Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 1489–1507 | Cite as

Molecular and phenotypic diversity in Chionactis occipitalis (Western Shovel-nosed Snake), with emphasis on the status of C. o. klauberi (Tucson Shovel-nosed Snake).

  • Dustin A. Wood
  • J. M. Meik
  • A. T. Holycross
  • R. N. Fisher
  • A. G. Vandergast
Research Article


Chionactis occipitalis (Western Shovel-nosed Snake) is a small colubrid snake inhabiting the arid regions of the Mojave, Sonoran, and Colorado deserts. Morphological assessments of taxonomy currently recognize four subspecies. However, these taxonomic proposals were largely based on weak morphological differentiation and inadequate geographic sampling. Our goal was to explore evolutionary relationships and boundaries among subspecies of C. occipitalis, with particular focus on individuals within the known range of C. o. klauberi (Tucson Shovel-nosed snake). Population sizes and range for C. o. klauberi have declined over the last 25 years due to habitat alteration and loss prompting a petition to list this subspecies as endangered. We examined the phylogeography, population structure, and subspecific taxonomy of C. occipitalis across its geographic range with genetic analysis of 1100 bases of mitochondrial DNA sequence and reanalysis of 14 morphological characters from 1543 museum specimens. We estimated the species gene phylogeny from 81 snakes using Bayesian inference and explored possible factors influencing genetic variation using landscape genetic analyses. Phylogenetic and population genetic analyses reveal genetic isolation and independent evolutionary trajectories for two primary clades. Our data indicate that diversification between these clades has developed as a result of both historical vicariance and environmental isolating mechanisms. Thus these two clades likely comprise ‘evolutionary significant units’ (ESUs). Neither molecular nor morphological data are concordant with the traditional C. occipitalis subspecies taxonomy. Mitochondrial sequences suggest specimens recognized as C. o. klauberi are embedded in a larger geographic clade whose range has expanded from western Arizona populations, and these data are concordant with clinal longitudinal variation in morphology.


Chionactis occipitalis mtDNA Sonoran desert Mojave Desert ESU Spatial genetic analysis 


  1. Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F (2003) Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol 20:255–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2004) DISTLM Version 5: a FORTRAN computer program to calculate a distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Cited 16 Jun 2005
  3. Avise JC (1994) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Avise JC (1996) Toward a regional conservation genetics perspective: phylogeography of faunas in the southeastern United States. In: Avise JC, Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 431–470Google Scholar
  5. Ayoub NA, Riechert SE (2004) Molecular evidence for Pleistocene glacial cycles driving diversification of a North American desert spider, Agelenopsis aperta. Mol Ecol 13:3453–3465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babik W, Branicki W, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J et al (2005) Phylogeography of the two European newt species-discordance between mtDNA and morphology. Mol Ecol 14: 2475–2491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bailey RG, Avers PE, King T et al (eds) (1994) Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map). Washington, DC, US Geological Survey. Scale 1:7,500,000. Accompanied by a supplementary table of map unit descriptions, McNab WH, Bailey RG (eds). Prepared for the USDA, Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  8. Bethancourt JL (2004) Arid lands paleobiogeography: the rodent midden record in the Americas. In: Lomolino MV, Heaney LR (eds) Frontiers in biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA, pp 27–65Google Scholar
  9. Brandley MC, Schmitz A, Reeder TW (2005) Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst Biol 54:373–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Center for Biological Diversity (2004) Petition to list the Tucson Shovel-nosed snake (Chionactis occipitalis klauberi) as an endangered species. Available from Cited 15 Dec 2004
  11. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coachella valley multiple species habitat conservation plan (2006). Available from
  13. Coyn JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc., BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Crandall KA, Beninda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM et al (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. TREE 15:290–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cross JK (1979) Multivariate and univariate character geography in Chionactis (Reptilia: Serpentes). PhD Thesis, The University of ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  16. Dodd CK Jr, Seigel RA (1991) Relocation, repatriation, and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: Are they conservation strategies that work? Herpetologica 47:336–350Google Scholar
  17. Douglas ME, Douglas MR, Schuett GW et al (2002) Phylogeography of the Western Rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis) complex, with emphasis on the Colorado Plateau. In: Shuett GW, Hoggren M, Douglas ME, Greene HW (eds) Biology of the Vipers. Eagle Mountain Publishing, LC, Eagle Mountain, UT, pp. 11–50Google Scholar
  18. Douglas ME, Douglas MR, Schuett GW et al (2006) Evolution of rattlesnakes (Viperidae; Crotalus) in the warm deserts of western North America shaped by Neogene vicariance and Quaternary climate change. Mol Ecol 15:3353–3374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Felsentein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for identifying conservation units. Mol Ecol 10:2741–2752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:397–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gatesy J, Desalle R, Wheeler W (1993) Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:152–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geffen E, Anderson MJ, Wayne RK (2004) Climate and habitat barriers to dispersal in the highly mobile grey wolf. Mol Ecol 13:2481–2490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldstein PZ, Desalle R, Amato G et al (2000) Conservation genetics at the species boundary. Conserv Biol 14:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haig SM, Beever EA, Chambers SM et al (2006) Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Conserv Biol 20:1584–1594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillis DM, Mable BK, Larson A et al (1996) Nucleic acids IV: Sequencing and cloning, In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (eds) Molecular systematics, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 231–381Google Scholar
  29. Holycross AT, Douglas ME (2007) Geographic isolation, genetic divergence, and ecological non-exchangeability define ESUs in a threatened sky-island rattlesnake. Biol Conserv 134:142–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inferences of phylogenetic trees. Bioinform 17:754–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Irwin DE (2002) Phylogeographic breaks without geographic barriers to gene flow. Evolution 56:2383–2394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Janzen FJ, Krenz JG, Haselkorn TS et al (2002) Molecular phylogeography of common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) in western North America: implications for regional historical forces. Mol Ecol 11:1739–1751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST (2005) Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet 6:13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kimura M (1980) A simple method of estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King RB, Lawson R (1995) Color-pattern variation in Lake Erie water snakes: the role of gene flow. Evolution 49:885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klauber LM (1937) A new snake of the genus Sonora from Mexico. Trans San Diego Soc Nat Hist 8:363–366Google Scholar
  37. Klauber LM (1939) Studies of reptile life in the arid southwest. Bull Zoo Soc San Diego 14:65–79Google Scholar
  38. Klauber LM (1951) The shovel-nosed snake, Chionactis with descriptions of two new subspecies. Trans San Diego Soc Nat Hist 11:141–204Google Scholar
  39. Leaché AD, Reeder TW (2002) Molecular Systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and bayesian approaches. Sys Biol 51:44–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahrdt CR, Beaman KR, Rosen PC et al (2001) Chionactis occipitalis. Catalog Am Amphib Reptile 731:1–12Google Scholar
  42. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297Google Scholar
  43. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: Multivariate analysis of ecological data version 4.26. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OregonGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller MP (2005) Alleles in space (AIS): Computer software for the joint analysis of interindividual spatial and genetic information. J Hered 96:722–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller MP, Bellinger R, Forsman ED, Haig SM (2006) Effects of historical climate change, habitat connectivity, and vicariance on genetic structure and diversity across the range of the red tree vole (Phenacomys longicaudus) in the Pacific Northwestern United States. Mol Ecol 15:145–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mortiz C (1994) Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: A critical review. Mol Ecol 3:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murphy RW, Trépanier TL, Morafka DA (2007) Conservation genetics, evolution and distinct population segments of the Mojave fringe-toed lizard, Uma scoparia. J Arid Environ 67:226–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nylander JAA (2002) MrModeltest v1.0b. Program distributed by the author via Cited 27 Apr 2007
  49. Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP et al (2004) Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst Biol 53:47–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Osada N, Wu C (2005) Inferring mode of speciation from genomic data: a study of the Great Apes. Genetics 169:259–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pilot M, Jedrezejewski W, Branicki W et al (2006) Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Mol Ecol 15:4533–4553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Posada D, Crandall KA, Templeton AR (2000) GEODIS: a program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Mol Ecol 9:487–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosen PC (2003) Avra Valley snakes: Marana survey report for Tucson Shovel-nosed snake (Chionactis occipitalis klauberi). Final Report on shovel-nosed snake prepared for Town of Marana. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and the dilemma of subspecies. TREE 1:9–10Google Scholar
  55. Schulte II JA, Macey JR, Papenfuss TJ (2006) A genetic perspective on the geographic association of taxa among arid North American lizards of the Sceloporus magister complex (Squamata: Iguanidae: Phrynosomatinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 39:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaw KL (2002) Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16122–16127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stickel WH (1941) The subspecies of the Spade-nosed snake, Sonora occipitalis. Bull Chicago Acad Sci 6:135–140Google Scholar
  58. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  59. Templeton AR (1998) Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Mol Ecol 7:381–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Templeton AR (2004) Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Mol Ecol 13:789–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F et al (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trépanier TL, Murphy RW (2001) The Coachella Valley Fringe-toed lizard Uma inornata: genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of an endangered species. Mol Phylogenet Evol 18:327–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. USFWS (U.S. Fish, Wildlife Service) and NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) (1996) Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the Endangered Species Act. Fed Regist 61:4721–4725Google Scholar
  65. Van Devender TM, Thompson RS, Betancourt JL (1987). Vegetation history of the deserts of southwestern North America; The nature and timing of the Late Wisconsin-Holocene transition. In: Ruddiman WF, Wright HE Jr (eds) North America and adjacent oceans during the last deglaciation. The Geology of North America K-3, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp 323–352Google Scholar
  66. Wüster W, Yrausquin JL, Mijares-Urrutia (2001) A new species of indigo snake from north-western Venezuela (Serpentes: Colubridae: Drymarchon). Herpetol J 11:157–165Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dustin A. Wood
    • 1
  • J. M. Meik
    • 2
  • A. T. Holycross
    • 3
  • R. N. Fisher
    • 1
  • A. G. Vandergast
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyWestern Ecological Research CenterSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA
  3. 3.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations