Multiple lines of evidence for an Australasian geographic boundary in the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis): population or species divergence?
- 348 Downloads
The taxonomic status of humpback dolphins (genus Sousa, sub-family Delphininae) is unresolved. While the classification of this genus ranges from a single to three nominal species, the International Union for Conservation of Nature and the International Whaling Commission only recognise a ‘two-species’ taxonomy (S. teuszii in west Africa, and S. chinensis in the Indo-Pacific). Under the IUCN (2008), S. chinensis is listed as ‘near threatened’, but is only considered as a ‘migratory’ species in Australia. Taxonomic resolution of the genus Sousa is needed to define particular conservation status and develop appropriate management actions. Using phylogenetic analyses of 1,082 bp of mitochondrial and 1,916 bp of nuclear DNA, we provide multiple lines of genetic evidence for the genetic distinction of S. chinensis in China and Indonesia from S. chinensis in Australia. The separation of Australian Sousa from Sousa of Southeast Asia requires a review of their current conservation status and respective management actions.
KeywordsSpeciation Humpback dolphins Sousa ESU Conservation Phylogenetics
The research was carried out under permit no. 33838 issued by Northern Territories Parks and Wildlife. Ethics approval was given from The University of Charles Darwin (no. A06016). The study was funded with grants to GJP from Flinders University. The samples from Hong Kong were collected as part of a strandings program funded by the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government. We thank Daniel Kreb and the National Marine Fisheries Service, USA for the Indonesian Sousa DNA sample.
- Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Caballero S, Trujillo F, Vianna JA, Barrios-Garrido H, Montiel MG, et al (2007) Taxonomic status of the genus Sotalia: species level ranking for tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis) and costero (Sotalia guianensis) dolphins. Mar Mamm Sci 23:358–386Google Scholar
- Davis JI, Nixon KC (1992) Populations, genetic variation and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst Biol 41:421–435Google Scholar
- Davis LG, Dibner MD, Battey JF (1986) Basic methods in molecular biology, 1st edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Dawbin WH (1972) Dolphins and whales. In: Ryan P (ed) Encyclopaedia of Papua. Melbourne University Pres, New Guinea, pp 270–276Google Scholar
- Jefferson TA, Van Waerebeek K (2004) Geographic variation in skull morphology of humpback dolphins (Sousa spp.). Aquat Mamm 30:3–17Google Scholar
- Mace GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 359:711–719Google Scholar
- Milinkovitch MC, Le Duc R, Tiedemann R, Dizon A (2002) Applications of molecular data in cetacean taxonomy and population genetics with special emphasis on defining species boundaries. In: Evans PGH, Raga JA (eds) Marine mammals: biology and conservation. Kluwer Academic-Plenum Publishers, Dordrecht, NY, pp 325–359Google Scholar
- Moritz C (1994) Defining evolutionary significant units for conservation. Tree 9:373–375Google Scholar
- Parra G, Ross GJB (2009) Humpback dolphins. In: Perrin WF, Wursig B, Thewissen JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Parra GJ, Schick R, Corkeron PJ (2006b) Spatial distribution and environmental correlates of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins. Ecography 29:396–406Google Scholar
- Perrin WF, Reeves RR, Dolar MLL, Jefferson TA, Marsh H, Wang JY, et al (eds) (2005) Report on the second workshop on the biology and conservation of small Cetaceans and Dugongs of Southeast Asia. Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) Technical Series publication no. 9, UNEP/CMS Secretariat, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. The University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar