Conservation Genetics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 595–600 | Cite as

A cryptic and critically endangered species revealed by mitochondrial DNA analyses: the Western Ground Parrot

  • Stephen A. Murphy
  • Leo Joseph
  • Allan H. Burbidge
  • Jeremy Austin
Short Communication

Abstract

We examined cytochrome b sequence data to resolve the intraspecific taxonomy of ground parrots Pezoporus wallicus. The species occurs in fragmented coastal heaths in south-eastern and south-western Australia. Net nucleotide divergences among all eastern populations were very low (0.0–0.6%) and genetic diversity unstructured, suggesting relatively recent common ancestry. Gene flow among them was probably maintained via land bridges and the persistence of suitable habitat during the Pleistocene. In contrast, net nucleotide divergence was high (4.4–5.1%) between western and eastern populations, suggesting more ancient divergence about 2 million years ago. The magnitude of divergence between eastern and western lineages is similar to a wide range of avian congeners. Our data support the need to reconsider the intraspecific taxonomy of ground parrots, and we cautiously suggest the recognition of Western Ground Parrots as a species, P. flaviventris, for conservation prioritization, planning and management purposes. Given their recent precipitous decline to approximately 110 individuals, most of which occur at one location, this makes Western Ground Parrots one of the world’s most threatened bird species.

Keywords

Ground parrot Cryptic species Critically endangered 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank South Coast NRM, Australian National Wildlife Collection Foundation, Australian Wildlife Conservancy, WA Dept. Environment and Conservation, Friends of the Western Ground Parrot and Exetel Pty Ltd. The following individuals played key roles in supporting this work: Abby Berryman, Walter Boles, Steve van Dyck, Stephen Garnett, Karen Gibb, Philippa Horton, Heather Janetzki, Ron Johnstone, Sarah Legge, Robert Palmer and Claire Stevenson. We also thank the Associate Editor and two anonymous referees whose comments improved this manuscript.

References

  1. Blom WM (1988) Late quaternary sediments and sea-levels in bass basin, south eastern Australia—a preliminary report. Search 19:94–96Google Scholar
  2. Boessenkool S, Austin JJ, Worthy TH, Scofield RP, Cooper A, Seddon PJ, Water JM (2009) Relict or colonizer? extinction and range expansion of penguins in southern New Zealand. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 276:815–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2001) A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. J Mammal 82:960–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant SL (1994) Habitat and potential diet of the ground parrot in tasmania. Emu 94:166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burbidge AH, Blyth J (2008) Threatened and rare birds of Western Australia. Department of Environment and Conservation, PerthGoogle Scholar
  6. Burbidge AH, Blyth J, Danks A, Gillen K, Newbey B (1997) Western Ground Parrot interim recovery plan 1996–1999. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Interim Recovery Plan no. 6, PerthGoogle Scholar
  7. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cracraft J (1986) Origin and evolution of continental biotas: speciation and historical congruence within the Australian avifauna. Evolution 40:977–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DECC (2010) Threatened species. Species, populations and ecological communities. http://www.threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au/tsprofile/browse_allspecies.aspx?limit=p. Accessed 16 May 2010
  10. DSE (2007) Advisory list of threatened vertebrate fauna in Victoria. Department of Sustainability and Environment, East MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards SV, Arctander P, Wilson AC (1991) Mitochondrial resolution of a deep branch in the genealogical tree for perching birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 243:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forshaw JM, Cooper W (2002) Australian parrots, 3rd edn. Avi-Trader Publishing, RobinaGoogle Scholar
  13. Garnett S, Crowley G (2000) The action plan for Australian birds 2000. Environment Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Hope GS (1978) The Late Pleistocene and Holocene vegetational history of Hunter Island, north-western Tasmania. Aust J Bot 26:493–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  16. Johns GC, Avise JC (1998) A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol 15:1481–1490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Joseph L, Omland KE (2009) Phylogeography: its development and impact in Australo-Papuan ornithology with special reference to paraphyly in Australian birds. Emu 109:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joseph L, Slikas B, Alpers D, Schodde R (2001) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of New Guinean logrunners (Orthonychidae). Emu 101:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klicka J, Zink RM (1997) The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science 277:1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6196–6200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lambeck K, Chappell J (2009) Sea level change through the last glacial cycle. Science 292:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lovette IJ (2004) Mitochondrial dating and mixed support for the “2% rule” in birds. Auk 121:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mace GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Phil Trans R Soc B 359:711–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murphy SA, Double MC, Legge SM (2007) The phylogeography of palm cockatoos, Probosciger aterrimus, in the dynamic Australo-Papuan region. J Biogeogr 34:1534–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M, Miller JC (1990) A simple method for estimating average number of nucleotide substitutions within and between populations from restriction data. Genetics 125:873–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Norman JA, Christidis L, Joseph L, Slikas B, Alpers D (2002) Unravelling a biogeographical knot: origin of the ‘leapfrog’ distribution pattern of Australo-Papuan sooty owls (Strigiformes) and logrunners (Passeriformes). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 269:2127–2133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. North A (1901–1914) Nests and eggs of birds found breeding in Australia and Tasmania. Special catalogue no. 1, vol 3, part 2. Australian Museum, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  29. Schodde R, Mason IJ (1997) Aves (Columbidae to Coraciidae). Zoological catalogue of Australia, vol. 37.2. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  30. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen A. Murphy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Leo Joseph
    • 3
  • Allan H. Burbidge
    • 4
  • Jeremy Austin
    • 5
  1. 1.Australian Wildlife ConservancySubiaco EastAustralia
  2. 2.Charles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  3. 3.Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO Sustainable EcosystemsCanberraAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Environment and ConservationWildlife Research CentreWannerooAustralia
  5. 5.Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Earth and Environmental SciencesThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations