Conservation Genetics

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1231–1245 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal variation in genetic diversity of an endangered freshwater seal

  • Mia Valtonen
  • Jukka U. Palo
  • Minna Ruokonen
  • Mervi Kunnasranta
  • Tommi Nyman
Research Article

Abstract

Molecular-genetic assessments of demographic history, population structure, and loss of genetic variation in small natural populations are often hampered by a lack of information on initial diversity, isolation time, and migration rates. The landlocked population of currently less than 300 ringed seals inhabiting Lake Saimaa in southeastern Finland offers a unique model for studying these questions in small populations. It has remained completely isolated since the last ice age, information on its initial genetic diversity can be inferred from the large marine source population in the Baltic Sea, and its ecology is well studied. We analyzed the mitochondrial DNA diversity of 215 Saimaa ringed seals spanning three decades in order to assess long- and short-term changes in the gene pool of this critically endangered subspecies. The mtDNA diversity of the Saimaa ringed seal is low, consisting of only eight haplotypes. Nevertheless, coalescent simulations show that the diversity is unexpectedly high when contrasted with the over 800 generations of isolation and the estimated historical carrying capacity of the lake. In the short term, marked temporal and spatial differentiation was observed among three decades and four regions of Lake Saimaa, suggesting extremely low effective subpopulation sizes and limited migration of females within the lake. Our study strongly suggests that enhancing gene flow and population growth is crucial for maintaining the remaining genetic diversity of the Saimaa ringed seal.

Keywords

Genetic drift MtDNA Small population Spatio-temporal differentiation Coalescent simulation Saimaa ringed seal 

Supplementary material

10592_2012_367_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (782 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 781 kb)

