Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strong genetic differentiation and low genetic diversity of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) in the southwestern European distribution range

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic diversity of European freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.), appears exceptional with highest genetic variability found in the northernmost European populations of Scandinavia and lower genetic variability in central and southern Europe. The objective of this study was to investigate genetic diversity and differentiation of 14 southernmost populations on the Iberian Peninsula which greatly differ in terms of life span and habitat conditions from the rest of central and northern European populations. The analyses of ten microsatellite loci revealed a pronounced level of genetic divergence and very low genetic diversity. These results match the expectations of geographically peripheral populations with respect to their genetic composition. The life history strategy, the narrow ecological niche of the species, and anthropogenic habitat modifications have most likely shaped the genetic pattern of Iberian pearl mussel populations. The peripheral position with less optimal habitat conditions may increase the extinction risk of these populations and thus effective conservation strategies for the Iberian M. margaritifera are needed. The successful conservation of the species at its southwestern margin requires inclusion of genetically different conservation units which may reveal local adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araujo R, Ramos MA (2001) Action plan for Margaritifera margaritifera. In: Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats (Bern convention). Council of Europe Publishing. Nature and Environment, 117, Strasbourg, pp 29–66

  • Araujo R, Toledo C, Van Damme D, Ghamizi M, Machordom A (2009) Margaritifera marocana (Pallary, 1918): a valid species inhabiting Moroccan rivers. J Mollusc Stud 75:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1986) The status of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in the South of its European range. Biol Conserv 38:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1987) Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. J Anim Ecol 56:691–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer G (1994) The adaptive value of offspring size among freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). J Anim Ecol 63:933–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker C, Lueders T, Mueller M, Pander J, Geist J (2016) Alteration of physico-chemical and microbial properties in freshwater substrates by burrowing invertebrates. Limnologica 59:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogan AE (1993) Freshwater bivalve extinctions (Mollusca: Unionida): a search for causes. Am Zool 33:599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouza C, Castro J, Martínez P, Amaro R, Fernández C, Ondina P, Outeiro A, San Miguel E (2007) Threatened freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. in NW Spain: low and very structured genetic variation in southern peripheral populations assessed using microsatellite markers. Conserv Genet 8:937–948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridle JR, Vines TH (2007) Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol Evol 22:140–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassel-Lundhagen A, Tammaru T, Windig JJ, Ryrholm N, Nylin S (2009) Are peripheral populations special? Congruent patterns in two butterfly species. Ecography 32:591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channell R, Lomolino MV (2000) Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species. Nature 403:84–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciofi C, Bruford MW (1999) Genetic structure and gene flow among Komodo dragon populations inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Mol Ecol 8:17–30. 2MOD programme. http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/~mab/software.html

  • Cohan FM (1984) Can uniform selection retard random genetic divergence between isolated conspecific populations? Evolution 38:495–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denic M, Taeubert JE, Geist J (2015) Trophic relationships between the larvae of two freshwater mussels and their fish hosts. Invertebr Biol 134:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J (2010) Strategies for the conservation of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera L.): a synthesis of conservation genetics and ecology. Hydrobiologia 644:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J (2015) Seven steps towards improving freshwater conservation. Aquat Conserv 25:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Auerswald K (2007) Physicochemical stream bed characteristics and recruitment of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). Freshw Biol 52:2299–2316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Kuehn R (2005) Genetic diversity and differentiation of central European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) populations: implications for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 14:425–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Kuehn R (2008) Host-parasite interactions in oligotrophic stream ecosystems: the roles of life-history strategy and ecological niche. Mol Ecol 17:997–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Rottman O, Schröder W, Kühn R (2003) Development of microsatellite markers for endangered freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Mol Ecol Notes 3:444–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Porkka M, Kuehn R (2006) The status of host fish populations and fish species richness in European freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) streams. Aquat Conserv 16:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist J, Söderberg H, Karlberg A, Kuehn R (2010) Drainage-independent genetic structure and high genetic diversity of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in northern Europe. Conserv Genet 11:1339–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist AS, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L, O’higgins P (2000) Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evol Dev 2:114–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, version 2.9.3: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html

  • Gum B, Lange M, Geist J (2011) A critical reflection on the success of rearing and culturing of juvenile freshwater mussels with a focus on the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Aquat Conserv 21:743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) Adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2008) G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson S, Larsen BM, Hindar K (2014) Host-dependent genetic variation in freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.). Hydrobiologia 735:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH (1997) Evolution of a species’ range. Am Nat 150:1–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lesica P, Allendorf F (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol 4:753–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D (1970) Developmental instability and evolution in peripheral isolates. Am Nat 104:343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lois S, Ondina P, Outeiro A, Amaro R, San Miguel E (2014) The north-west of the Iberian Peninsula is crucial for conservation of Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) in Europe. Aquat Conserv 24:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lois S, Cowley DE, Outeiro A, San Miguel E, Amaro R, Ondina P (2015) Spatial extent of biotic interactions affects species distribution and abundance in river networks: the freshwater pearl mussel and its hosts. J Biogeogr 42:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes-Lima M, Sousa R, Geist J et al (2016) Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Biol Rev. doi:10.1111/brv.12244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KS, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, Thompson FG (2004) The global decline of nonmarine molluscs. BioScience 54:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machordom A, Araujo R, Erpenbeck D, Ramos MA (2003) Phylogeography and conservation genetics of endangered European Margaritiferidae (Bivalvia: Unionoidea). Biol J Linn Soc 78:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez P, Bouza C, Castro J, Hermida M, Pardo BG, Sanchez L (2007) Analysis of a secondary contact between divergent lineages of brown trout Salmo trutta L. from Duero basin using microsatellites and mtDNA RFLPs. J Fish Biol 71:195–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, Nurthen RK, Gilligan DM, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2000) Relationships between population size and loss of genetic diversity: comparisons of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Conserv Genet 1:33–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morales J, Lizana M (2014) Efectos negativos del cambio climático aceleran la extinción de la principal población de la náyade Margaritifera margaritifera L., 1758 en la cuenca del Duero. Munibe 62:103–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of genetic distances and phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19:153–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ota T (1993) DISPAN: genetic distance and phylogenetic analyses software. Pennsylvania State University, State College

    Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) Bottleneck: a computer programme for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version-1.2) population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fristch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • San Miguel E, Montserrat S, Fernández C, Amaro R, Hermida M, Ondina P, Altaba CR (2004) Growth models and longevity of freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera) in Spain. Can J Zool 82:1370–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos RMB, Sanches Fernandes LF, Varandas SGP, Pereira MG, Sousa R, Teixeira A, Lopes-Lima M, Cortes RMV, Pacheco FAL (2015) Impacts of climate change and land-use scenarios on Margaritifera margaritifera, an environmental indicator and endangered species. Sci Total Environ 511:477–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa R, Amorim A, Sobral C, Froufe E, Varandas S, Teixeira A, Lopes-Lima M (2013) Ecological status of a Margaritifera margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758) population at the southern edge of its distribution (River Paiva, Portugal). Environ Manag 52:1230–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa R, Amorim Â, Froufe E, Varandas S, Teixeira A, Lopes-Lima M (2015) Conservation status of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera in Portugal. Limnologica 50:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Dowling JA, Haag WR, King TL, Layzer JB, Newton TJ, Nichols SJ (2004) Changing perspectives on pearly mussels, North America’s most imperilled animals. BioScience 54:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GR, Taylor J, de Leaniz CG (2010) Captive breeding of the endangered freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera. Endanger Species Res 12:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varandas S, Lopes-Lima M, Teixeira A, Hinzmann M, Reis J, Cortes R, Machado J, Sousa R (2013) Ecology of southern European pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera): first record of two new populations on the rivers Terva and Beça (Portugal). Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 23:374–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CC, Hakenkamp CC (2001) The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 46:1431–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn CC, Taylor CM (1999) Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case of an extinction gradient. Conserv Biol 13:912–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco JC, Araujo R, Bueno R, Laguna A (2002) Descubierta la población europea más meridional de la madreperla de río Margaritifera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia, Unionoida), en la Península Ibérica (Río Agueda, Salamanca). Iberus 20:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco JC, Araujo R, Balset J, Toledo C, Machordom A (2006) Primeros datos sobre la presencia de Margaritifera margaritifera L. (Bivalvia, Unionoida) en la cuenca del Tajo (España). Iberus 24:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wächtler K, Dreher-Mansur MC, Richter T (2001) 6 larval types and early postlarval biology naiads. In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (eds) Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoidea. Ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CD, Beatty GE, Bradley CR, Clarke HC, Preston SJ, Roberts D, Provan J (2012) The importance of population genetic information in formulating ex situ conservation strategies for the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) in Northern Ireland. Anim Conserv 15:593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young MR, Cosgrove PJ, Hastie LC (2001) The extent of, and causes for, the decline of a highly threatened naiad: Margaritifera margaritifera. In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (eds) Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionida. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–358

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express special thanks to H. Bayerl for his support with genotyping. We are also very grateful to Joaquim Reis, for his help with sampling, and Javier Morales for providing the samples from Zamora (Spain). Also invaluable was the help of Dr. Santos del Campo (Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain) who provided one of the sequencers for genotyping.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annie Machordom.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 499 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoeckle, B.C., Araujo, R., Geist, J. et al. Strong genetic differentiation and low genetic diversity of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.) in the southwestern European distribution range. Conserv Genet 18, 147–157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0889-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0889-3

Keywords

Navigation