Efficiency of markers and methods for detecting hybrids and introgression in stocked populations
- 602 Downloads
Detection of hybridization and introgression in wild populations that have been supplemented by hatchery fish is necessary during development of conservation and management strategies. Initially, allozyme data and more recently highly polymorphic microsatellite markers have been used to obtain this information. We used both markers to assess the effectiveness of four assignment methods (Structure, NewHybrids, Baps and GeneClass) to detect hatchery introgression in wild stocked populations. Simulations of hybrid genotypes from real parental data revealed that the number and type of markers used with Structure, NewHybrids and Baps can identify as admixed most first and second generation hybrids as well as first generation backcrosses. In wild populations, introgression rates estimated from different markers and methods were correlated. However, slight disagreements were observed at both population and individual levels. Overall, the fully Bayesian (Structure, NewHybrids and Baps) performed better than partially Bayesian (GeneClass) assignment tests. In wild collections, Baps analyses were limited because of the lack of a native baseline. In all cases, the efficiency of methods was reduced as introgression increased.
KeywordsAllozymes Assignment methods Brown trout Introgression Microsatellites
This research meets the objectives of the REN-2003–05931/GLO project of the Spanish MCYT. R. Fernandez and M. Vera were fellows of the Spanish MCYT. We thank FM Utter for English revision and for valuable suggestions to improve this manuscript.
- Barilani M, Deregnaucourt S, Gallego S, Galli L, Mucci N, Piombo R, Puigcerver M, Rimondi S, Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD, Spanò S, Randi E (2005) Detecting hibridization in wild (Coturnix c. coturnix) and domesticated (Coturnix c. japonica) quail populations. Biol Conserv 126:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown C, Day RL (2002) The future of stock enhancements: lessons for hatchery practice from conservation biology. Fish Fish 3:79–94Google Scholar
- Estoup A, Largiader CR, Perrot E, Chourrout D (1996) Rapid one-tube DNA extraction for reliable PCR detection of fish polymorphic markers and transgenes. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 5:295–298Google Scholar
- Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
- Gharbi K, Gautier A, Danzmann RG, Gharbi S, Sakamoto T, Hoyheim B, Taggart JB, Cairney M, Powell R, Krieg F, Okamoto N, Ferguson MM, Holm LE, Guyomard R (2006) A linkage map for brown trout (Salmo trutta): chromosome homeologies and comparative genome organization with other salmonid fish. Genetics 172:2405–2419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate Fstatistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
- Hansen MM, Kenchington E, Nielsen EE (2001a) Assigning individuals fish to populations using microsatellite DNA markers. Fish Fish 2:93–112Google Scholar
- Presa P, Guyomard R (1996) Conservation of microsatellites in three species of salmonids. J Fish Biol 49:1326–1329Google Scholar
- Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (ver. 3.3): a population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar