Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 69–76 | Cite as

The genetic consequences of rarity in the western prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara)

  • Andrew A. Ross
  • Steven E. TraversEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Habitat loss is a major driver of species extinction globally. The tallgrass prairie habitat of the Western Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera praeclara) has been almost entirely converted to cropland; greatly reducing and fragmenting P. praeclara populations. As a result P. praeclara now occurs in small populations that are often separated by tens of kilometers, that may be vulnerable to genetic isolation, loss of genetic diversity and inbreeding. To investigate the genetic diversity and genetic isolation of P. praeclara we used six microsatellite loci in eight populations located in Minnesota and North Dakota. Evidence of genetic divergence among the populations was found; the overall GST was 0.081. A Principal component analysis of six of the populations showed two centrally located populations were more divergent from each other than the other populations. Two populations located a greater distance from each other than to other populations were the most genetically similar. A structure analysis showed an optimal K of 5 populations, with the two central populations genetically distinct from each other and all other populations. Significant inbreeding was shown to occur in these populations. The average FI S value (0.230) indicated a level of inbreeding comparable with other self-compatible plants. The populations of P. praeclara are not significantly isolated but may suffer inbreeding depression as a result of small population size.

Keywords

Microsatellites Fragmented habitat Inbreeding Orchids Platantherapraeclara Population genetics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Nature Conservancy, Adriane Cooper, Marion Harris, Kirk Anderson, Nancy Sather, Laura Aldrich-Wolfe and Phil Delphy for their assistance. Funding was provided by The San Diego Orchid Society and the National Science Foundation (EPSCoR): Grant EPS0814442 to NDSU.

References

  1. Ægisdóttir H, Kuss P, Stöcklin J (2009) Isolated populations of a rare alpine plant show high genetic diversity and considerable population differentiation. Ann Bot 104:1313–1322PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander BW (2006) An analysis of seed production, viability, germination in situ, and grazing impacts on the western prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara, Sheviak and Bowles). Doctoral Dissertation, North Dakota State University, Fargo, NDGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander BW, Kirby D, Biondini M, Dekeyser E (2010) Cattle grazing reduces survival and reproduction of the western prairie fringed orchid. Prairie Nat 42:46–49Google Scholar
  4. Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 199–204Google Scholar
  5. Arditti J, Ghani AKA (2000) Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytol 145:367–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avise JC (2004) Molecular markers natural history and evolution, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 257–259Google Scholar
  7. Duffy KJ, Johnson SD (2014) Male interference with pollination efficiency in a hermaphroditic orchid. J Evol Biol 27:1751–1756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2011) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 Google Scholar
  9. Environment Canada (2006) Recovery strategy for the western prairie fringed-orchid (Platanthera praeclara) in Canada, vol 22, Species at risk act recovery strategy series. Environment Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  10. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan Q, Chen S, Zhou R, Xiang X, Liao W, Shi S (2011) Genetic variation of wild litchi (Litchi chinensis sonn. subsp. chinensis) revealed by microsatellites. Conserv Genet 12:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox K, Vitt P, Anderson K, Fauske G, Travers S, Vik D, Harris MO (2013) Pollination of a threatened orchid by an introduced hawkmoth species in the tallgrass prairie of North America. Biol Conserv 167:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-Statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  15. Hodges SA (1995) The influence if nectar production on hawkmoth behavior, self pollination, and seed production in Mirabilis multiflora (Nyctaginaceae). Am J Bot 82:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Vandepitte K, Honnay O, Roldán-Ruiz I, Weigand T (2007) A spatially explicit analysis of seedling recruitment in the terrestrial orchid Orchis purpurea. New Phytol 176:448–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jersáková J, Malinová T (2007) Spatial aspects of seed dispersal and seedling recruitment in orchids. New Phytol 176:237–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson SD, Torninger E, Agren J (2009) Relationships between population size and pollen fates in a moth-pollinated orchid. Biol Lett 5:282–285PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kettle CJ, Hollingsworth PM, Jaffre´ T, Moran B, Ennos RA (2007) Identifying the early genetic consequences of habitat degradation in a highly threatened tropical conifer, Araucaria nemorosa Laubenfels. Mol Ecol 16:3581–3591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kropf M, Renner SS (2008) Pollinator-mediated selfing in two deceptive orchids and a review of pollinium tracking studies addressing geitonogamy. Oecologia 155:497–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kull T (1988) Identification of clones in Cypripedium calceolus (Orchidaceae). Proc Estonian Acad Sci Biol 37:195–199Google Scholar
  22. Kull T (1999) Cypripedium calceolus L. J Ecol 87:913–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Anthony JM, Bohman B, Dixon KW, Peakall R (2015) Ecological and genetic evidence for cryptic ecotypes in a rare sexually deceptive orchid, Drakaea elastica. Bot J Linn Soc 177:124–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michalski SG, Durka W (2007) High selfing and high inbreeding depression in peripheral populations of Juncus atratus. Mol Ecol 16:4715–4727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murren CJ, Ellison AM (1998) Seed dispersal characteristics of Brassavola nodosa (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 85:675–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:3321–3323PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsson LA, Rabakonandrianina E, Pettersson B (1992) Exact tracking of pollen transfer and mating in plants. Nature 360:666–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oetting WS, Lee HK, Flanders DJ, Wiesner GL, Sellers TA, King RA (1995) Linkage analysis with multiplexed short tandem repeat polymorphisms using infrared fluorescence and M13 tailed primers. Genomics 30:450–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oosterhout CV, Hutchinson WF, Derek PW, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Res 4:535–538Google Scholar
  30. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips RD, Dixon KW, Peakall R (2012) Low population genetic differentiation in the Orchidaceae: implications for selection driven diversification of orchids. Mol Ecol 21:5208–5220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pleasants JM, Klier K (1995) Genetic variation within and among populations of eastern and western prairie fringed orchids, Platanthera leucophaea and P. praeclara. Report to the Iowa DNRGoogle Scholar
  33. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Rasmussen HN (1995) Terrestrial orchids—from seed to mycothropic plant. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  36. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts DL (2003) Pollination biology: the role of sexual reproduction in orchid conservation. In: Dixon KW, Kell SP, Barrett RL, Cribb PJ (eds) orchid conservation. Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, pp 113–136Google Scholar
  38. Ross AA, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Lance S, Glenn T, Travers S (2013) Microsatellite markers in the western prairie fringed orchid Platanthera praeclara (Orchidaceae). Appl Plant Sci 1(4). doi: 10.3732/apps.1200413
  39. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP′007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Res 8:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Setsuko S, Ishida K, Ueno S, Tsumura Y, Tomaru N (2007) Population differentiation and gene flow within a metapopulation of a threatened tree, Magnolia stellata (Magnoliaceae). Am J Bot 94:128–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharma J (2002) Mycobionts, germination and conservation genetics of federally threatened Platanthera praeclara (Orchidaceae). PhD. Dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MOGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharma J, Zettler LW, Van Sambeek JW, Ellersieck MR, Starbuck CJ (2003) Symbiotic seed germination and mycorrhizae of federally threatened Platanthera praeclara (Orchidaceae). Am Mid Nat 149:104–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sieg CH (1992) Five years following the western prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara) on the Sheyenne National Grassland, North Dakota. In: Proceedings of the North American Prairie Conference, Department of Parks and Recreation, Windsor, Canada, pp 141–146Google Scholar
  44. Soulé ME (1986) Conservation biology, the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 19–34Google Scholar
  45. Swarts ND, Sinclair EA, Krauss SL, Dixon KW (2009) Genetic diversity in fragmented populations of the critically endangered spider orchid Caladenia huegelii: implications for conservation. Conserv Genet 10:1199–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trapnell DW, Hamrick JL, Nason JD (2004) Three-dimensional fine-scale genetic structure of the neotropical epiphytic orchid, Laelia rubescens. Mol Ecol 13:1111–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuttle JP (2007) The Hawkmoths of North America. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington DC, p 21Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service (1989) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of threatened status for Platanthera leucophaea (eastern prairie fringed orchid) and Platanthera praeclara (western prairie fringed orchid). Fed Reg 54:39857–39862Google Scholar
  49. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1996) Platanthera praeclara (western prairie fringed orchid) recovery plan. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ft. Snelling Google Scholar
  50. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2009) Western Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera praeclara) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation, Bloomington, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  51. Wallace LE (2003) The cost of inbreeding in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 90:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418Google Scholar
  53. Zimmerman M (1988) Nectar production, flower phenology, and strategies for pollination. In: Doust JL, Doust LD (eds) Plant reproductive ecology patterns and strategies, 5th edn. Oxfor University Press, New York, pp 157–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological Sciences, Dept. 2715North Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  2. 2.Plant Sciences, Dept. 7670North Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations