Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 1369–1372 | Cite as

Identification and characterization of microsatellites from the Antarctic isopod Ceratoserolis trilobitoides: nuclear evidence for cryptic species

Technical Note

Abstract

We report the successful isolation of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers for one species of the marine isopod species complex Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Eights, 1833) from the Southern Ocean. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 6 to 30 for the 148 specimens analysed and heterozygosity ranged from 0.34 to 0.98. Seven microsatellites amplified successfully in a cryptic sister species, which is restricted to the Antarctic Peninsula. This novel marker set provides the opportunity to study and monitor population structure, demography and gene flow patterns for a benthic model taxon in a region that is now subject to rapid climate change.

Keywords

Southern Ocean Benthos Serolidae Cryptic species Microsatellite isolation Population genetics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Wolfgang Wägele (Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany) and Tilman Alpermann (AWI Bremerhaven, Germany) for helpful discussions and Andrea Eschbach for technical assistance. Anna Kop (York University, Toronto, Canada) proofread an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by a DFG grant HE-3391/3 to Christoph Held.

References

  1. Brandt A (1991) Colonization of the Antarctic shelf by the Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Ber Polarforsch 98:1–240Google Scholar
  2. Clarke A (1984) Lipid composition of two species of Serolis (Crustacea, isopoda) from Antarctica. Br Antarct Surv Bull 64:37–53Google Scholar
  3. Clarke A, Gore DJ (1992) Egg size and composition in Ceratoserolis (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Weddell Sea. Polar Biol 12:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Held C (2000) Phylogeny and biogeography of serolid isopods (Crustacea, Isopoda, Serolidae) and the use of ribosomal expansion segments in molecular systematics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 15:165–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Held C (2003) Molecular evidence for cryptic speciation within the widespread Antarctic crustacean Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Crustacea, Isopoda). In: Huiskes AHL, Gieskes WWC, Rozema J, Schorno RML, van der Vies SM, Wolff WJ (eds) Antarctic biology in a global context. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 135–139Google Scholar
  7. Held C, Leese F (2007) The utility of fast evolving molecular markers for studying speciation in the Antarctic benthos. Polar Biol 30:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Held C, Wägele J-W (2005) Cryptic speciation in the giant Antarctic isopod Glyptonotus antarcticus (Isopoda: Valvifera: Chaetiliidae). Sci Mar 69:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalendar R (2003) FastPCR: a program for fast design PCR primer, DNA and protein manipulation (version 2.5.59). Institute of Biotechnology, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  10. Luxmoore RA (1981) The ecology of Antarctic serolid isopods. Council for National Academic Awards, pp 1–231Google Scholar
  11. McKelvey KS, Schwartz MS (2005) DROPOUT: a program to identify problem loci and samples for noninvasive genetic samples in a capture-mark-recapture framework. Mol Ecol Notes 5:716–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meredith MP, King JC (2005) Rapid climate change in the ocean west of the Antarctic Peninsula during the second half of the 20th century. Geophys Res Lett 32:L19604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nolte AW, Stemshorn KC, Tautz D (2005) Direct cloning of microsatellite loci from Cottus gobio through a simplified enrichment procedure. Mol Ecol Notes 5:628–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rousset F (2007) GENEPOP ‘007: a complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Notes (online first). doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x
  16. Valiere N (2002) GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes 2:377–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vaughan DG, Marshall GJ, Connolley WM, Parkinson C, Mulvaney R, Hodgson DA, King JC, Pudsey CJ, Turner J (2003) Recent rapid regional climate warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Clim Change 60:243–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wägele J-W (1986) Polymorphism and distribution of Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Eights, 1833) (Crustacea, Isopoda) in the Weddell Sea and synonymy with C. cornuta (Studer, 1879). Polar Biol 6:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wägele J-W (1987) On the reproductive biology of Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Crustacea: Isopoda): latitudinal variation of fecundity and embryonic development. Polar Biol 7:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson NG, Hunter RL, Lockhart SJ, Halanych KM (2007) Multiple lineages and absence of panmixia in the “circumpolar” crinoid Promachocrinus kerguelensis from the Atlantic sector of Antarctica. Mar Biol 152:895–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and BiodiversityRuhr-University of BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations