Advertisement

Conservation Genetics

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 479–481 | Cite as

Microsatellite markers for the common vole (Microtus arvalis) and their cross-species utility

  • Barbara Walser
  • Gerald HeckelEmail author
Technical Note

Abstract

Fragmentation of natural habitats of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) provides an excellent model system to study the consequences of restricted gene flow and small population sizes for isolated populations. Here we describe the isolation and characteristics of 10 autosomal and one X-linked microsatellite marker. These new markers were tested in 24 voles from a natural population in eastern Germany. Loci were highly polymorphic with numbers of alleles per locus ranging from three to 26 and expected heterozygosities from 0.51 to 0.97. All loci except for the X-linked locus Mar105 followed Hardy–Weinberg expectations. Cross-species amplifications revealed that most loci were polymorphic as well in M. agrestis, M. thomasi, and M. pennsylvanicus.

Keywords

Microtus Genetic markers Microsatellites Short tandem repeats STR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Sabine Fink, Jörg Hahne and Susanne Tellenbach for technical assistance. Support by the Stiftung zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung an der Universität Bern is gratefully acknowledged. This work was funded in part by Swiss National Science Foundation grant 3100A0-112072.

References

  1. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform 1:47–50Google Scholar
  2. Fink S, Excoffier L, Heckel G (2004) Mitochondrial gene diversity in the common vole Microtus arvalis shaped by historical divergence and local adaptations. Mol Ecol 13:3501–3514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fink S, Excoffier L, Heckel G (2006) Mammalian monogamy is not controlled by a single gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10956–10960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glenn TC, Schable NA (2005) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Meth Enzymol 395:202–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heckel G, Burri R, Fink S, Desmet J-F, Excoffier L (2005) Genetic structure and colonization processes in European populations of the common vole Microtus arvalis. Evolution 59:2231–2242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Krystufek B, Reijnders PJH, Spitzenberger F, Stubbe M, Thissen JBM, Vohralik V, Zima J (1999) The atlas of European mammals. T. Poyser, A.D. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  8. Schweizer M, Excoffier L, Heckel G (2007) Fine-scale genetic structure and dispersal patterns in the common vole Microtus arvalis. Mol Ecol 16:2463–2473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational and Molecular Population Genetics (CMPG), Zoological InstituteUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations