Conservation Genetics

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 1809–1821

Cryptic diversity and conservation units in the Bahama parrot

  • M. A. Russello
  • C. Stahala
  • D. Lalonde
  • K. L. Schmidt
  • G. Amato
Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10592-010-0074-z

Cite this article as:
Russello, M.A., Stahala, C., Lalonde, D. et al. Conserv Genet (2010) 11: 1809. doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0074-z

Abstract

Wide application of genetic approaches has enhanced the detection of cryptic diversity, even in historically well-studied organisms. In addition to improving our knowledge of biodiversity, detection of cryptic diversity can have important management implications within imperiled groups, such as the Cuban parrot complex (Amazona leucocephala). Bahama parrots (A. l. bahamensis) were once widespread throughout the archipelago, but are now restricted to the two largest islands (Abaco and Inagua). Mitochondrial DNA-based population genetic and phylogenetic analyses revealed the distinctiveness of the Abaco, Inagua and now extirpated Acklins populations, detecting diagnostic character support and reciprocal monophyly indicative of three phylogenetic species. Congruent results were obtained for the Abaco and Inagua populations based on Bayesian clustering analyses of microsatellite genotypic data. Genetic signatures of demographic contraction were identified on Abaco, but not Inagua. These findings were consistent with lower genetics-based estimates of effective population size on Abaco, as well as the disproportionate human impacts reported on the island relative to Inagua. Overall, our results suggest that the taxonomy of the Cuban parrot complex requires revision and that the conservation status of the Abaco phylogenetic species should be immediately elevated to reflect its historical isolation, recent population decline and continued threats to its persistence.

Keywords

Amazona leucocephala bahamensis Cuban Amazon parrot Population genetic Phylogenetic species Historical DNA Museum specimen Subspecies dilemma 

Supplementary material

10592_2010_74_MOESM1_ESM.xls (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 21 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Russello
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Stahala
    • 3
  • D. Lalonde
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. L. Schmidt
    • 4
  • G. Amato
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of British Columbia OkanaganKelownaCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Species at Risk and Habitat StudiesUniversity of British Columbia OkanaganKelownaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  4. 4.Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural HistoryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations