Conservation Genetics

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 117–130

Population genetic diversity and structure of two rare vernal pool grasses in central California

  • Sarah P. Gordon
  • Christina M. Sloop
  • Heather G. Davis
  • J. Hall Cushman
Research Article

Abstract

Vernal pool ecosystems are declining throughout California, with only 10% of historic habitat remaining. This has endangered many specialist endemic plant species, leaving extant populations fragmented, isolated, and threatened or endangered. Recovery plans for the increasing number of endangered vernal pool species require information on their genetic and ecological status to guide conservation and restoration efforts. Federally threatened Neostapfia colusana (Colusa grass) and federally endangered Tuctoria greenei (Greene’s tuctoria) are two endemic vernal pool grasses of high conservation concern in central California. Remaining populations are highly fragmented due to range-wide habitat destruction. Using five polymorphic microsatellite markers for each species, we performed genetic surveys of 240 individuals from eight vernal pools for N. colusana, and 317 individuals from 13 vernal pools for T. greenei. We detected high within-population genetic diversity for both species, with average allelic diversities of 24 alleles/locus (mean Hobs = 0.68, mean Hexp = 0.71) for N. colusana, and 19 alleles/locus (mean Hobs = 0.77, and mean Hexp = 0.79) for T. greenei. Bayesian clustering and AMOVA indicated two genetically distinct population groups for N. colusana (Fst = 0.268, P < 0.0001), and three for T. greenei (Fst = 0.11, P < 0.0001). We found very slight temporal genetic structure at one N. colusana (Fst = 0.013, P < 0.05) and two T. greenei (Fst = 0.015, Fst = 0.018, P < 0.05) pools. These estimates of population genetic diversity and structure are critical measures for both species that will help inform recovery management actions.

Keywords

Genetic structure Genetic diversity Endangered species Vernal pool grasses Habitat fragmentation Microsatellite Tuctoria sp. Neostapfia colusana 

Supplementary material

10592_2011_269_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 15 kb)
10592_2011_269_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (32 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 32 kb)
10592_2011_269_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (41 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 40 kb)
10592_2011_269_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (34 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 33 kb)
10592_2011_269_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (44 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 44 kb)
10592_2011_269_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (31 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (PDF 31 kb)

References

  1. Alexander DG, Schlising RA (1998) Patterns in time and space for rare macroinvertebrates and vascular plants in vernal pool ecosystems at the Vina plains preserve, and implications for pool landscape management. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk D, Ferren WRJ, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceedings of the 1996 conference of the California Native Plant SocietyGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin Y (1994) California’s ephemeral vernal pools may be a good model for speciation. Bioscience 44:384–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beardsmore JA (1983) Extinction, survival and genetic variation. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL (eds) Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, California, pp 125–151Google Scholar
  4. Black C, Zedler PH (1998) An overview of 15 years of vernal pool restoration and construction activities in San Diego County, California. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk D, Ferren WRJ, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceedings of the 1996 conference of the California Native Plant SocietyGoogle Scholar
  5. Boykin LM, Kubatko LS, Lowrey TK (2010) Comparison of methods for rooting phyologenetic trees: a case study using Orcuttieae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:687–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CNDDB (2006) California Natural Diversity Database, California Department of Fish and Game. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb. Accessed July 2006
  7. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis HG, Sloop CM, Cushman JH (2009) Developing tools to promote the recovery of five federally listed vernal pool grasses. Final Report. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmands S (2007) Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 16:463–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elam D (1998) Population genetics of vernal pool plants: theory data and conservation implications. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk D, Ferren WRJ, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceedings of the 1996 conference of the California Native Plant SocietyGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Estoup A, Garnery L, Solignac M, Cornuet JM (1995) Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics 140:679–695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver 3.11: an integrated software package for population genetic data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
  15. Falush D, Stephans M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7:574–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan Q, Chen S, Zhou R, Xiang X, Liao W, Shi S (2011) Genetic variation of wild litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn. subsp. chinensis) revealed by microsatellites. Conserv Genet 12:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferguson NJ, Ellstrand NC (1999) Assessment of seed bank buffering of genetic change in Dodeca hemaleptoceras (Slender-horned Spineflower). Final Report to M. Meyer. Department of Fish and Game, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferren WRJ, Hubbard DM, Wiseman S, Parikh AK, Gale N (1998) Review of 10 years of vernal pool restoration and creation in Santa Barbara, California. In: Witham CW, Bauder ET, Belk D, Ferren WRJ, Ornduff R (eds) Ecology, conservation, and management of vernal pool ecosystems. Proceedings of the 1996 conference of the California Native Plant SocietyGoogle Scholar
  20. Foin T, Reilly S, Pawley A, Ayres D, Carlson T, Hodem P, Switzer P (1998) Improving recovery planning for the conservation of threatened and endangered taxa. Bioscience 48:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv 126:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frankham R (2010) Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conserv Genet 11:661–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Brosco DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilligan DM, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2005) Comparative losses of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res 85:47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilpin ME, Soulé ME (1986) Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 19–34Google Scholar
  26. Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PE (2000) Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Am J Bot 87(6):783–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griggs FT (1981) Life histories of vernal pool annual grasses. Fremontia 9:14–17Google Scholar
  28. Griggs FT, Jain S (1983) Conservation of vernal pool plants in California, II. Population biology of a rare and unique grass genus Orcuttia. Biol Conserv 27:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobson WA, Dahlgren RA (1998) A quantitative study of pedogenesis in California vernal pool wetlands. Soil Sci Soc Am Spec Publ 54:107–127Google Scholar
  30. Holland R (1978) The geographic and edaphic distribution of vernal pools in the great central valley, California. California Native Plant Society Special Publication No. 4, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  31. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  32. Karron JD (1987) A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol Ecol 1:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keeler-Wolf T, Elam DR, Lewis K, Flint SA (1998) California vernal pool assessment preliminary report. State of California. Department of Fish and Game, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  34. Keeley JE (1998) C4 photosynthetic modifications in the evolutionary transition from land to water in aquatic grasses. Oecologia 116:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2001) Genetic data analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.1 (d16c). Free program distributed by the authors over the internet from http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis/software.php. Accessed 19 Jan 2011
  36. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin MA, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Taurchini D, Villani F (2010) Genetic diversity in European chestnut populations by means of genomic and genic microsatellite markers. Tree Genet Genomes 6:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller MP (2005) Alleles in space: computer software for the joint analysis of inter individual spatial and genetic information. J Hered 96:722–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nikiforoff CC (1941) Hardpan and micro-relief in certain soil complexes of California. USDA Technical bulletin No. 745, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Peakal R, Smouse PE (2006) GENAlEx 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004) GeneClass2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ramp Neal JM, Ranker TA, Collinge SK (2008) Conservation of rare species with island-like distributions: a case study of Lasthenia conjugens (Asteraceae) using population genetic structure and the distribution of rare markers. Plant Species Biol 23:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramp JM, Collinge SK, Ranker TA (2006) Restoration genetics of the vernal pool endemic Lasthenia conjugens (Asteraceae). Conserv Genet 7:631–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reeder JR (1982) Systematics of the tribe Orcuttieae (Gramineae) and the description of a new segregate genus Tuctoria. Am J Bot 69:1082–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Riley L, McGlaughlin ME, Helenurm K (2010) Genetic diversity following demographic recovery in the insular endemic plant Galium catalinense subspecies acrispum. Conserv Genet 11:2015–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Segelbacher G, Cushman SA, Epperson BK, Fortin MJ, Francois O, Hardy OJ, Holderegger R, Taberlet P, Waits LP, Manel S (2010) Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges. Conserv Genet 11:375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sloop, CM (in press) The population and genetic status of the endangered vernal pool annual Limnanthes floccosa Howell ssp. californica Arroyo: implications for species recovery. In: Schlising RA, DG Alexander (eds) Vernal pool conservation: research, progress and problems: is recovery possible? Studies from the Herbarium, California State University, ChicoGoogle Scholar
  50. Sloop, CM, Ayres DR (in press) Conservation genetics of two endangered vernal pool plants of the Santa Rosa Plain, Sonoma County. Proceedings of the CNPS conservation conference, 17–19 Jan 2009Google Scholar
  51. Sloop CM, Eberl R, Ayres DR (In review) Genetic diversity and structure in the annual vernal pool endemic Limnanthes vinculans Ornduff (Limnanthaceae): implications of breeding system and restoration practices. Conserv GenetGoogle Scholar
  52. Sloop CM, Pickens C, Gordon SP (2011) Conservation genetics of Butte County meadowfoam (Limnanthes floccosa ssp. californica Arroyo), an endangered vernal pool endemic. Conserv Genet 12:211–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Solomeshch AI, Barbour MG, Holland RF (2007) Vernal pools. In: Barbour MG, Keeler-Wolf T, Schoenherr AA (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California, 3rd edn. University of California Press, California, pp 394–424Google Scholar
  54. Stone RD (1990) California’s endemic vernal pool plants: some factors influencing their rarity and endangerment. In: Ikeda DH, Schlising RA (eds) Vernal pools plants: their habitat and biology. Studies from the Herbarium, California State University, ChicoGoogle Scholar
  55. Sun G, Salomon B (2003) Microsatellite variability and heterozygote deficiency in the arctic-alpine Alaskan wheatgrass (Elymus alaskanus) complex. Genome 46:729–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 19:489–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2005) Recovery plan for vernal pool ecosystems of California and Southern Oregon. http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/recovery_plans/vp_recovery_plan_links.htm. Accessed 11 Oct 2010
  58. Weitkamp WA, Graham RC, Anderson MA, Amrhein C (1996) Pedogenesis of a vernal pool Entisol-Alfisol-Vertison catena in southern California. Soil Sci Soc Am 60:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Young AG, Clarke GM (2000) Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah P. Gordon
    • 1
  • Christina M. Sloop
    • 1
    • 2
  • Heather G. Davis
    • 1
  • J. Hall Cushman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologySonoma State UniversityRohnert ParkUSA
  2. 2.San Francisco Bay Joint VentureFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations