Conservation Genetics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 373–380 | Cite as

Species designation of the Bruneau Dune tiger beetle (Cicindela waynei) is supported by phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequence data

  • Caren S. Goldberg
  • David C. Tank
  • Simon Uribe-Convers
  • William R. Bosworth
  • Hannah E. Marx
  • Lisette P. Waits
Research Article

Abstract

Beetles comprise nearly one quarter of described species and show high levels of morphological and ecological diversification. Because of their wide distribution, ease of detection, and correlation of species richness patterns with other taxa, tiger beetles have been recommended for use as a global indicator of regional biodiversity, requiring accurate taxonomic designations. The Bruneau Dune tiger beetle (Cicindela waynei), whose habitat consists of an isolated dune field in southern Idaho, was recently described as a distinct species from the St. Anthony Dunes tiger beetle (C. arenicola) based on morphological characteristics. While these characteristics include distinct differences in genital morphology that could indicate intrinsic reproductive isolation, morphological characteristics have sometimes been misleading in tiger beetle taxonomy. To evaluate genetic support for this species designation, we analyzed 1,751 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA sequence from 147 tiger beetles collected throughout the range of both C. arenicola and C. waynei. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses indicated monophyly for C. waynei on a well-supported, short branch nested within C. arenicola. Bayesian species delimitation analyses strongly supported C. waynei as a distinct species (speciation probability = 1.0) with the estimated time of divergence ca. 14,500–67,000 years ago. This lack of reciprocal monophyly and recency of speciation is consistent with C. waynei as a member of an evolutionary front where speciation has occurred at a rapid rate. Mitochondrial sequence data supports the species designation of C. waynei, emphasizing the need to determine appropriate management for this species and its restricted habitat.

Keywords

Bayesian species delimitation Cicindela arenicola Cicindela waynei Mitochondrial DNA Tiger beetle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Ross Winton for sharing samples, Rob Cavallaro, Kevin Church, Suzin Romin, and Tim Weekley for assisting with field collection, and Mary Sterling for laboratory work. We also thank Dr. Ziheng Yang for suggestions regarding the species delimitation analyses with BP&P. Funding for this project was provided by U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Grant E-50-1 to the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. We thank two anonymous reviewers and Dr. Alfried Vogler for helpful comments on a previous draft of this manuscript. This is contribution 1064 of the University of Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station.

Supplementary material

10592_2011_295_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)
10592_2011_295_MOESM2_ESM.ps (696 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PS 695 kb)

References

  1. Barraclough TG, Vogler AP (2002) Recent diversification rates in North American tiger beetles estimated from a dated mtDNA phylogenetic tree. Mol Biol Evol 19:1706–1716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barraclough TG, Hogan JE, Vogler AP (1999) Testing whether ecological factors promote cladogenesis in a group of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Proc Royal Soc Lond B 266:1061–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brower AVZ (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA Evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6491–6495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busacca AJ, Begét JE, Markewich HW, Muhs DR, Lancaster N, Sweeney M (2004) Eolian sediments. In: Gillespie AR, Porter SC, Atwater BF (eds) The quaternary period in the United States. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 275–309Google Scholar
  5. Cassola F, Pearson DL (2000) Global patterns of tiger beetle species richness (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): their use in conservation planning. Biol Conserv 95:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crozier YC, Koulianos S, Crozier RH (1991) An improved test for Africanized honeybee mitochondrial DNA. Experientia 47:968–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Queiroz K (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol 56:879–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erwin TL (1991) An evolutionary basis for conservation strategies. Science 253:750–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunt T, Bergsten J, Levkanicova Z, Papadopoulou A, St. John O, Wild R, Hammond PM, Ahrens D, Balke M, Caterino MS, Gómez-Zurita J, Ribera I, Barraclough TG, Bocakova M, Bocak L, Vogler AP (2007) A comprehensive phylogeny of beetles reveals the evolutionary origins of a super radiation. Science 318:1913–1916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kimura M (1981) Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:454–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leaché AD, Fujita MK (2010) Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus). P R Soc B 277:3071–3077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leffler S (2001) A new species of tiger beetle from southwestern Idaho (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Cicindela 33:19–40Google Scholar
  13. Liebherr JK, McHugh JV (2003) Coleoptera. In: Resh VH, Cardé RT (eds) Encyclopedia of insects. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 209–229Google Scholar
  14. Logan DR (1995) Idaho dune tiger beetle survey, Cicindela arenicola Rumpp. Tech Bull 95–17, Idaho Bureau of Land Management, BoiseGoogle Scholar
  15. Malde HE (1991) Quaternary geology and structural history of the Snake River Plain, Idaho and Oregon. In: Morrison RB (ed) Quaternary nonglacial geology: conterminous U.S. The geology of North America V. K-2. Geological Society of America, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  16. Morgan M, Knisley CB, Vogler AP (2000) New taxonomic status of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela limbata albissima (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): evidence from mtDNA. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:1108–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murphy JD (1973) The geology of Eagle Cove at Bruneau, Idaho. M.S. Thesis. State University of New York at BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  18. Oviatt CG, Curry DR, Sack D (1992) Radiocarbon chronology of Lake Bonneville, Eastern Great Basin, USA. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 99:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearson DL, Cassola F (1992) World-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conserv Biol 6:376–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rambaut A (2002) Se-Al: sequence alignment editor, v2.0a11. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/. Accessed 2 May 2011
  22. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2004) Tracer. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/. Accessed 2 May 2011
  23. Rannala B, Yang Z (2003) Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645–1656Google Scholar
  24. Reed DH, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003) Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57:1822–1828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rivalier E (1954) Démembrement du genre Cicindela Linné. II. Faune americaine. Rev Franc Entomol 21:249–268Google Scholar
  26. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shimodaira H (2002) An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Sys Biol 51:492–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M (2001) CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17:1246–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shook GA, Clark WH (1988) Status of the Idaho dunes tiger beetle, Cicindela arenicola Rumpp, (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). J Idaho Acad Sci 24:38–42Google Scholar
  30. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1991) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:651–701Google Scholar
  31. Sites J Jr, Marshall J (2004) Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 35:199–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spielman D, Brook BW, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2004) Does inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity decrease disease resistance. Conserv Genet 5:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Sys Biol 57:758–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vogler AP, Welsh A (1997) Phylogeny of North American Cicindela tiger beetles inferred from multiple mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylo Evol 8:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vogler AP, DeSalle R, Assmann T, Knisley CB, Schultz TD (1993) Molecular population genetics of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:142–152Google Scholar
  37. Vogler AP, Welsh A, Barraclough TG (1998) Molecular phylogeny of the Cicindela maritima (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) group indicates fast radiation in western North America. Ann Entomol Soc Am 91:185–194Google Scholar
  38. Vogler AP, Cardoso A, Barraclough TG (2005) Exploring rate variation among and within sites in a densely sampled tree: species level phylogenetics of North American tiger beeltes (Genus Cicindela). Sys Biol 54:4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winton RC, Kippenhan MG, Ivie MA (2010) New state record for Cicindela arenicola Rumpp (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae) in southwestern Montana. Coleopt Bull 64:43–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodcock MR, Kippenhan MG, Knisley CB, Foster JA (2007) Molecular genetics of Cicindela (Cylindera) terricola and elevation of C. lunalonga to species level, with comments on its conservation status. Conserv Genet 8:865–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang Z, Rannala B (2010) Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:9264–9269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caren S. Goldberg
    • 1
  • David C. Tank
    • 2
  • Simon Uribe-Convers
    • 2
  • William R. Bosworth
    • 3
  • Hannah E. Marx
    • 2
  • Lisette P. Waits
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fish and Wildlife ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences & Stillinger HerbariumUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  3. 3.Idaho Department of Fish and GameUniversity of IdahoBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations