Conservation Genetics

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 139–147 | Cite as

Founder effect and bottleneck signatures in an introduced, insular population of elk

Research Article

Abstract

The population of elk (Cervus elaphus roosevelti) inhabiting Afognak Island, Alaska, USA arose from an introduction of 8 individuals from an established population in Washington, USA in 1929, and recently peaked at approximately 1,400 individuals. We examined indices of diversity for 15 microsatellite loci in the Afognak population and compared them to levels in the parent population to determine effects of translocation and demography on genetic variation. The Afognak population differed significantly (P < 0.0001) from the source population in both allele and genotype frequencies. Allelic richness, number of private alleles and multilocus heterozygosity, but not percent loci polymorphic, were significantly lower in Afognak elk. Mean inbreeding coefficients within Afognak (f = 0.019) and source (f = −0.006) populations did not differ significantly from zero. Despite the demographic bottleneck, no evidence of a genetic bottleneck in the Afognak population was detected using a test for heterozygosity excess or mode shift of allele frequencies. Simulations indicated that rapid population growth after the translocation resulted in heterozygosity excess for only 8 years. Conversely, a statistic testing for a bottleneck signature in the ratio of allele number to allele size range (M-ratio) was significant for both the Afognak and source populations, suggesting that the Afognak population had effectively undergone serial bottlenecks. Nonetheless, Afognak failed to show a smaller M-ratio than the parent population, suggesting a failure of that statistic to detect the bottleneck associated with introduction. We show that a severe bottleneck followed by rapid population growth may be undetectable using available tests.

Keywords

Cervus elaphus Genetic diversity Heterozygosity excess M-ratio Microsatellites Wildlife introductions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, and the Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks provided funding. We thank J. Smith, Washington Dept. of Wildlife, biologists at Olympic National Park and Alaskan hunters for contributing elk tissue samples. We thank M. Van Daele for laboratory assistance and K. Colson and one anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Allendorf FW (1986) Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol 5:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2008) Wolves, trophic cascades, and rivers in the Olympic National Park, USA. Ecohydrology 1:118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop MD, Kappes SM, Keele JW, Stone RT, Sunden SLF, Hawkins GA et al (1994) A genetic linkage map for cattle. Genetics 136:619–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan FC, Crawford AM (1993) Ovine microsatellites at OarFCB11, OarFCB128, OarFCB193, OarFCB266 and OarFCB304 loci. Anim Genet 24:145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burris OE, McKnight DE (1973) Game transplants in Alaska. Wildl. Tech. Bull. 4. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  6. Busch JD, Waser PM, DeWoody A (2007) Recent demographic bottlenecks are not accompanied by a genetic signature in banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis). Mol Ecol 16:2450–2463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeWoody JA, Honeycutt RL, Skow LC (1995) Microsatellite markers in white-tailed deer. J Hered 86:317–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DiRienzo A, Peterson AC, Garza JC, Valdes AM, Slatkin M, Friemer NB (1994) Mutational process of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3166–3170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eberhardt LE, Eberhardt LL, Tiller BL, Cadwell LL (1996) Growth of an isolated elk population. J Wildl Manage 60:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. England PR, Osler GHR, Woodsworth LM, Montgomery ME, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003) Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Conserv Genet 4:595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garza JC, Williamson EG (2001) Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 10:305–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guinand B, Scribner KT (2003) Evaluation of methodology for detection of genetic bottlenecks: inferences from temporally replicated lake trout populations. C R Biol 326:S61–S67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Houlden BA, England PR, Taylor AC, Greville WD, Sherwin WB (1996) Low genetic variability of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south-eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck. Mol Ecol 5:269–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Houston DB, Schreiner EG, Moorhead BB, Krueger KA (1990) Elk in Olympic National Park: will they persist over time? Nat Areas J 10(11):6–11Google Scholar
  16. Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-RARE 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura M, Ohta T (1978) Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:2868–2872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuo C-H, Janzen FJ (2003) bottlesim: a bottleneck simulation program for long-lived species with overlapping generations. Mol Ecol Notes 3:669–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lenney Williams C, Serfass TL, Cogan R, Rhodes OE Jr (2002) Microsatellite variation in the reintroduced Pennsylvania elk herd. Mol Ecol 11:1299–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2002) GDA (genetic data analysis): computer program for the analysis of allelic data. Version 1.1. Available via http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.htm
  21. Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1998) Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conserv Biol 12:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM, Sherwin WB (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89:238–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall JC, Kingsbury BA, Minchella DJ (2009) Microsatellite variation, population structure, and bottlenecks in the threatened copperbelly water snake. Conserv Genet 10:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maudet C, Miller C, Bassano B, Breitenmoser-Wursten C, Gauthier D, Obexer-Ruff G et al (2002) Microsatellite DNA and recent statistical methods in wildlife conservation management: applications in Alpine ibex [Capra ibex (ibex)]. Mol Ecol 11:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore SS, Byrne K, Berger KT, Barendse W, McCarthy F, Womack JE et al (1994) Characterization of 65 bovine microsatellites. Mamm Genome 5:84–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearce DE, Arndt AD, Valenzuela N, Miller BA, Cantarelli V, Sites JW (2006) Estimating population structure under nonequilibrium conditions in a conservation context: continent-wide population genetics of the giant Amazon river turtle. Mol Ecol 15:985–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1999) Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polzhien RO, Hamr J, Mallory FF, Strobeck C (2000) Micosatellite analysis of North American wapiti (Cervus elaphus) populations. Mol Ecol 9:1561–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  31. Spear SF, Peterson R, Matocq MD, Storfer A (2006) Molecular evidence for historical and recent population size reductions of tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) in Yellowstone National Park. Conserv Genet 7:605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spencer CC, Neigel JE, Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 9:1517–1528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Spong G, Hellborg L (2002) A near-extinction event in lynx: do microsatellites tell the tale? Conserv Ecol 6(1):15. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art15 Google Scholar
  34. Vaiman D, Mercier D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Eggen A, Ciampolini R, Lepingle A et al (1994) A set of 99 cattle microsatellites: characterization, synteny mapping, and polymorphism. Mamm Genome 5:288–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson-Natesan EG (2005) Comparison of methods for detecting bottlenecks from microsatellite loci. Conserv Genet 6:551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson GA, Strobeck C, Wu L, Coffin JW (1997) Characterization of microsatellite loci in caribou (Rangifer tarandus), and their use in other artiodactyls. Mol Ecol 6:697–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Arctic Biology and Department of Biology and WildlifeUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Alaska Department of Fish and GameDivision of Wildlife ConservationKodiakUSA

Personalised recommendations