References

  1. Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Gulland F, Greig D, Amos W (2003) Inbreeding: disease susceptibility in California sea lions. Nature 422:35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen LW, Lydersen C, Frie AK, Rosing-Asvid A, Hauksson E, Kovacs KM (2011) A population on the edge: genetic diversity and population structure of the world’s northernmost harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Biol J Linn Soc 102:420–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson CNK, Ramakrishnan U, Chan YL, Hadly EA (2005) Serial SimCoal: a population genetic model for data from multiple populations and points in time. Bioinformatics 21:1733–1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Árnason Ú, Johnsson E (1992) The complete mitochondrial sequence of the harbor seal, Phoca vitulina. J Mol Evol 34:493–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babik W, Pabijan M, Arntzen J, Cogalniceanu D, Durka W, Radwan J (2009) Long-term survival of a urodele amphibian despite depleted major histocompatibility complex variation. Mol Ecol 18:769–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blomqvist D, Pauliny A, Larsson M, Flodin L-Å (2010) Trapped in the extinction vortex? Strong genetic effects in a declining vertebrate population. BMC Evol Biol 10:33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bollmer JL, Vargas H, Parker PG (2007) Low MHC variation in the endangered Galápagos penguin (Sphenicus mendiculus). Immunogenetics 59:593–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calendini F, Martin JF (2005) PaupUP v1.0.3.1: a free graphical frontend for Paup* DOS software. http://www.agro-montpellier.fr/sppe/Recherche/JFM/PaupUp/main.htm. Accessed 20 April 2012
  10. Campbell RA, Gales NJ, Lento GM, Baker CS (2008) Islands in the sea: extreme female natal site fidelity in the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea. Biol Lett 4:139–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castelloe J, Templeton AR (1994) Root probabilities for intraspecific gene trees under neutral coalescent theory. Mol Phylogenet Evol 3:102–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cristescu R, Cahill V, Sherwin WB, Handasyde K, Carlyon K, Whisson D, Herbert CA, Carlsson BLJ, Wilton AN, Cooper DW (2009) Inbreeding and testicular abnormalities in a bottlenecked population of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Wildl Res 36:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donner J (1995) The quaternary history of Scandinavia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehlers A, Worm B, Reusch TBH (2008) Importance of genetic diversity in eelgrass Zostera marina for its resilience to global warming. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 355:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: applications to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Excoffier L, Novembre J, Schneider S (2000) SIMCOAL: a general coalescent program for simulation of molecular data in interconnected populations with arbitrary demography. J Hered 91:506–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  19. Forstén A, Alhonen P (1975) The subfossil seals of Finland and their relationship to the history of the Baltic Sea. Boreas 4:10–22Google Scholar
  20. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guschanski K, Olivieri G, Funk SM, Radespiel U (2007) MtDNA reveals strong genetic differentiation among geographically isolated populations of the golden brown mouse lemur, Microcebus ravelobensis. Conserv Genet 8:809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habel JC, Finger A, Meyer M, Louy D, Zachos F, Assmann T, Schmitt T (2009) Unprecedented long-term genetic monomorphism in an endangered relict butterfly species. Conserv Genet 10:1659–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harkonen T, Jüssi M, Jüssi I, Verevkin M, Dmitrieva L, Helle E, Sagitov R, Harding KC (2008) Seasonal activity budget of adult Baltic ringed seals. PLoS ONE 3:e2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985) Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heath DD, Busch C, Kelly J, Atagi DY (2002) Temporal change in genetic structure and effective population size in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol Ecol 11:197–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hey J (2010) Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol Biol Evol 27:905–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoeck PEA, Bollmer JL, Parker PG, Keller LF (2010) Differentiation with drift: a spatio-temporal genetic analysis of Galápagos mockingbird populations (Mimus spp.). Phil Trans R Soc B 365:1127–1138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoelzel AR, Natoli A, Dahlheim ME, Olavarria C, Baird RW, Black NA (2002) Low worldwide genetic diversity in the killer whale (Orcinus orca): implications for demographic history. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1467–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hürner H, Krystufek B, Sarà M, Ribas A, Ruch T, Sommer R, Ivashkina V, Michaux JR (2010) Mitochondrial phylogeography of the edible dormouse (Glis glis) in the western Palearctic region. J Mammal 91:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hyvärinen H, Nieminen M (1990) Differentiation of the ringed seal in the Baltic Sea, Lake Ladoga and Lake Saimaa. Finn Game Res 47:21–27Google Scholar
  32. Hyvärinen H, Sipilä T, Kunnasranta M, Koskela J (1998) Mercury pollution and the Saimaa ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis). Mar Pollut Bull 36:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyvärinen H, Sipilä T, Koskela J, Kunnasranta M (1999) The Saimaa ringed seal. In: Kuusisto E (ed) Saimaa, a living lake. Tammi, Helsinki, pp 126–136Google Scholar
  34. Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kokko H, Lindström J, Ranta E, Sipilä T, Koskela J (1998) Estimating the demographic effective population size of the Saimaa ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis Nordq.). Anim Conserv 1:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kokko H, Helle E, Lindstöm J, Ranta E, Sipilä T, Courchamp F (1999) Backcasting population sizes of ringed and grey seals in the Baltic and Lake Saimaa during the 20th century. Ann Zool Fenn 36:65–73Google Scholar
  38. Kontula T, Väinölä R (2001) Postglacial colonization of northern Europe by distinct phylogeographic lineages of the bullhead, Cottus gobio. Mol Ecol 10:1983–2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koskela JT, Kunnasranta M, Hämäläinen E, Hyvärinen H (2002) Movements and use of haul-out sites of radiotagged Saimaa ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis). Ann Zool Fenn 39:59–67Google Scholar
  40. Koskinen MT, Ranta E, Piironen J, Veselov A, Titov S, Haugen TO, Nilsson J, Carlstein M, Primmer CR (2000) Genetic lineages and postglacial colonization of grayling (Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae) in Europe, as revealed by mitochondrial DNA analyses. Mol Ecol 9:1609–1624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kovacs KM, Aguilar A, Aurioles D, Burkanov V, Campagna C, Gales N, Gelatt T, Goldsworthy SD, Goodman SJ, Hofmeyr GJG, Härkönen T, Lowry L, Lydersen C, Schipper J, Sipilä T, Southwell C, Stuart S, Thompson D, Trillmich F (2012) Global threats to pinnipeds. Mar Mammal Sci 28:414–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kunnasranta M (2001) Behavioural biology of two ringed seal (Phoca hispida) subspecies in the large European lakes Saimaa and Ladoga. PhD Thesis, University of Joensuu, Joensuu, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  43. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lei R, Hu Z, Jiang Z, Yang W (2003) Phylogeography and genetic diversity of the critically endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. Anim Conserv 6:361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liao W, Reed DH (2009) Inbreeding–environment interactions increase extinction risk. Anim Conserv 12:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lowther AD, Harcourt RG, Goldsworthy SD, Stow A (2012) Population structure of adult female Australian sea lions is driven by fine-scale foraging site fidelity. Anim Behav 83:691–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Madsen T, Stille B, Shine R (1996) Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus. Biol Conserv 75:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martínez-Cruz B, Godoy JA, Negro JJ (2007) Population fragmentation leads to spatial and temporal genetic structure in the endangered Spanish imperial eagle. Mol Ecol 16:477–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Metsähallitus, Natural Heritage Services (2012) Hyljekanta 2011 (seal population 2011, in Finnish). http://www.metsa.fi/sivustot/metsa/fi/Luonnonsuojelu/Lajitjaluontotyypit/Uhanalaisetelaimet/Saimaannorppa/Hyljekanta2011/Sivut/Hyljekanta2011.aspx. Accessed 24 Jan 2012
  50. Niemi M, Auttila M, Viljanen M, Kunnasranta M (2011) Home range, survival and dispersal of endangered Saimaa ringed seal pups: implications for conservation. Mar Mammal Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00521.x. Accessed 20 April 2012
  51. Nieminen M, Singer MC, Fortelius W, Schöps K, Hanski I (2001) Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. Am Nat 157:237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nilsson J, Gross R, Asplund T, Dove O, Jansson H, Kellonieni J, Kohlmann K, Löytynoja A, Nielsen EE, Paaver T, Primmer CR, Titov S, Vasemägi A, Veselov A, Öst T, Lumme J (2001) Matrilinear phylogeography of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in Europe and postglacial colonization of the Baltic Sea area. Mol Ecol 10:89–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Corry-Crowe G (2008) Climate change and the molecular ecology of Arctic marine mammals. Ecol Appl 18:S56–S76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkey DW, Frankham R (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affects extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv 133:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ortego J, Yannic G, Shafer ABA, Mainguy J, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW, Côté SD (2011) Temporal dynamics of genetic variability in a mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) population. Mol Ecol 20:1601–1611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Palo J (2003) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of landlocked seals. PhD Thesis. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  57. Palo JU, Mäkinen HS, Helle E, Stenman O, Väinölä R (2001) Microsatellite variation in ringed seals (Phoca hispida): genetic structure and history of the Baltic Sea population. Heredity 86:609–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Palo JU, Hyvärinen H, Helle E, Mäkinen HS, Väinölä R (2003) Postglacial loss of microsatellite variation in the landlocked Lake Saimaa ringed seal. Conserv Genet 4:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palstra FP, Ruzzante DE (2008) Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence? Mol Ecol 17:3428–3447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pesole G, Gissi C, De Chirico A, Saccone C (1999) Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol 48:427–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pichler FB, Baker CS (2000) Loss of genetic diversity in the endemic Hector’s dolphin due to fisheries-related mortality. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polzin T, Daneshmand SV (2003) On Steiner trees and minimum spanning trees in hypergraphs. Oper Res Lett 31:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM (2000) Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1947–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Randi E, Lucchini V, Christensen MF, Mucci N, Funk SM, Dolf G, Loeschcke V (2000) Mitochondrial DNA variability in Italian and East European wolves: detecting the consequences of small population size and hybridization. Conserv Biol 14:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ranta E, Lindström J, Kokko H (1996) Ecological risk analysis: the case of the Saimaa ringed seal. Ambio 25:363–365Google Scholar
  67. Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (2010) The 2010 red list of Finnish species. Ministry of the Environment and Finnish Environment Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  68. Reed DH (2010) Albatrosses, eagles and newts, Oh My!: exceptions to the prevailing paradigm concerning genetic diversity and population viability? Anim Conserv 13:448–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reeves RR (1998) Distribution, abundance and biology of ringed seals (Phoca hispida): an overview. In: Heide-Jørgensen MP, Lydersen C (eds) Ringed Seals in the North Atlantic. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO) Scientific Publications 1, Tromsø, Norway, pp 9–45Google Scholar
  70. Riccioni G, Landi M, Ferrara G, Milano I, Cariani A, Zane L, Sella M, Barbujani G, Tinti F (2010) Spatio-temporal population structuring and genetic diversity retention in depleted Atlantic Bluefin tuna of the Mediterranean Sea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:2102–2107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruokonen M, Aarvak T, Chesser RK, Lundqvist A-C, Merilä J (2010) Temporal increase in mtDNA diversity in a declining population. Mol Ecol 19:2408–2417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Saarnisto M (2011) Challenging the early Holocene isolation dating of the Saimaa and Ladoga ringed seals. In: Harjula J, Helamaa M, Haarala J (eds) Times, things and places: 36 essays for Jussi-Pekka Taavitsainen. J.-P. Taavitsainen Festschrift Committee, Turku and Helsinki, Finland, pp 28–39Google Scholar
  74. Saarnisto M, Grönlund T, Ekman I (1995) Lateglacial of Lake Onega – contribution to the history of the eastern Baltic basin. Quat Int 27:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Saarnisto M, Simola H, Kuusisto E (1999) Prehistory. In: Kuusisto E (ed) Saimaa, a living lake. Tammi, Helsinki, pp 11–20Google Scholar
  76. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schultz JK, Baker JD, Toonen RJ, Bowen BW (2009) Extremely low genetic diversity in the endangered Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi). J Hered 100:25–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sipilä T (1990) Lair structure and breeding habitat of the Saimaa ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis Nordq.) in Finland. Finn Game Res 47:11–20Google Scholar
  79. Sipilä T, Helle E, Hyvärinen H (1990) Distribution, population size and reproductivity of the Saimaa ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis Nordq.) in Finland, 1980–1984. Finn Game Res 47:3–10Google Scholar
  80. Sipilä T, Medvedev N, Hyvärinen H (1996) The Ladoga seal (Phoca hispida ladogensis Nordq.). Hydrobiologia 322:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Slade RW, Moritz C, Hoelzel AR, Burton HR (1998) Molecular population genetics of the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Genetics 149:1945–1957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith TG (1973) Population dynamics of the ringed seal in the Canadian Eastern Arctic. Bull Fish Res Board Can 181:1–55Google Scholar
  83. Smith S, Belov K, Hughes J (2010) MHC screening for marsupial conservation: extremely low levels of class II diversity indicate population vulnerability for an endangered Australian marsupial. Conserv Genet 11:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith BT, Escalante P, Hernandez Banos B, Navarro-Siguenza A, Rohwer S, Klicka J (2011) The role of historical and contemporary processes on phylogeographic structure and genetic diversity in the northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). BMC Evol Biol 11:136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stewart BS, Yochem PK, Huber HR, DeLong RL, Jameson RJ, Sydeman WJ, Allen SG, Le Boeuf BJ (1994) History and present status of the northern elephant seal population. In: Le Boeuf BJ, Laws RM (eds) Elephant seals: population ecology, behavior and physiology. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 29–48Google Scholar
  86. Stewart REA, Stewart BE, Stirling I, Street E (1996) Counts of growth layer groups in cementum and dentine in ringed seals (Phoca hispida). Mar Mammal Sci 12:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Swofford DL (2000) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  88. Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evolution 64:1202–1217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Tikkanen M (2002) Long-term changes in lake and river systems in Finland. Fennia 180:31–42Google Scholar
  91. Ukkonen P (2002) The early history of seals in the northern Baltic. Ann Zool Fenn 39:187–207Google Scholar
  92. Visscher PM, Smith D, Hall SJG, Williams JL (2001) A viable herd of genetically uniform cattle. Nature 409:303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Weber DS, Stewart BS, Garza JC, Lehman N (2000) An empirical genetic assessment of the severity of the northern elephant seal population bottleneck. Curr Biol 10:1287–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zachos FE, Althoff C, Steynitz YV, Eckert I, Hartl GB (2007) Genetic analysis of an isolated red deer (Cervus elaphus) population showing signs of inbreeding depression. Eur J Wildl Res 53:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Valtonen
    • 1
  • Jukka U. Palo
    • 2
  • Minna Ruokonen
    • 3
  • Mervi Kunnasranta
    • 1
    • 4
  • Tommi Nyman
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
  2. 2.Hjelt Institute, Department of Forensic MedicineUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  4. 4.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research InstituteTurkuFinland
  5. 5.Institute of Systematic BotanyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations