Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 669–678 | Cite as

Can a seed bank provide demographic and genetic rescue in a declining population of the endangered shrub Acacia pinguifolia?

  • Kym M. Ottewell
  • Doug Bickerton
  • Andrew J. Lowe
Research Article

Abstract

Many threatened species suffer reduced genetic diversity as a result of small population size and isolation. However, species with a persistent seed bank may be buffered against genetic loss as seed banks are expected to accumulate the reproductive output of many seasons. For fire-dependent species in decline, prescribed ecological burning may be a means to stimulate germination and recover genetic diversity stored in the seed bank, providing a demographic and genetic rescue effect. Here we investigated the effectiveness of this strategy in a small, isolated and inbred population of the endangered shrub, Acacia pinguifolia. We surveyed genetic diversity and structure of remnant populations of A. pinguifolia and monitored regeneration before and after burning. Germination was stimulated by fire, but seedling numbers 18 months post-fire were low and barely above the number of adults killed by the fire. Genetic diversity was marginally higher in the post-fire seedling cohort than the pre-fire adults (HE = 0.1 vs. 0.09, respectively). Outcrossing rates of open-pollinated seed from surrounding plants suggested moderately high levels of self-fertilisation (tm = 0.65) and analysis of fine-scale genetic structure implied pollen and seed dispersal over distances of several metres, suggesting that restricted gene flow and inbreeding may act to limit genetic diversity in the seed bank. We conclude that prescribed burning has not been immediately successful as a recovery strategy for this relictual population of A. pinguifolia, though future monitoring may detect additional recruits. Alternative conservation strategies, including performing inter-population crosses, may be required to restore genetic diversity and ameliorate extinction risks.

Keywords

Seed bank Regeneration Prescribed burn Genetic diversity Mating system Restoration genetics 

References

  1. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005) Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ecological Associates (2007) Eyre Peninsula bushfire recovery program vegetation monitoring. Department for Environment and Heritage, Port Lincoln, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. Auld TD (2006) Population dynamics of the shrub Acacia suaveolens (Sm.) Willd.: dispersal and the dynamics of the soil seed-bank. Aust J Ecol 11:235–254Google Scholar
  4. Auld TD, Denham AJ (2006) How much seed remains in the soil after a fire? Plant Ecol 187:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossuyt B (2007) Genetic rescue in an isolated metapopulation of a naturally fragmented plant species, Parnassia palustris. Conserv Biol 21:832–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradstock RA (2008) Effects of large fires on biodiversity in south-eastern Australia: disaster or template for diversity? Int J Wildland Fire 17:809–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradstock RA, Auld TD (1995) Soil temperatures during experimental bushfires in relation to fire intensity—consequences for legume germination and fire management in south-eastern Australia. J Appl Ecol 32:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradstock RA, Bedward M, Kenny BJ, Scott J (1998) Spatially-explicit simulation of the effect of prescribed burning on fire regimes and plant extinctions in shrublands typical of south-eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 86:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, Mc Donald M, Vesk PA, Yates C (2008) Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol Appl 1:587–597Google Scholar
  10. Brownlie H, Playford J, Wallace H, Shapcott A (2009) Population ecology and genetics of the vulnerable Acacia attenuata (Mimosaceae) and their significance for its conservation, recovery and translocation. Aust J Bot 57:675–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:479–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coates DJ, Tischler G, McComb JA (2006) Genetic variation and the mating system in the rare Acacia sciophanes compared with its common sister species Acacia anfractuosa (Mimosaceae). Conserv Genet 7:931–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan RW, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Menges ES (2008) Genetic change following fire in populations of a seed-banking perennial plant. Oecologia 158:355–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size—implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Environmental and Biodiversity Services (2009) Prescribed burning as a management tool to stimulate the regeneration of the nationally endangered shrub Acacia pinguifolia (Fat-leaf Wattle). Final Report to Native Vegetation Research Fund, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell TP, Ashton DH (1978) Population studies on Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. I. Variation in seed and vegetative characteristics. Aust J Bot 26:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardner CM, Potts BM, Gore PL (1998) The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 52:614–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 31:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hock Z, Szovenyi P, Schneller JJ, Toth Z, Urmi E (2008) Bryophyte diaspore bank: a genetic memory? Genetic structure and genetic diversity of surface populations and diaspore bank in the liverwort Mannia fragrans (Aytoniaceae). Am J Bot 95:542–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Honnay O, Bossuyt B, Jacquemyn H, Shimono A, Uchiyama K (2008) Can a seed bank maintain the genetic variation in the above ground plant population? Oikos 117:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 18:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jessop JP, Toelken H (1986) Flora of South Australia. South Australian Government Printing Division, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  25. Jusaitis M, Sorensen B (1994) Conservation studies on endangered plant species from South Australia’s agricultural regions. Black Hill Flora Centre, Adelaide, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  26. Lande R, Schemske DW, Schultz ST (1994) High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48:965–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006) How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94:942–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman D, Tallmon DA (2001) Experimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations. Conserv Biol 15:1054–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Obst C (2005) South Australian Murray Darling Basin threatened flora recovery plan. Report to the Threatened Species and Communities section, Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  30. Ooi MKJ, Auld TD, Whelan RJ (2004) Delayed post-fire seedling emergence linked to season: a case study with Leucopogon species (Epacridaceae). Plant Ecol 174:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orchard A, Wilson A (2001) Mimosaceae, Acacia part 2. ABRS/CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouborg NJ, Vergeer P, Mix C (2006) The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants. J Ecol 94:1233–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Outcalt KW, Brockway DG (2010) Structure and composition changes following restoration treatments of longleaf pine forests on the Gulf Coastal Plain of Alabama. For Ecol Manage 259:1615–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Penman TD, Towerton AL (2008) Soil temperatures during autumn prescribed burning: implications for the germination of fire responsive species? Int J Wildland Fire 17:572–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pobke K (2007) Draft recovery plan for 23 threatened flora taxa on Eyre Peninsula, South Australia 2007–2012. Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  37. Reed DH (2005) Relationship between population size and fitness. Conserv Biol 19:563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17(1):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson DM, Kluge RL (2008) Seed banks of invasive Australian Acacia species in South Africa: role in invasiveness and options for management. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 10:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ritland K (2002) Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88:221–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabiiti EN, Wein RW (1987) Fire and Acacia seeds—a hypothesis of colonization success. J Ecol 75:937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stone GN, Raine NE, Prescott M, Willmer PG (2003) Pollination ecology of acacias (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae). Aust Syst Bot 16:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Storfer A (1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biol Conserv 87:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Templeton AR, Levin DA (1979) Evolutionary consequences of seed pools. Am Nat 114:232–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang JL (2004) Application of the one-migrant-per-generation rule to conservation and management. Conserv Biol 18:332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Willi Y, Van Kleunen M, Dietrich S, Fischer M (2007) Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 274:2357–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yates CJ, Broadhurst LM (2002) Assessing limitations on population growth in two critically endangered Acacia taxa. Biol Conserv 108:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kym M. Ottewell
    • 1
    • 2
  • Doug Bickerton
    • 3
  • Andrew J. Lowe
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and BiodiversityUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Department for Environment and HeritageAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations