Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 853–868 | Cite as

Population genetics of Formica aquilonia wood ants in Scotland: the effects of long-term forest fragmentation and recent reforestation

  • Tytti Vanhala
  • Kevin Watts
  • Stuart A’Hara
  • Joan CottrellEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Formica aquilonia wood ants are forest specialists which play a key role in the ecology of forests in Europe. Many of the Scottish populations at the edge of the species distribution range occur in highly fragmented landscapes. We used ten microsatellite loci to study the genetic diversity and structure of populations from two contrasting regions (Inverpolly and the Trossachs) to set the Scottish populations in the context of conspecific populations in mainland Europe. Historically, both study regions have experienced extreme habitat loss and fragmentation over several centuries. Inverpolly has remained fragmented whereas large scale reforestation over the last century has greatly increased the forested area in the Trossachs. Despite the long history of fragmentation, genetic diversity in the Scottish populations was greater than in the populations in mainland Europe. Genetic diversity was similar in the two Scottish regions and no evidence of inbreeding was detected. However, the populations in Inverpolly showed more evidence of genetic bottlenecks, possibly due to more frequent stochastic events such as moorland fires. The ant populations in individual forests were genetically distinct and we detected no contemporary gene flow between forests. The most intensively studied forest where non-native conifer plantations now occupy the matrix between the remaining ancient woodland fragments showed evidence that admixture and gene flow between nests was reducing the past differentiation. This may reflect a dynamic response to the reconnection of previously isolated populations in forest fragments by recent reforestation.

Keywords

Fragmentation Reforestation Gene flow Genetic diversity Relatedness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jonathan Hughes at Scottish Wildlife Trust for early discussions and advice on site selection and Alice Broome at Forest Research for advice on wood ant ecology. We thank David Anderson for assisting us to locate nests in the Trossachs. We are also indebted to the two anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments and advice. The study was financed by the Forestry Commission.

Supplementary material

10592_2014_584_MOESM1_ESM.doc (509 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 509 kb)
10592_2014_584_MOESM2_ESM.doc (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 1,393 kb)

References

  1. Anon (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/
  2. Ashmole P (2011) Grass roots contributions to woodland restoration in the Scottish uplands. In: Marrs SJ, Foster S, Hendrie C, Mackey EC, Thompson DBA (eds) The changing nature of Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage, The Stationary Office, Edinburgh, pp 355–372Google Scholar
  3. Chapman RE, Bourke AFG (2001) The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects. Ecol Lett 4:650–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapuisat M (1996) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Formica lugubris B and their variability in other ant species. Mol Ecol 5:599–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567–1587PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7(4):574–578PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortelius W (2005) Mating behaviour in the polygynous/polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ann Zool Fenn 42:213–224Google Scholar
  12. Genovart M, Thibault J-C, Igual J-M, Bauzà-Ribot M, Rabouam C, Bretagnolle V (2013) Population structure and dispersal patterns within and between Atlantic and Mediterranean populations of a large-range pelagic seabird. PLoS One 8:e70711PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilchrist AS, Meats AW (2010) The genetic structure of populationsof an invading pest fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, at the species climatic range. Heredity 105:165–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaubitz JC (2004) CONVERT: a user friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol Ecol Notes 4:309–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate Fstatistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  16. Goudet J (2005) HIERFSTAT, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gyllenstrand N, Seppa P (2003) Conservation genetics of the wood ant, Formica lugubris, in a fragmented landscape. Mol Ecol 12:2931–2940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gyllenstrand N, Gertsch PJ, Pamilo P (2002) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the ant Formica exsecta. Mol Ecol Notes 2:67–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Mol Ecol 14:599–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holzer B, Chapuisat M, Kremer N, Finet C, Keller L (2006) Unicoloniality, recognition and genetic differentiation in a native Formica ant. J Evol Biol 19:2031–2039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holzer B, Keller L, Chapuisat M (2009) Genetic clusters and sex biased geneflow in a unicolonial Formica ant. BMC Evol Biol 9:69–80PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes J (2006) A review of wood ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) in Scotland. Scottish natural heritage commissioned report No 178 (ROAME No F04AC319), pp 1–29Google Scholar
  24. Hughes J, Broome A (2007) Forests and wood ants in Scotland. Forestry commission information note 90. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones OR, Wang J (2010) COLONY:a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 10:551–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biodivers 16:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macdonald M (2013) Highland ants: distribution, ecology and conservation. E-book. Highland Biological Recording Group, Inverness, p 64. http://www.hbrg.org.uk/Atlases.html
  28. Mäki-Petäys H, Breen J (2007) Genetic vulnerability of a remnant ant population. Conserv Genet 8:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mäki-Petäys H, Zakharov A, Viljakainen L, Corander J, Pamilo P (2005) Genetic changes associated to declining populations of Formica ants in fragmented forest landscape. Mol Ecol 14:733–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McIntosh B (2011) The extent, nature and distribution of Scotland’s woodlands. In: Marrs SJ, Foster S, Hendrie C, Mackey EC, Thompson DBA (eds) The changing nature of Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage, The Stationary Office, Edinburgh, pp 327–340Google Scholar
  31. Nagamitsu T, Yamagishi H (2009) Nest density, genetic structure, and triploid workers in exotic Bombus terrestris populations colonized Japan. Apidologie 40:429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1997) Population biology of social insect conservation. Mem Mus Vic 56:411–419Google Scholar
  33. Pamilo P, Zhu D, Fortelius W, Rosengren R, Seppa P, Sundström L (2005) Genetic patchwork of network-building wood ant populations. Ann Zool Fenn 42:179–187Google Scholar
  34. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Punttila P (1996) Succession, forest fragmentation and the distribution of wood ants. Oikos 75:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosengren R, Pamilo P (1983) The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound-building Formica ants. Acta Entomol Fenn 42:65–77Google Scholar
  38. Rosengren R, Sundström L, Fortelius W (1993) Monogyny and polygyny of Formica ants—a result of alternative dispersal tactics? In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 308–333Google Scholar
  39. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ‘ 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seppä P, Sundsröm L, Punttila P (1995) Facultative polygony and habitat succession in boreal ants. Biol J Linn Soc 4:533–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sorvari J, Hakkarainen H (2005) Deforestation reduces nest mound size and decreases the production of sexual offspring in the wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ann Zool Fenn 42:259–267Google Scholar
  42. Sorvari J, Hakkarainen H (2007a) The role of food and colony size in sexual offspring production in a social insect: an experiment. Ecol Entomol 32:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sorvari J, Hakkarainen H (2007b) Wood ants are wood ants: deforestation causes population declines in the polydomous wood ant Formica aquilonia. Ecol Entomol 32:707–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorvari J, Theodora P, Turillazzi S, Hakkarainen H, Sundstrom L (2008) Food resources, chemical signalling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia. Behav Ecol 19:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP (2010) Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol Ecol 19:3496–3514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sundström L, Seppä P, Pamilo P (2005) Genetic population structure and dispersal patterns in Formica ants—a review. Ann Zool Fenn 42:163–177Google Scholar
  47. Sunnucks P, Hales DF (1996) Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: aphididae). Mol Biol Evol 13:510–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2008) ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:2498–2504PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang J (2007) Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet Res 89:135–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang J (2009) A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes. Mol Ecol 18:2148–2164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang J (2011) COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol Ecol Resour 11:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright as represented by the Forest Research 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tytti Vanhala
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kevin Watts
    • 2
  • Stuart A’Hara
    • 3
  • Joan Cottrell
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.VanhalytixKnivstaSweden
  2. 2.Forest Research, Alice HoltEnglandUK
  3. 3.Forest Research, Northern Research StationScotlandUK

Personalised recommendations