Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 559–567 | Cite as

Novel polymorphic microsatellite loci and patterns of pollen-mediated gene flow in an ex situ population of Eurycorymbus cavaleriei (Sapindaceae) as revealed by categorical paternity analysis

  • Jing Wang
  • Qigang Ye
  • Ming KangEmail author
  • Hongwen Huang
Research Article


Understanding the patterns of contemporary, pollen-mediated gene flow is of great importance for designing appropriate conservation strategies. In this study, ten novel polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated for the rare dioecious tree, Eurycorymbus cavaleriei, and the patterns of pollen dispersal were investigated in an ex situ conserved population. A combination of microsatellite markers with high-collective exclusion power (0.932) was used to assign paternity to 240 seeds collected from eight maternal trees. The average effective pollen dispersal distance (δ) was 292.6 m and the frequency distribution of pollen movement suggested extensive pollen movement in the population. The effective pollen donors per maternal tree (N ep) ranged from 5 to 10, and the most isolated maternal trees were observed with the largest number of N ep = 10. Although a trend of near-neighbor mating was found in seven of eight maternal trees, no significant correlations were detected between the average effective pollen dispersal distance (δ) and the geographic distances (d1 and d2) between maternal and male trees. The increased average effective distance of pollen dispersal and number of N ep for isolated maternal trees might be a compound consequence of low density and long-distance flight of pollinators of this species. The conservation implications of these results are discussed.


Eurycorymbus cavaleriei Ex situ conservation Microsatellites Paternity analysis Pollen flow 



We thank Dr. Sophie Gerber for advice on an earlier draft of the manuscript and Dr. Marshall Tristan for his help with statistical analysis. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (30470185) and KIP Pilot Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-YW-Z-054).


  1. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C et al (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13:937–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaix G, Gerber S, Razafimaharo V et al (2003) Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theor Appl Genet 107:705–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chase M, Kesseli R, Bawa K (1996) Microsatellite markers for population and conservation genetics. Am J Bot 83:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chao CCT, Fang JG, Devanand PS (2005) Long distance pollen flow in mandarin orchards determined by AFLP markers—Implications for seedless mandarin production. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:374–380Google Scholar
  5. Chen J, Wang Y, Kang M et al (2006) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Eurycorymbus cavaleriei, a dioecious endemic tree species in China. Mol Ecol Notes 6:160–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dayanandan S, Attygalla DNC, Abeygunasekera AWWL et al (1990) Phenology and floral morphology in relation to pollination of some Sri Lankan dipterocarps. In: Bawa KS, Hadley M (eds) Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants. Parthenon, Carnforth, UK, pp 103–134Google Scholar
  7. Degen B, Bandou E, Caron H (2004) Limited pollen dispersal and biparental inbreeding in Symphonia globulifera in French Guiana. Heredity 93:585–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dick CW, Etchelecu G, Austerlitz F (2003) Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Mol Ecol 12:753–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  10. Fu LK, Jin JM (eds) (1992) China plant red data book- rare and endangered plant. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  11. García C, Arroyo JM, Godoy JA et al (2005) Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Mol Ecol 14:1821–1830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghazoul J (2005) Pollen and seed dispersal among dispersed plants. Biol Rev 80:413–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghazoul J, Liston KA, Boyle TJB (1998) Disturbance-induced density-dependent seed set in Shorea siamensis (Dipterocarpaceae), a tropical forest tree. J Ecol 86:462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamrick JL, Nason JD (1996) Consequence of dispersal in plants. In: Rhodes OE, Ronald KC, Smith MH (eds) Population dynamics in ecological space and time. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 203–235Google Scholar
  15. Heilbuth JC (2000) Lower species richness in Dioecious clades. Am Nat 156:221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heilbuth JC, Illves K, Otto SP (2001) The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55:880–888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1998) Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in Common Toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. J Evol Biol 11:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishihama F, Nakano C, Ueno S et al (2003) Seed set and gene flow patterns in an experimental population of an endangered heterostylous herb with controlled local opposite-morph density. Funct Ecol 17:680–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenta T, Isagi Y, Nakagawa M et al (2004) Variation in pollen dispersal between years with different pollination conditions in a tropical emergent tree. Mol Ecol 13:3575–3584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konuma A, Tsumura Y, Lee CT et al (2000) Estimation of gene flow in the tropical-rainforest tree Neobalanocarpus heimii (Dipterocarpaceae), inferred from paternity analysis. Mol Ecol 9:1843–1852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latouche-Halle C, Ramboier A, Bandou E et al (2004) Long-distance pollen flow and tolerance to selfing in a Neotropical tree species. Mol Ecol 13:1055–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meagher TR (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am Nat 128:199–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1992) The mating system of Cavanillesia platanifolia under extremes of flowering tree density: a test of predictions. Biotropica 24:99–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nason JD, Herre EA, Hamrick JL (1998) The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature 391:685–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nishizawa T, Watano Y, Kinoshita E et al (2005) Pollen movement in a natural population of Arisaema Serratum (Araceae), a plant with a pitfall-trap flower pollination system. Am J Bot 92:1114–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richards CM, Church S, McCauley DE (1999) The influence of population size and isolation on gene flow by pollen in Silene alba. Evolution 53:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005) Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94:13–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the www for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  31. Schuster WSF, Mitton JB (2000) Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84:348–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silva AD, Luikart G, Yoccoz NG, Cohas A, Alainé D (2006) Genetic diversity-fitness correlation revealed by microsatellite analyses in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Conserv Genet 7:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000) A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol Ecol 9:801–808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE et al (2002) Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley Oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11:1657–1668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR et al (1999) Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 14:219–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stacy EA, Hamrick JL, Nason JD et al (1996) Pollen dispersal in low-density populations of three Neotropical tree species. Am Nat 148:275–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vamosi JC, Vamosi SM (2004) The role of diversification in causing the correlates of dioecy. Evolution 58:723–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vamosi JC, Vamosi SM (2005) Present day risk of extinction may exacerbate the lower species richness of dioecious clades. Divers Distrib 11:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Deynze AE, Sundstrom FJ, Bradford KJ (2005) Pollen-mediated gene flow in California cotton depends on pollinator activity. Crop Sci 45:1565–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002) Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:2038–2204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. William JS, Andrew SP, Paul MD et al (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ye QG, Yao XH, Zhang SJ et al (2006) Potential risk of hybridization in ex situ collections of two endangered species of Sinojackia Hu (Styracaceae). J Integr Plant Biol 48:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Wang
    • 1
  • Qigang Ye
    • 1
  • Ming Kang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hongwen Huang
    • 2
  1. 1.Wuhan Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.South China Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations