Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 1563–1575 | Cite as

Taxonomic and conservation status of a newly discovered giant landsnail from Mount Augustus, New Zealand

  • Steven A. Trewick
  • Kath J. Walker
  • Corina J. Jordan
Research Article

Abstract

The Rhytidae (Mollusca; Gastropoda; Pulmonata) are a group of large carnivorous land snails distributed in the southern hemisphere, with a particularly rich fauna in New Zealand. The endemic genus Powelliphanta consists of at least 10 species and many more recognised subspecies, most of which are restricted to the western margin of South Island, New Zealand. Powelliphanta taxa tend to have restricted ecological and spatial ranges among the mountains of this region, with some species being limited to lowland forest and others to habitats at or above the treeline. Among recent discoveries is a population of snails occupying habitat on and around a peak called Mt Augustus, which is situated at the edge of a large and economically important coalfield. Since recognition of the potential biological significance of the Mt Augustus snails in 2004, almost all of their habitat has been destroyed by opencast mining revealing a direct conflict between economic and biodiversity prioritisation. Our analysis of mtDNA sequence data indicate Powelliphanta “Augustus” is a distinctive evolutionary lineage, more closely related to a nearby lowland species Powelliphanta lignaria than the spatial and ecological neighbour Powelliphanta patrickensis. Powelliphanta “Augustus” appears to be a specialised local endemic species. Despite a growing international awareness of the importance of biodiversity conservation, the demand for foreign earnings continues to take priority over the protection of our biota.

Keywords

mtDNA Coal mining Extinction Mollusc Biodiversity Gastropod 

References

  1. Backeljau T, Baur A, Baur B (2001) Population and conservation genetics. In: Barker GM (ed) The biology of terrestrial molluscs. CAB International, UK, pp 383–412Google Scholar
  2. Barker GM, Mayhill P (1998) Patterns of diversity and habitat relationships in terrestrial mollusc communities of the Pukeamaru Ecological District, northeastern New Zealand. J Biogeog 25:215–238Google Scholar
  3. Barry JM, Duff SW, Macfarlane DAB (1994) Coal resources of New Zealand. Resource information report 16. Energy and Resources Division, Ministry of Commerce, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  4. Bensasson D, Zhang D-X, Hartl DL, Hewitt GM (2001) Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution’s misplaced witnesses. Trends Ecol Evol 16:314–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard JL, Lynch M (2000) Organellar genes: why do they end up in the nucleus? Trends Genet 16:315–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiba S (2003) Species diversity and conservation of Mandarina, an endemic land snail of the Ogasawar Islands. Global Env Res 7:29–37Google Scholar
  7. Climo FM (1971) A new species of Paryphanta (Mollusca: Paryphantidae) from south-west Fiordland, New Zealand. Rec Dom Mus 7:145–150Google Scholar
  8. Felsentein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijnhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytrochrome c oxidase subunit 1 from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) PhyML—A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Sys Biol 52:696–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haase M, Misof B, Wirth T, Baminger H, Baur B (2003) Mitochondrial differentiation in a polymorphic land snail: evidence for Pleistocene survival within the boundaries of permafrost. J Biol Evol 16:415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hafner MS, Sudman PD, Villablanca FX, Spradling TA, Demastes JW, Nadler SA (1994) Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. Science 265:1087–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond, [Biol] 70:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns J, Janzen DJ, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly, Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14812–14817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland BS, Hadfield MG (2002) Islands within an island: phylogeography and conservation genetics of the endangered Hawaiian tree snail Achatinella mustelina. Mol Ecol 11:365–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland BR, Huber KT, Moulton V, Lockhart PJ (2004) Using consensus networks to visualise contradictory evidence for species phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol 21:1459–1461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huson DH, Bryant D (2006) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johns D (2007) Like it or not, politics is the solution. Conserv Biol 21:287–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KS, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, Thompson FG (2004) The global decline of nonmarine Mollusks. BioScience 54:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mallet J (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 10:294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionary significant units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 373–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nathan S (1996) Geology of the Buller Coalfield, scale 1:50,000. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences geological map 23. GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  24. Orr DW (2007) The politics of carbon. Conserv Biol 21:295–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orme et al. (2005) Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436:1016–1019Google Scholar
  26. Overmars FB, Kilvington MJ, Gibson RS (1998) Ngakawau Ecological District: survey report for the Protected Natural Areas Programme. New Zealand Protected Natural Areas Programme Series No. 11. Department of Conservation, Hokitika, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  27. Ponder WF, Colgan DJ, Gleeson DM, Sherley GH (2003) Relationships of Placostylus from Lord Howe Island: an investigation using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene. Molluscan Res 23:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powell AWB (1979) New Zealand Mollusca. Collins, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  30. Rambaut A (1996) Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor. Available (2/11/07) at http://www.tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/
  31. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2005) Bayesian analysis of molecular evolution using MrBayes. In: Nielsen (ed) Statistical methods in molecular evolution. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Rundell RJ, Holland BS, Cowie RH (2004) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the endemic Hawaiian Succineidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonate). Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:246–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simison BW, Lindberg DR (1999) Morphological and molecular resolution of a putative cryptic species complex: a case study of Notoacmea fascicularis (Menke, 1851) (Gastropoda: patellogastropoda). J Mollusc Stud 65:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solem A, Climo FM, Roscoe DJ (1981) Sympatric species diversity of New Zealand land snails. NZ J Zool 8:453–485Google Scholar
  35. Spencer HG, Marshall BA, Maxwell PA, Grant-Mackie JA, Stilwell JD, Willan RC, Campbell HJ, Crampton JS (2004) Phylum Mollusca—Chitons, clams, tusk shells, snails, squids and kin. In: Gordon DP (ed) The New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. Volume 1. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa and Deuterostomia. Canterbury University Press, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  36. Spencer HG, Brook FJ, Kennedy M (2006) Phylogeography of kauri snails and their allies from Northland, New Zealand (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Rhytidae: Paraphantinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:835–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stine OC (1989) Cepaea nemoralis from Lexington, Virginia: the isolation and characterisation of their mitochondrial DNA, the implications for their origin and climatic selection. Malacologia 30:305–315Google Scholar
  38. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  39. Terrett JA (1992) The mitochondrial genome of Cepaea nemoralis: PhD. thesis, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomaz D, Guiller A, Clarke B (1996) Extreme divergence of mitochondrial DNA within species of pulmonate land snails. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 263:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M, Wallis GP (2000) Phylogeographic pattern correlates with Pliocene mountain building in the alpine scree weta (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae). Mol Ecol 9:657–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trewick SA (2001) Identity of an endangered grasshopper (Acrididae: Brachaspis): taxonomy, molecules and conservation. Conserv Genet 2:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trewick SA (2007) DNA Barcoding is not enough: mismatch of taxonomy and genealogy in New Zealand grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Cladistics 23:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trewick SA, Brescia F, Jordan C (2008) Diversity and phylogeny of New Caledonian Placostylus land snails; evidence from mitochondrial DNA. In: Grandcolas P (ed) Zoologia Neocaledonica 6. Biodiversity studies in New Caledonia. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 196, in pressGoogle Scholar
  45. Walker KJ (2003) Recovery plans for Powelliphanta land snails. Threatened Species Recovery Plan 49. Department of Conservation, New Zealand, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Wardle P (1991) Vegetation of New Zealand. Cambridge Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Weaver KF, Perez-Losada M, Guralnick RP, Nelson A, Blatt S, Crandall KA (2007) Assessing the conservation status of the land snail Oreohelix perpherica wasatchensis (Family Oreohelicidae). Conserv Genet. doi:10.1007/s10592-007-9415-y

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven A. Trewick
    • 1
  • Kath J. Walker
    • 2
  • Corina J. Jordan
    • 1
  1. 1.Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and EvolutionMassey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Research, Development and Improvement Division, Department of ConservationNelsonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations