Conservation Genetics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 903–920 | Cite as

Exploring the legacy of goat grazing: signatures of habitat fragmentation on genetic patterns of endemic weevil populations in Northern Isabela Island, Galápagos (Ecuador)

  • Andrea S. Sequeira
  • Courtney C. Stepien
  • Christina T. Tran
  • Austin Stuckert
  • Lázaro Roque Albelo
  • Weixia Guo
Research Article

Abstract

Together with reduction in habitat area and quality, reduction in habitat connectivity is one of the major factors influencing species’ persistence in fragmented landscapes. We explore the consequences of recent habitat fragmentation on volcanoes across Isabela Island, Galápagos by analyzing genetic patterns of populations of endemic weevils whose host plants have been depleted by indiscriminate goat grazing. We predicted that if grazing on the weevils’ host plants has caused habitat fragmentation on the weevils populations themselves, then the effects on the genetic architecture of populations should be more severe on Galapaganus conwayensis populations from volcanoes on Northern Isabela than on those from Santa Cruz or Pinta islands where vegetation destruction was not as extensive. We used mitochondrial sequences to reveal historical colonization patterns and microsatellite variation to understand more contemporary genetic changes. We found significantly lower microsatellite genetic diversity and population size within localities and increased genetic differentiation at a small geographic scale with a stronger isolation by distance pattern and larger numbers of genetic clusters on Isabela. In the absence of long-standing mitochondrial structure within each volcano, we interpret the microsatellite results as suggesting that recent host plant habitat fragmentation may indeed influence the genetic patterns of plant feeding insects and highlight the importance of controlling the spread of introduced herbivores in the Galápagos Islands.

Keywords

Galapaganus conwayensis Microsatellite loci Mitochondrial sequences Within-population variation Population differentiation Genetic clusters 

Supplementary material

10592_2016_831_MOESM1_ESM.docx (75 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 75 kb)

References

  1. Adsersen H (1989) The rare plants of the Galápagos Islands and their conservation. Biol Conserv 47:49–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias-Diego Y, Lobo J (2008) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol 17:5177–5188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amos W, Harwood J (1998) Factors affecting levels of genetic diversity in natural populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 353:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anton C, Zeisset I, Musche M, Durka W, Boomsma JJ, Settele J (2007) Population structure of a large blue butterfly and its specialist parasitoid in a fragmented landscape. Mol Ecol 16:3828–3838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aviron S, Kindlmann P, Burel F (2007) Conservation of butterfly populations in dynamic landscapes: the role of farming practices and landscape mosaic. Ecol Model 205:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beheregaray LB, Gibbs JP, Havill N, Fritts TH, Powell JR, Caccone A (2004) Giant tortoises are not so slow: rapid diversification and biogeographic consensus in the Galápagos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6514–6519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohonak AJ (2002) IBD (isolation by distance): a program for analyses of isolation by distance. J Hered 92:153–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowie RCK (2011) The utility of contemporary and historical estimates of dispersal in determining response to habitat fragmentation in a tropical forest-dependent bird community. Mol Ecol 20:1799–1802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caizergues A, Ratti O, Helle P, Rotelli L, Ellison L, Rasplus JY (2003) Population genetic structure of male black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) in fragmented vs. continuous landscapes. Mol Ecol 12:2297–2305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Callens T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E, Durand EY, Githiru M, Huyghe JR, Lens L (2011) Genetic signature of population fragmentation varies with mobility in seven bird species of a fragmented Kenyan cloud forest. Mol Ecol 20:1829–1844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cegelski CC, Waits LP, Anderson NJ (2003) Assessing population structure and gene flow in Montana wolverines (Gulo gulo) using assignment-based approaches. Mol Ecol 12:2907–2918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B, Tukey PA (1983) Graphical methods for data analysis. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiucchi JE, Gibbs HL (2010) Similarity of contemporary and historical gene flow among highly fragmented populations of an endangered rattlesnake. Mol Ecol 19:5345–5358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark AM, Bowen BW, Branch LC (1999) Effects of natural habitat fragmentation on an endemic scrub lizard (Sceloporus woodi): an historical perspective based on a mitochondrial DNA gene genealogy. Mol Ecol 8:1093–1104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J, Moritz C, Estoup A, Owens IPF (2002) Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8127–8132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Cockerham C, Weir B (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cockerham C, Weir B (1987) Correlations, descent measures: drift with migration and mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:8512–8514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Cruz F, Carrion V, Campbell KJ, Lavoie C, Donlan CJ (2009) Bio-economics of large-scale eradication of feral goats from Santiago Island, Galápagos. J Wildl Manag 73:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Darvill B, O’Connor S, Lye GC, Waters J, Lepais O, Goulson D (2010) Cryptic differences in dispersal lead to differential sensitivity to habitat fragmentation in two bumblebee species. Mol Ecol 19:53–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Moura PA, Quek SP, Cardoso MZ, Kronforst MR (2011) Comparative population genetics of mimetic Heliconius butterflies in an endangered habitat; Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. BMC Genet 12(1):1Google Scholar
  21. De Vries T (1977) Como la caza de chivos afecta la vegetacion en las Islas Santa Fe y Pinta, Galápagos. Revista Universidad Catolica (Quito) 16:171–181Google Scholar
  22. Desender K, Baert L, Maelfait JP, Verdyck P (1999) Conservation on Volcan Alcedo (Galápagos): terrestrial invertebrates and the impact of introduced feral goats. Biol Conserv 87:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diffendorfer JE, Gaines MS, Holt RD (1995) Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, microtus, and Peromyscus). Ecology (Wash DC) 76:827–839Google Scholar
  24. Eliasson U (1982) Changes and constancy in the vegetation of the Galápagos Islands. Not Galapagos 36:7–12Google Scholar
  25. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic conseqences of small population size-implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  27. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv Biol 10:1500–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frankham R (1998) Inbreeding and extinction: Island populations. Conserv Biol 12:665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant PR, Grant BR (1996) Speciation and hybridization in island birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 351:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grummer JA, Calderon-Espinosa ML, Nieto-Montes de Oca A, Smith EN, Mendez-de la Cruz FR, Leache AD (2015) Estimating the temporal and spatial extent of gene flow among sympatric lizard populations (genus Sceloporus) in the southern Mexican highlands. Mol Ecol 24(7):1523–1542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Guillot G, Estoup A, Mortier F, Cosson JF (2005a) A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170:1261–1280CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Guillot G, Mortier F, Estoup A (2005b) GENELAND: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:712–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guillot G, Santos F, Estoup A (2008) Analysing georeferenced population genetics data with Geneland: a new algorithm to deal with null alleles and a friendly graphical user interface. Bioinformatics 24:1406–1407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Haag T, Santos AS, Sana DA, Morato RG, Cullen L, Crawshaw PG, De Angelo C, Di Bitetti MS, Salzano FM, Eizirik E (2010) The effect of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of a top predator: loss of diversity and high differentiation among remnant populations of Atlantic Forest jaguars (Panthera onca). Mol Ecol 19:4906–4921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Habel JC, Schmitt T (2012) The burden of genetic diversity. Biol Conserv 147:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Habel JC, Zachos FE (2012) Habitat fragmentation versus fragmented habitats. Biodivers Conserv 21:2987–2990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Habel JC, Husemann M, Finger A, Danley PD, Zachos FE (2014) The relevance of time series in molecular ecology and conservation biology. Biol Rev 89:484–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hamann O (1979) Regeneration of vegetation on Santa Fé and Pinta islands, Galápagos, after the eradication of goats. Biol Conserv 15:215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamann O (1993) On vegetation recovery, goats and giant tortoises on Pinta Island, Galápagos, Ecuador. Biodivers Conserv 2:138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Hawley DM, Hanley D, Dhondt SA, Lovette I (2006) Molecular evidence for a founder effect in invasive house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) populations experiencing an emergent disease epidemic. Mol Ecol 15:263–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Henle K, Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Saunders DA, Wissel C (2004) Species survival in fragmented landscapes: where are we now? Biodivers Conserv 13:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kolbe JJ, Larson A, Losos JB, de Queiroz K (2008) Admixture determines genetic diversity and population differentiation in the biological invasion of a lizard species. Biol Lett 4:434–437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Krauss J, Schmitt T, Seitz A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of the monophagous butterfly Polyommatus coridon along its northern range margin. Mol Ecol 13:311–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kronforst MR, Gilbert LE (2008) The population genetics of mimetic diversity in Heliconius butterflies. Proc R Soc B 275:493–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lanteri AA (1992) Systematics cladistics and biogeography of a new weevil genus Galapaganus (Coleoptera Curculionidae) from the Galápagos islands and coasts of Ecuador and Perú. Trans Am Entomol Soc (Phila) 118:227–267Google Scholar
