthew Gitzendanner
  • Pamela S. Soltis
  • Douglas E. Soltis
Research Article


Understanding patterns of speciation and subsequent gene flow can clarify the evolutionary origins and history of species endemic to a specific geographic region and reveal genetic patterns important for conservation and management of rare species. We chose Dicerandra from the North American Coastal Plain biodiversity hotspot as a model to explore these concepts because of its endemism and the threatened status of most of its species. Using microsatellite-based population-level analyses of 32 populations from four of the annual species (D. linearifolia var. linearifolia, D. linearifolia var. robustior, D. fumella, D. odoratissima, and D. radfordiana), we addressed questions of genetic diversity, population structure, and hybridization. Strong support was found for the species-level recognition of the recently described D. fumella from the Florida panhandle. Dicerandra linearifolia var. linearifolia showed some regional cohesion of populations, but there was no consistent geographic pattern to the clustering of populations. Dicerandra radfordiana showed consistent clustering with proximate populations of D. odoratissima. Given that D. radfordiana is found at the southeastern extreme of the range of D. odoratissima, these populations may represent the early stages of speciation by isolation. While there are morphological and bioclimatic niche distinctions between D. odoratissima and D. radfordiana, there is no molecular support for a distinct D. radfordiana. Overall, there is modest genetic diversity found at the population level for all Dicerandra annuals. Microsatellite data support previously proposed hypotheses of hybridization between D. linearifolia var. linearifolia and D. odoratissima, but do not support such hypotheses for D. fumella and D. linearifolia var. robustior.


Genetic structure Population isolation Endemism Microsatellites Dicerandra Conservation 



This work was supported by research grants from the Florida Native Plant Society and the University of Florida Biology Department (to A.C.P.). Additional support was provided by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1315138 and DGE-1842473 (to A.A.N).

Supplementary material

10592_2019_1154_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1713 KB)


  1. Allen JM, Germain-Aubrey CC, Barve N, Neubig KM, Majure LC, Laffan SW, Mishler BD, Owens HL, Smith SA, Whitten WM, Abbott JR, Soltis DE, Guralnick R, Soltis PS (2019) Spatial phylogenetics of Florida vascular plants: the effects of calibration and uncertainty on diversity estimates. iScience 11:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin BG (2007) Adaptive radiation of shrubby tarweeds (Deinandra) in the California Islands parallels diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae–Madiinae). Am J Bot 94:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball MC, Finnegan L, Manseau M et al (2010) Integrating multiple analytical approaches to spatially delineate and characterize genetic population structure: an application to boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Canada. Conserv Genet 11:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blischak P, Chifman J, Wolfe AD, Kubatko LS (2018) HyDe: a python package for genome-scale hybridization detection. Syst Biol 67:821–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castoe T, Poole A, GU W et al (2010) Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix) microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence. Mol Ecol Resour 10:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christman SP, Judd WS (1990) Notes on plants endemic to Florida scrub. Fla Sci 53:52–73Google Scholar
  7. Clivati D, Gitzendanner MA, Hilsdorf AWS, Araújo WL, Miranda VFO (2012) Microsatellite markers developed for Utricularia reniformis (Lentibulariaceae). Am J Bot 99:375–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Queiroz K (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol 56:879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Degnan JH (2018) Modeling hybridization under the network multispecies coalescent. Syst Biol 67:786–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Earl D, VonHoldt B (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards C, Soltis D, Soltis P (2008) Using patterns of genetic structure based on microsatellite loci to test hypotheses of current hybridization, ancient hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting in Conradina (Lamiaceae). Mol Ecol 17:5157–5174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estill J, Cruzan M (2001) Phytogeography of rare plant species endemic to the southeastern United States. Castanea 66:3–23Google Scholar
  13. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Excoffier L, Lischer H (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Folk RA, Soltis P, Soltis D, Guralnick R (2018a) New prospects in the detection and comparative analysis of hybridization in the tree of life. Am J Bot 105:364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Folk R, Visger C, Soltis P, Soltis D, Guralnick R (2018b) Geographic range dynamics drove ancient hybridization in a lineage of angiosperms. Am Nat 192:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Givnish et al (2008) Origin, adaptive radiation and diversification of the Hawaiian lobeliads (Asterales: Campanulaceae). Proc R Soc B 276:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon A (2008) Fastx-toolkit. Accessed Jan 2019
  19. Hoban SM, Hauffe HC, Pérez-Espona S et al (2013) Bringing genetic diversity to the forefront of conservation policy and management. Conserv Genet Resour 5:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huck R (1987) Systematics and evolution of Dicerandra (Labiatae). Phanerogamarum Monogr 19:1–343Google Scholar
  21. Huck R (2010) Dicerandra fumella (Lamiaceae), a new species in the Florida panhandle and adjacent Alabama, with comments on the D. linearifolia complex. Rhodora 112:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg N (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jost L, Archer F, Flanagan S, Gaggiotti O, Hoban S, Latch E (2017) Differentiation measures for conservation genetics. Evol Appl 11:1139–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalinowski ST (2011) The computer program STRUCTURE does not reliably identify the main genetic clusters within species: simulations and implications for human population structure. Heredity 106:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kruckeberg A, Rabinowitz D (1985) Biological aspects of endemism in higher plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:447–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laikre L (2010) Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conserv Genet 11:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laikre L et al (2010) Neglect of genetic diversity in implementation of the convention of biological diversity. Conserv Biol 24:86–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meirmans PG (2015) Seven common mistakes in population genetics and how to avoid them. Mol Ecol 24:3223–3231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meirmans P, Hedrick P (2011) Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol Ecol Resour 11:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meirmans P, Van Tiederen P (2004) GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes 4:792–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Menges E (1992) Habitat preferences and response to disturbance for Dicerandra frutescens, a Lake Wales Ridge (Florida) endemic plant. Bull Torrey Bot Club 119:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Myers R, Ewel J (1990) Ecosystems of Florida. Myers and Ewel (ed). University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, pp 35–69, 150–193Google Scholar
  35. Nosil P (2008) Speciation with gene flow could be common. Mol Ecol 19:2103–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Noss RF, Platt WJ, Sorrie BA, Weakley AS, Means DB, Costanza J, Peet RK (2015) How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers Distrib 21:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliveira LO, Huck RB, Gitzendanner MA, Judd WS, Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2007) Molecular phylogeny, biogeography, and systematics of Dicerandra (Lamiaceae), a genus endemic to the southeastern United States. Am J Bot 94:1017–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peakall R, Smouse P (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2009) Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol Evol 24:386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pollock LJ, Rosauer DF, Thornhill AH et al (2015) Phylogenetic diversity meets conservation policy: small areas are key to preserving eucalypt lineages. Philos Trans R Soc B 370:20140007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959Google Scholar
  42. Rieseberg L, Soltis D (1991) Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol Trends Plants 5:65–84Google Scholar
  43. Rosenberg N (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Misener S, Krawetz SA (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology, vol 132. Humana Press, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  46. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swafford D (2003) PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  48. USFWS (2007) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 5-year review of 22 southeastern species. Fed Reg 72:20866–20868Google Scholar
  49. Wendel J, Doyle J (1998) Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis S, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants II. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 265–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wheeler Q, Meier R (2000) Species concepts and phylogenetic theory. Columbia University Press, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  51. Wunderlin RP, Hanson BF (2011) Guide to the vascular plants of Florida, 3rd edn. University Press of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations