Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

The coming of age of conservation genetics in Latin America: what has been achieved and what needs to be done

  • Juan Pablo Torres-Florez
  • Warren E. Johnson
  • Mariana F. Nery
  • Eduardo Eizirik
  • María A. Oliveira-Miranda
  • Pedro Manoel GalettiJr
Review Article

Abstract

Genetic research is a well-recognized component of understanding biodiversity and is an invaluable approach for documenting and mitigating increasingly high rates of loss. Here we present a quantitative synthesis of conservation genetics science in Latin America and its progress, focusing on evolving trends on different taxonomic groups, environments and markers. We reviewed 528 conservation genetics research papers published in 57 journals from 1992 to 2013. Brazil and Mexico were the most represented countries in the literature and there was a marked disparity between terrestrial (~64%) and aquatic-marine research (~36%). More than a third or the articles focused on plants (~35%) while the other (65%) were animal studies with a clear emphasis on mammals (35%) and bony fishes (24%). Most research (42%) addressed patterns of population structure, while 17% focused on genetic diversity issues and 14% focused on the description of novel genetic markers. Finally, although genetics has become an integral part of conservation biology, genetic analyses have often not been completely integrated into the development of conservation and management strategies and formal policies. We discuss the levels to which these types of studies can effectively contribute to biodiversity conservation in this region, and offer suggestions on how conservation genetic approaches may be used more broadly, enhancing the connectivity between scientists and policy makers.

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation Conservation goals Conservation genomics Conservation policy makers Genetic biodiversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a FAPESP postdoctoral fellowship (2013/23198-0) to JPTF, together with a visiting researcher FAPESP Grant (2014/12681-5) to PMGJ and WEJ. PMGJ also thanks CNPq (308385/2014-4 and 401401/2014-6).

References

  1. Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11:697–709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow J, Calambokidis J, Falcone EA et al (2011) Humpback whale abundance in the North Pacific estimated by photographic capture-recapture with bias correction from simulation studies. Mar Mamm Sci 27:793–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnosky AD, Matzke M, Tomiya S et al (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471:51–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benirschke K, Kumamoto AT (1991) Mammalian cytogenetics and conservation of species. J Hered 82:187–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourlat SJ, Borja A, Gilbert J et al (2013) Genomics in marine monitoring: new opportunities for assessing marine health status. Mar Pollut Bull 74:19–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen BW, Abreu-Grobois FA, Balazs GH, Kamezaki N, Limpus CJ, Ferl RJ (1995) Trans-Pacific migrations of the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) demonstrated with mitochondrial DNA markers. PNAS 92:3771–3774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman J, Greenhorn JE, Marrotte RR, McKay MM, Morris KY, Mrentice MB, Wehtje M (2016) On application of landscape genetics. Conserv Genet 17:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardoso MA, Provan J, Powell W, Ferreiras PCE, de Oliveira PE (1998) High genetic differentiation among remnant populations of the endangered Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae). Mol Ecol 7:601–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceballos G, Brown JH (1995) Global patterns of mammalian diversity, endemism, and endangerment. Conserv Biol 9:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceballos G, Vale GMM, Bonacic C et al (2009) Conservation challenges for the Austral and Neotropical America section. Conserv Biol 23:811–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Costello MJ, May RM, Stork NE (2013) Can we name earth’s species before they go extinct? Science 339:413–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De-Franco B, Mendonça FF, Hashimoto DT, Porto-Foresti F, Oliveira C, Foresti F (2010) Forensic identification of the guitarfish species Rhinobatos horkelli, R. percellens and Zapteryx brevirostris using multiplex-PCR. Mol Ecol Resour 10:197–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, Ceballos G, Isaac NJ, Collen B (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345:401–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eguiarte LE, Perez-Nasser N, Piñero D (1992) Genetic structure, outcrosing rate and heterosis in Astrocaryum mexicanum (tropical palm): implications for evolution and conservation. Heredity 69:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol Conserv 96:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher MC, Garner TW, Walker SF (2009) Global emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and amphibian chytridiomycosis in space, time, and host. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:291–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Frankel OH, Bennett E (1970) Genetic resources: introduction. In: Frankel OH, Bennett E (eds) Genetic resources in plants: their exploration and conservation. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 7–17Google Scholar
  18. Frankel OH, Soulé M (1981) Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankham R (2010) Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. Biol Conserv 143:1919–1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Funk WC, McKay JK, Hohenlohe PA, Allendorf FW (2012) Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. TREE 27:489–496PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaynor KM, Fiorella KJ, Gregory GH, Kurz DJ, Seto KL, Withey LS, Brashares JS (2016) War and wildlife: linking armed conflict to conservation. Front Ecol Environ 14:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gompert Z (2012) Population genomics as a new tool for wildlife management. Mol Ecol 21:1542–1544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. González S, Maldonado JE, Leonard JA, Vilá C, Barbanti-Duarte JM, Merino M, Brum-Zorilla N, Wayne RK (1998) Conservation genetics of the endangered Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus). Mol Ecol 7:47–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. González-Astorga J, Vovides AP, Cruz-Angon A, Octavio-Aguilar P, Iglesias C (2005) Allozyme variation in the three extant populations of the narrowly endemic cycad Dioon angustifolium Miq. (Zamiaceae) from North-eastern Mexico. Ann Bot-London 95:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. González-Astorga J, Vergara-Silva F, Vovides A, Nicolalde-Morejón F, Cabrera-Toledo D, Pérez-Farrera MA (2008) Diversity and genetic structure of three species of Dioon Lindl. (Zamiaceae, Cycadales) from the Pacific seaboard of Mexico. Biol J Linn Soc 94:765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon IJ, Evans DM, Garner TWJ et al (2014) Enhancing communication between conservation biologists and conservation practitioners: letter from the conservation front line. Anim Conserv 17:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haig SM, Wagner RS, Forsman ED, Mullins TD (2001) Geographic variation and genetic structure in spotted owls. Conserv Genet 2:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haig SM, Miller MP, Bellinger MR, Draheim HM, Mercer DM, Mullins TD (2016) The conservation genetics juggling act: integrating genetics and ecology science policy. Evol Appl 9:181–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Heino M, Kummu M, Makkonen M, Mulligan M, Verburg PH, Jalava M, Räsänen TA (2015) Forest loss in protected areas and intact forest landscapes: a global analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e0138918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoban SM, Hauffe HC, Pérez-Espona S et al (2013a) Bringing genetic diversity to the forefront of conservation policy and management. Conserv Genet Resour 5:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoban SM, Arntzen JW, Bertorelle G et al (2013b) Conservation genetic resources for effective species survival (ConGRESS): bridging the divide between conservation research and practice. J Nat Conserv 21:433–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hogg CJ, Grueber CE, Pemberton D et al (2017) ‘Devil Tools & Tech’: a synergy of conservation research and management practice. Conserv Lett 10:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes AR, Brian DI, Marc TJJ, Nora U, Mark V (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Inza MV, Zelener N, Fornes L, Gallo LA (2012) Effect of latitudinal gradient and impact of logging on genetic diversity of Cedrela lilloi along the Argentine Yungas Rainforest. Ecol Evol 2:2722–2736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Jamieson IG, Wallis GP, Briskie JV (2006) Inbreeding and endangered species management: is New Zealand out of step with the rest of the world? Conserv Biol 20:38–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Laikre L (2010) Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation. Conserv Genet 11:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lara-Ruiz P, Chiarello AG, Santos FR (2008) Extreme population divergence and conservation implications for the rare endangered Atlantic Forest sloth, Bradypus torquatus (Pilosa: Bradypodidae). Biol Conserv 141:1332–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. TREE 17:386–391Google Scholar
  39. Leisher C, Touval J, Hess S, Boucher T, Reymondin L (2013) Land and forest degradation inside protected areas in Latin America. Diversity 5:779–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lenhard SC, Witter JA (1977) Insects as biological indicators of environmental change. Bull Entomol Soc Am 23:191–193Google Scholar
  41. Levin II, Zwiers P, Deem SL et al (2013) Multiple lineages of Avian malaria parasites (Plasmodium) in the Galapagos Islands and evidence for arrival via migratory birds. Conserv Biol 27:1366–1377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lousada JM, Borba EL, Ribeiro KT, Ribeiro LC, Lovato MB (2011) Genetic structure and variability of the endemic and vulnerable Vellozia gigantea (Velloziaceae) associated with the landscape in the Espinhaco Range, in southeastern Brazil: implications for conservation. Genetica 139:431–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Male TD, Bean MJ (2005) Measuring progress in US endangered species conservation. Ecol Lett 9:986:992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mariguela TC, De-Franco B, Almeida TVV, Mendonça FF, Gadig OBF, Foresti F, Oliveira C (2009) Identification of guitarfish species Rhinobatos percellens, R. horkelli, and Zapteryx brevirostris (Chondrichthyes) using mitochondrial genes and RFLP technique. Conserv Genet Resour 1:393–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marín JC, Corti P, Saucedo C, González BA (2009) Application of DNA forensic techniques for identifying poached guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in Chilean Patagonia. J Forensic Sci 54:1073–1076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Márquez A, Maldonado JE, González S, Beccaceci MD, Garcia JE, Duarte JMB (2006) Phylogeography and Pleistocene demographic history of the endangered marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) from the Río de la Plata Basin. Conserv Genet 7:563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martín-López B, Montes C, Ramírez L, Benayas J (2009) What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol Conserv 142:1370–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mendez M, Gomez A, Bynum N, Medellin R, Porzecanski AL, Sterling E (2007) Availability of formal academic programs in conservation biology in Latin America. Conserv Biol 21:1399–1403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  50. Mora C, Rollo A, Tittensor DP (2013) Comment on “can we name earth’s species before they go extinct?” Science 341:237–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Morafka D, Aguirre G, Murphy RW (1994) Allozyme differentiation among gopher tortoises (Gopherus): conservation genetics and phylogenetic and taxonomic implications. Can J Zool 72:1665–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Oliveira-Miranda MA, Martino AM, De Oliveira-Miranda RM, Balboa K, Aguilera M (2013) Conserving the genetic diversity of plants in Austral and Neotropical America (ANA): a metanalysis of published studies using samples of the region. Bot Rev 79:449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pérez-Espona S, ConGRESS Consortium (2017) Conservation genetics in the European Union - biases, gaps and future directions. Biol Cons 209:130–136Google Scholar
  55. Piggott MP, Chao NL, Beheregaray LB (2011) Three fishes in one: cryptic species in an Amazonian floodplain forest specialist. Biol J Linn Soc 102:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pimper LE, Goodall N, Olavarria C, Baker S, Remis MI (2010) Mitochondrial DNA variation and population structure of Commerson’s dolphins (Cephalorhynchus commersonii) in their southernmost distribution. Conserv Genet 11:2157–2168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pinzon JH, LaJeunesse TC (2011) Species delimitation of common reef corals in the genus Pocillopora using nucleotide sequence phylogenies, population genetics and symbiosis ecology. Mol Ecol 20:311–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Poelstra JW, Vijay N, Bossu CM et al (2014) The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 344:1410–1414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pope TR (1998) Genetic variation in remnant populations of the woolly spider monkey (Brachyteles arachnoides). Int J Primatol 19:95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pounds JA, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, Fogden MPL, Foster PN, La Marca E, Masters KL, Merino-Viteri A, Puschendorf R, Ron SR, Sánchez-Azofeifa GA, Still CJ, Young BE (2006) Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439:161–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramey RR (1995) Mitochondrial DNA variation, population structure, and evolution of mountain sheep in the south-western United States and Mexico. Mol Ecol 4:429–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Ray DA, Dever JA, Platt SG (2004) Low levels of nucleotide diversity in Crocodylus moreletii and evidence of hybridization with C. acutus. Conserv Genet 5:449–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rodriguez JP, Simonetti JA, Premoli A, Marini MA (2005) Conservation in Austral and Neotropical America: building scientific capacity equal to the challenges. Conserv Biol 19:969–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rodríguez-Clark KM, Oliveira-Miranda MA, Meneses MA et al (2015) Finding the “conservation” in conservation genetics-progress in Latin America. J Hered 106:423–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sagarin R, Carlsson J, Duval M et al (2009) Bringing molecular tools into environmental resource management: untangling the molecules to policy pathway. PloS Biol 7:426–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sgorbati S, Labra M, Grugni E et al (2004) A survey of genetic diversity and reproductive biology of Puya raimondii (Bromeliaceae), the endangered queen of the Andes. Plant Biol 6:222–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Shafer ABA, Wolf JBW, Alves PC et al (2015) Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. TREE 30:78–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shamblin BM, Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB, Hillis-Starr ZM, Lundgren I, Naro-Maciel E, Nairn CJ (2012) Mitogenomic sequences better resolve stock structure of southern Greater Caribbean green turtle rookeries. Mol Ecol 21:2330–2340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Steiner CC, Putnam AS, Hoeck PE, Ryder OA (2013) Conservation genomics of threatened animal species. Ann RevAnim Biosci 1:261–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Struebig MJ, Kingston T, Petit EJ, Le Comber SC, Zubaid A, Mohd-Adnan A, Rossiter SJ (2011) Parallel declines in species and genetic diversity in tropical forest fragments. Ecol Lett 14:582–590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischmann DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Tagliaro CH, Schneider MPC, Schneider H, Sampaio IC, Stanhope MJ (1997) Marmoset phylogenetics, conservation perspectives, and evolution of the mtDNA control region. Mol Biol Evol 14:674–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Templeton AR, Robertson RJ, Brisson J, Strasburg J (2001) Disrupting evolutionary processes: the effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks. PNAS 98:5426–5432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Torres-Florez JP, Hucke-Gaete R, LeDuc R et al (2014) Blue whale population structure along the eastern South Pacific Ocean: evidence of more than one population. Mol Ecol 23:5998–6010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Trigo TC, Schneider A, Oliveira TG, Lehugeur L, Silveira L, Freitas TRO, Eizirik E (2013) Molecular data reveal complex hybridization and a cryptic species of neotropical wild cat. Curr Biol 23:2528–2533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Noorden R (2014) South America by the numbers. Nature 510:202–203Google Scholar
  77. Vianna JA, Bonde RK, Caballero S et al (2006) Phylogeography, phylogeny and hybridization in trichechid sirenians: implications for manatee conservation. Mol Ecol 15:433–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Welsh HH, Ollivier LM (1998) Stream amphibians as indicators of ecosystem stress: a case study from California’s redwoods. Ecol Appl 8:1118–1132Google Scholar
  79. Wilson JRU, Proches S, Braschler B, Dixon ES, Richardson DM (2007) The bio(diversity) of science reflects the interests of society. Front Ecol Environ 5:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Woolaver LG, Nichols RK, Morton E, Stutchbury BJ (2013) Population genetics and relatedness in a critically endangered island raptor, Ridgway’s Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Conserv Genet 14:559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yahnke CJ, Johnson WE, Geffen E et al (1996) Darwin’s fox: a distinct endangered species in a vanishing habitat. Conserv Biol 10:366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Young DL, Allard MW (1997) Conservation genetics of the plain pigeon Columba inornata in Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic. Mol Ecol 6:877–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhou X, Sun F, Xu S et al (2013) Baiji genomes reveal low genetic variability and new insights into secondary aquatic adaptations. Nat Commun 4:2708–2713PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Genética e EvoluçãoUniversidade Federal de São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological ParkFront RoyalUSA
  3. 3.Departamento de Genética, Evolução e BioagentesUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  4. 4.Faculdade de BiociênciasPUCRSPorto AlegreBrazil
  5. 5.Direction of Research and Development, ProvitaCaracasVenezuela

Personalised recommendations