  50. Macfarland C (1991) Goats on Alcedo Volcano in the Galápagos Islands—help needed. Conserv Biol 5:6–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marschalek DA, Berres ME (2014) Genetic population structure of the blister beetle, Gnathium minimum: core and peripheral populations. J Hered 105:784–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mills LS, Smouse PE (1994) Demographic consequences of inbreeding in remnant populations. Am Nat 144:412–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mok HF, Stepien CC, Kaczmarek M, Albelo LR, Sequeira AS (2014) Genetic status and timing of a weevil introduction to Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos. J Hered 105:365–380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Nielsen LR (2004) Molecular differentiation within and among island populations of the endemic plant Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from the Galápagos Islands. Heredity 93:434–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Parent CE, Crespi BJ (2009) Ecological opportunity in adaptive radiation of Galápagos endemic land snails. Am Nat 174:898–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Peck SB (1996) Origin and development of an insect fauna on a remote archipelago: the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. In: Keast A, Miller SE (eds) The origin and evolution of Pacific Island biotas, New Guinea to eastern Polynesia: patterns and processes, pp 91–122Google Scholar
  57. Peck SB (2006) The beetles of the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador: evolution, ecology, and diversity (Insecta: Coleoptera). NRC Research Press, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  58. Peck SB, Kukalovapeck J (1990) Origin and biogeography of the beetles (Coleoptera) of the Galapagos Archipelago, Ecuador. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool 68:1617–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peery MZ, Gutierrez RJ, Kirby R, Ledee OE, Lahaye W (2012a) Climate change and spotted owls: potentially contrasting responses in the Southwestern United States. Glob Change Biol 18:865–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peery MZ, Kirby R, Reid BN, Stoelting R, Doucet-Beer E, Robinson S, Vasquez-Carrillo C, Pauli JN, Palsboll PJ (2012b) Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol Ecol 21:3403–3418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ (2014) Tracer v1.6. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
  62. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1 2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  63. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roman J (2006) Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader’s range. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:2453–2459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sato A, Tichy H, O’Huigin C, Grant PR, Grant BR, Klein J (2001) On the origin of Darwin’s finches. Mol Biol Evol 18:299–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Schofield EK (1989) Effects of introduced plants and animals on island vegetation: examples from the Galapagos Archipelago. Conserv Biol 3:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sebbenn AM, Carvalho ACM, Freitas MLM, Moraes SMB, Gaino A, da Silva JM, Jolivet C, Moraes MLT (2010) Low levels of realized seed and pollen gene flow and strong spatial genetic structure in a small, isolated and fragmented population of the tropical tree Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. Heredity 106:134–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Sequeira AS, Lanteri AA, Roque Albelo L, Bhattacharya S, Sijapati M (2008a) Colonization history, ecological shifts and diversification in the evolution of endemic Galápagos weevils. Mol Ecol 17:1089–1107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Sequeira AS, Sijapati M, Lanteri AA, Roque Albelo L (2008b) Nuclear and mitochondrial sequences confirm complex colonization pattern and clear species boundaries for flightless weevils in the Galápagos archipelago. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:3439–3452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sequeira AS, Stepien CC, Sijapati M, Roque Albelo L (2012) Comparative genetic structure and demographic history in endemic Galápagos weevils. J Hered 103:206–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Shi J, Shimizu H, Zou CJ (2010) Differentiation and population subdivision in Picea mongolica based on microsatellite analyses. Biochem Syst Ecol 38:1122–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Snell HL, Tye A, Causton CE, Bensted-Smith R (2002) The status of and threats to terrestrial biodiversity. In: Bensted-Smith R (ed) A biodiversity vision for the Galápagos Islands. Charles Darwin Foundation and World Wildlife Fund, Puerto Ayora, Galápagos, EcuadorGoogle Scholar
  73. Spencer CC, Neigel JE, Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 9:1517–1528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Stacey PB, Taper M (1992) Environmental variation and the persistence of small populations. Ecol Appl 2:18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stepien CC, Kaczmarek M, Mok H, Stuckert A, Chen P, Downer SJ, Sequeira AS (2010) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci for the introduced broad-nosed weevil Galapaganus howdenae howdenae in the Galapágos archipelago. Mol Ecol Resour 10:576–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Templeton AR, Shaw K, Routman E, Davis SK (1990) The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 77:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tilman D, Dodd ME, Silvertown J, Poulton PR, Johnston AE, Crawley MJ (1994) The park grass experiment: Insights from the most long-term ecological study. In: Leigh RA, Johnston AE (eds) Long-term experiments in agricultural and ecological sciences, pp 287–303Google Scholar
  78. Van Dongen S, Backeljau T, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1998) Genetic population structure of the winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.) (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in a fragmented landscape. Heredity 80:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vandergast AG, Bohonak AJ, Weissman DB, Fisher RN (2007) Understanding the genetic effects of recent habitat fragmentation in the context of evolutionary history: phylogeography and landscape genetics of a southern California endemic Jerusalem cricket (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae: Stenopelmatus). Mol Ecol 16:977–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Vandewoestijne S, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2008) Positive correlation between genetic diversity and fitness in a large, well-connected metapopulation. BMC Biol 6(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA, Esker TL, Jansen RW, Walk JW, Kershner EL, Bouzat JL, Paige KN (1998) Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science (Wash DC) 282:1695–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Young AG, Clark GM (2000) Genetics, demography, and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol 11:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Zannese A, Morellet N, Targhetta C, Coulon A, Fuser S, Hewison AJM, Ramanzin M (2006) Spatial structure of roe deer populations: towards defining management units at a landscape scale. J Appl Ecol 43:1087–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWellesley CollegeWellesleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Terrestrial InvertebratesCharles Darwin Research StationPuerto AyoraEcuador
  3. 3.Graduate Program, Committee on Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Invertebrate Science Team, Ecologia Environment, Australia and Curtin Institute for Biodiversity and ClimateCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations