Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 731–744 | Cite as

Substantial genetic structure among stocked and native populations of the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae) in the United Kingdom

  • Nick Dawnay
  • Louise Dawnay
  • Roger N. Hughes
  • Richard Cove
  • Martin I. Taylor
Research Article


While currently in a state of recovery in the United Kingdom (UK), the grayling (Thymallus thymallus) remains of conservation interest due to its historical decline, socio-economic value and the potential impact of hatchery-reared stock fish on the genetic structure and diversity of wild populations. However, little is known about the levels and distribution of genetic diversity among UK grayling populations. To this end, 27 UK populations of grayling were genotyped across 10 microsatellite loci and sequenced at the mtDNA D-Loop. All populations clustered into four higher-level groups: Northern England, Southern England, Wales, and group consisting of a mixture of native and introduced populations. Ten populations showed evidence of bottleneck or founder effects, and the effective population size (Ne) was low in all populations. In most cases, historical stocking records agreed with the genetic relationships revealed in the study. A D-Loop haplotype network supported the groupings observed in the nuclear data, while phylogenetic inference places the UK populations amongst Central European samples. The combined datasets demonstrate that many of the UK populations can be treated as separate Management Units and we recommend that to preserve population specific genetic diversity, that stocking should be an intervention of last resort. However, if stocking is deemed essential, brood stock should originate from the river to be stocked.


Conservation Population structure Genetic Bottleneck Stocking Ne Thymallus 


  1. Aljanabi SM, Martinez I (1999) Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4692–4693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker CS, Medrano-Gonzalez L, Calambokidis J, Perry A, Pichler F, Rosenbaum H, Straley JM, Urban-Ramirez J, Yamaguchi M, Von Ziegesar O (1998) Population structure of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA variation among humpback whales in the North Pacific. Mol Ecol 7:695–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
  4. Bergerot B, Lasne E, Vigneron T, Laffaille P (2008) Prioritization of fish assemblages with a view to conservation and restoration on a large scale European basin, the Loire (France). Biodivers Conserv 9:2247–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawnay N, McEwing R, Thorpe RS, Ogden R (2008) Preliminary data suggests genetic distinctiveness of gyr and saker falcons. Conserv Genet 9:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Rienzo A, Peterson AC, Garza JC, Valdes AM, Slatkin M, Freimer NB (1994) Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. P Natl Acad Sci-Biol 91:3166–3170Google Scholar
  9. Duchesne P, Turgeon J (2009) FLOCK: a method for quick mapping of admixture without source samples. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1333–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duftner N, Koblmuller S, Weiss S, Medgyesy N, Sturmbauer C (2005) The impact of stocking on the genetic structure of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae) in two alpine rivers. Hydrobiologia 542:121–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (2004) PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin IA (1980) Evolutionary changes in small populations. In: Soule M, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary and ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusett, pp 135–150Google Scholar
  15. Freyhof J, Kottelat M (2008) Thymallus thymallus. In: IUCN 2009. IUCN red list of threatened species, Version 2009.1. Accessed 10 Oct 2009
  16. Gardiner (1989) The distribution of grayling. In: Broughton R (ed) Grayling: the fourth game fish. The Crowood Press, WiltshireGoogle Scholar
  17. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  18. Gross R, Kühn R, Baars M, Schröder W, Stein H, Rottmann O (2001) Genetic differentiation of European grayling populations across the Main, Danube and Elbe drainages in Bavaria. J Fish Biol 58:264–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gum B, Gross R, Rottmann O, Schröder, Kühn (2003) Microsatellite variation in Bavarian populations of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus): implications for conservation. Conserv Genet 4:659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gum B, Gross R, Kuehn R (2005) Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA phylogeography of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus): evidence for secondary contact zones in central Europe. Mol Ecol 14:1707–1725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gum B, Gross R, Kuehn R (2006) Discriminating the impact of recent human mediated stock transfer from historical gene flow on genetic structure of European grayling Thymallus thymallus L. J Fish Biol 69(Suppl C):115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gum B, Gross R, Geist J (2009) Conservation genetics and management implications of European grayling, Thymallus thymallus: synthesis of phylogeography and population genetics. Fisheries Manag Ecol 16:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ibbotson AT, Cove RJ, Ingraham A, Gallagher M, Hornby DD, Furse M, Williams C (2001) A review of grayling ecology, status and management practice: recommendations for future management in England and Wales. R&D Technical Report W245. Environment Agency and Centre for Ecology and HydrologyGoogle Scholar
  25. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2008) ( Accessed on 26th Sept 2008
  26. Koskinen MT, Ranta E, Piironen J, Veselov A, Titov S, Haugen TO, Nilsson J, Carlstein M, Primmer CR (2000) Genetic lineages and postglacial colonization of grayling (Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae) in Europe, as revealed by mitochondrial DNA analyses. Mol Ecol 9:1609–1624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koskinen MT, Nilsson J, Veselov AJe, Potutkin AG, Ranta E, Primmer CR (2002a) Microsatellite data resolve phylogeographic patterns in European grayling, Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae. Heredity 88:391–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koskinen MT, Knizhin I, Primmer CR, Schlötterer C, Weiss S (2002b) Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA phylogeography of Thymallus spp. (grayling) provides evidence of ice-age mediated environmental perturbations in the world’s oldest body of fresh water, Lake Baikal. Mol Ecol 11:2599–2611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koyuk A, Bennett A, Tallmon D (2008) ONeSAMP 1.1.
  30. Lelek A (1984) Threatened fishes of Europe. In: European committee for the conservation of nature and natural resources. Council of Europe. The Freshwater Fishes of Europe 9 AULA-Verlag, WeisbadenGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayr E (1954) Change of genetic environment and evolution. In: Huxley JS, Hardy AC, Ford EB (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Meldgaard T, Nielsen EE, Loeschcke V (2003) Fragmentation by weirs in a riverine system: a study of genetic variation in time and space among populations of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) in a Danish river system. Conserv Genet 14:735–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘evolutionary significant units’ for conservation. TREE 9:373–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Seeb JE (1998) Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Mol Ecol 7:1087–1089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudoin L, Estoup A (2004) GeneClass2: a software for the genetic assignment and first generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  40. Regan CT (1911) The freshwater fishes of the British Isles. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Reiman BE, Allendorf FW (2001) Effective population size and genetic conservation criteria for bull trout. North Am J Fish Manag 21:756–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenburg NA (2004) Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Centre of Computational Medicine and Biology, Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, MI, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HA, Arnheim N (1985) Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analyses for diagnosis of sickle-cell anemia. Science 230:1350–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scribner KT, Gust JR, Fields RL (1996) Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite loci: cross-species amplification and population genetic applications. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:833–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sušnik S, Snoj A, Dovc P (1999a) Microsatellites in grayling (Thymallus thymallus): comparison of two geographically remote populations from the Danubian and Adriatic river basin in Slovenia. Mol Ecol 8:1756–1758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sušnik S, Snoj A, Dovc P (1999b) A new set of microsatellite markers for grayling: BFRO014, BFRO015, BFRO016, BFRO017 and BFRO018. Anim Genet 30:478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sušnik S, Berrebi P, Dovc P, Hansen MM, Snoj A (2004) Genetic introgression between wild, stocked salmonids, the prospects for using molecular markers in population rehabilitation: the case of the Adriatic grayling (Thymallus thymallus L. 1785). Heredity 93:273–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Swatdipong A, Primmer CR, Vasemag A (2010) Historical and recent genetic bottlenecks in European grayling, Thymallus thymallus. Conserv Genet 11:279–292. doi:10.1007/s10592-009-0031-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taberlet P, Bouvet J (1994) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism, phylogeography, and conservation genetics of the brown bear Ursus arctos in Europe. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tallmon DA, Koyuk A, Luikart G, Beaumont MA (2008) ONeSAMP: a program to estimate effective population size using approximate Bayesian computation. Mol Ecol Resour 8:299–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. 111. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Uiblein F, Jagsch A, Honsig-Erlenburg W, Weiss S (2001) Status, habitat use, and vulnerability of the European grayling in Austrian waters. J Fish Biol 59(supp A):223–247Google Scholar
  54. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weiss S, Persat H, Eppe R, Schlötterer C, Uiblein F (2002) Complex patterns of colonization and refugia revealed for European Grayling Thymallus thymallus, based on complete sequencing of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Mol Ecol 11:1393–1407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Werle E, Schneider CS, Renner M, Volker M, Fiehn W (1994) Convenient single-step, one tube purification of PCR product for direct sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4354–4355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wheeler A (1977) The origin and distribution of the freshwater fishes of the British Isles. J Biogeogr 4:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson TK (1963) How our rivers got their grayling. Fishing, June, 9–10Google Scholar
  59. Wilson TK (1966) Trout by all means. Angling Times, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  60. Youngson AF, Jordan WC, Verspoor E, McGinnity P, Cross T, Ferguson A (2003) Management of salmonid fisheries in the British Isles: towards a practical approach based on population genetics. Fish Res 62:193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Dawnay
    • 1
  • Louise Dawnay
    • 1
  • Roger N. Hughes
    • 1
  • Richard Cove
    • 2
  • Martin I. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological SciencesBangor UniversityGwyneddUK
  2. 2.Environment AgencyFlintshireUK

Personalised recommendations