Conservation Genetics

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 235–240 | Cite as

Population genetics of the endangered Crowned Solitary Eagle (Buteogallus coronatus) in South America

  • David Canal
  • Séverine Roques
  • Juan J. Negro
  • José H. Sarasola
Short Communication


The Crowned Solitary Eagle (Buteogallus coronatus) is one of the rarest and most severely threatened birds of prey in the Neotropical region. We studied levels of neutral genetic diversity, population structure, and the demographic history of the species using 55 contemporary samples covering a large fraction of the species range, which were genotyped at 17 microsatellite loci. Our results indicated genetic homogeneity across the sampled regions, which may be explained by a high dispersal capability of Crowned Solitary Eagles resulting in high gene flow or relatively recent population expansion. Further demographic tests revealed that the species has experienced a recent demographic reduction, but inbreeding was not detected. The existing connectivity between geographically separated populations may have buffered the negative effects of the demographic bottleneck. Alternatively, the demographic reduction may be too recent to detect a genetic signature due to the long generation time of the species. Potential conservation strategies, including the possibility of translocations of individuals, are discussed.


Population genetics Bottleneck Genetic structure Birds of prey Conservation 



The authors are very grateful to all zoos and wildlife rescue centers that were kind enough to provide samples: Estación Experimental Horco Molle, Zoológico de Buenos Aires, Zoológico Bubalcó (Río Negro), Zoológico de San Rafael (Mendoza), and Zoológico de Mendoza as well as LEM–EBD allowing us to use their installations during lab work. The authors gratefully appreciate the collaboration of Claudina Solaro, Maximiliano Galmes, and Juan Ignacio Zanón-Martinez in sample collection and lab analysis. The authors are also very grateful to V. Friesen and five anonymous referees for several key suggestions that strongly improved a previous draft of the manuscript, as well as Sarah Young for English proofreading. This study was funded by The Peregrine Fund and the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID).

Supplementary material

10592_2016_878_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)


  1. Alcaide M, Serrano D, Tella JL, Negro JJ (2009) Strong philopatry derived from capture-recapture records does not lead to fine-scale genetic differentiation in lesser kestrels. J Anim Ecol 78:468–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01493.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez T (1933) Observaciones biológicas sobre las aves del Uruguay. An del Mus Hist Nat Montevideo 4:1–50Google Scholar
  3. Andris M, Arias MC, Barthel BL et al (2012) Permanent genetic resources added to molecular ecology resources database 1 february 2012–31 march 2012. Mol Ecol Resour 12:779–781. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03155.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartley D, Bagley M, Gall G, Bentley B (1992) Use of linkage disequilibrium data to estimate effective size of hatchery and natural fish populations. Conserv Biol 6:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, et al (2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellocq MI, Bonaventura SM, Marcelino FN, Sabatini M (1998) Habitat use of crowned eagles (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) in the southern limits of the species’ range. J Raptor Res 32:312–314Google Scholar
  7. Bellocq MI, Ramírez-Llorens P, Filloy J (2002) Recent records of crowned eagles (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) from Argentina, 1981–2000. J Raptor Res 36:206–212Google Scholar
  8. BirdLife International (2012) Buteogallus coronatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e.T22695855A37825517Google Scholar
  9. Di Rienzo A, Peterson A, Garza J et al (1994) Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Do C, Waples RS, Peel D et al (2014) NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 14:209–214. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12157 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Earl DA, VonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fandiño B, Pautasso A (2014) Distribution, natural history and conservation of Harpyhaliaetus coronatus (Birds: accipitridae) in central-east Argentina. Nat Neotrop 44:41–42Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson-Lees J, Christie DA (2001) Raptors of the world. Helm identification guides, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedrick P, Kalinowski S (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 31:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalinowski S, Wagner A, Taper M (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes 6:576–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01256.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller L, Waller D (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:19–23Google Scholar
  19. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology 2. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  20. Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1999) Estimating the effective number of breeders from heterozygote excess in progeny. Genetics 151:1211–1216PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Maceda J (2007) Biología y conservación del Águila Coronada (Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) en Argentina. Hornero 22:159–171Google Scholar
  22. Marshall T, Slate J, Bruuk L, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity. Mol Ecol 7:639–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 7:783–787. doi: 10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newton I (1979) Population ecology of raptors. Poyser, BerkhamstedGoogle Scholar
  25. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503. doi: 10.1093/jhered/90.4.502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Queller D, Goodnight K (1989) Estimating relatedness using molecular markers. Evolution (NY) 43:258–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version 1.2), population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  30. Sarasola JH, Maceda J (2006) Past and current evidence of persecution of the endangered crowned eagle Harpyhaliaetus coronatus in Argentina. Oryx 40:347. doi: 10.1017/S0030605306001013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarasola J, Santillán M, Galmes M (2010) Crowned eagles rarely prey on livestock in central Argentina: persecution is not justified. Endanger Species Res 11:207–213. doi: 10.3354/esr00280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Valière N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cabrera AL (1976) Regiones fitogeográficas Argentinas. In: Ferreira Sobral EF (ed) Enciclopedia Argentina de agricultura y jardinería. Editorial ACME, Buenos Aires, p 1–85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Canal
    • 1
  • Séverine Roques
    • 2
  • Juan J. Negro
    • 1
  • José H. Sarasola
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Evolutionary EcologyDoñana Biological Station – CSICSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Irstea– UR “Ecosystèmes aquatiques et changements globaux”CestasFrance
  3. 3.Centro para el Estudio y Conservación de las Aves Rapaces en Argentina (CECARA), Instituto de las Ciencias Ambientales y de la Tierra de La Pampa (INCITAP)Universidad Nacional de La Pampa – CONICETSanta RosaArgentina
  4. 4.The Peregrine FundBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations