Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 1141–1143 | Cite as

Isolation of novel microsatellite markers for the clouded Apollo (P. mnemosyne Linnaeus, 1758; Lepidoptera, Papilionidae)

  • Parnassius GrattonEmail author
  • V. Sbordoni
Technical Note

Abstract

Five novel polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated and characterized using an enriched genomic DNA library for Parnassius mnemosyne, a European butterfly of conservation concern, and a valuable model for the study of metapopulation dynamics. Allele numbers ranged from 4 to 12 and observed and expected heterozygosities from 0.17 to 0.74 and from 0.26 to 0.835, respectively. Two samples from geographically close populations were analyzed, demonstrating that the new markers can be successfully employed to investigate fine-scale population structure.

Keywords

Microsatellites Lepidoptera Parnassius Primers Clouded Apollo SSR 

References

  1. Araujo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Descimon H, Napolitano M (1993) Enzyme polymorphism, wing pattern variability, and geographical isolation in an endangered butterfly species. Biol Conserv 66:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from: Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  4. Gratton P, Konopinski M, Sbordoni V (2008) Pleistocene evolutionary history of Parnassius mnemosyne: genetic signatures of climate cycles and a “time-dependent” mitochondrial substitution rate. Mol Ecol 17:4248–4262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammond RL, Saccheri IJ, Ciofi C et al (1998) Isolation of microsatellite markers in animals. In: Karp A, Isaac PG, Ingram DS (eds) Molecular tools for screening biodiversity. Plants and animals. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Konvička M, Kuras T (1999) Population structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition sites of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, in Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic. J Insect Conserv 3:211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Meglécz E, Solignac M (1998) Microsatellite loci for Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera). Hereditas 128:179–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meglecz E, Petenian F, Danchin E et al (2004) High similarity between flanking regions of different microsatellites detected within each of two species of Lepidoptera: Parnassius apollo and Euphydryas aurinia. Mol Ecol 13:1693–1700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nève G, Meglécz E (2000) Microsatellite frequencies in different taxa. Trends Ecol Evol 15:376–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Välimäki P, Itämies J (2003) Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats-effects of patch characteristics. Ecography 26:679–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Resour 4:535–538Google Scholar
  12. Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T (2002) Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol 11:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations